Articles | Volume 30, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-183-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-183-2026
Research article
 | 
14 Jan 2026
Research article |  | 14 Jan 2026

Quantifying uncertainty in flood predictions due to river bathymetry estimation

Martin Nguyen, Matthew D. Wilson, Emily M. Lane, James Brasington, and Rose A. Pearson

Viewed

Total article views: 1,913 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,527 318 68 1,913 67 104
  • HTML: 1,527
  • PDF: 318
  • XML: 68
  • Total: 1,913
  • BibTeX: 67
  • EndNote: 104
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Dec 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Dec 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,913 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,882 with geography defined and 31 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 10 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
River depth is crucial in flood modelling, yet often unavailable. Estimation methods can fill this gap but have errors that can affect flood modelling outputs. Our study quantified flood-prediction uncertainty due to these errors. Between Uniform Flow and Conceptual Multivariate Regression formulas, river depths from the former have higher uncertainty than the latter. Among parameters used in these equations, river width corresponds to the largest uncertainty, followed by the flow and slope.
Share