Articles | Volume 30, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-1523-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-1523-2026
Research article
 | 
25 Mar 2026
Research article |  | 25 Mar 2026

Different tracer, different bias: using radon to reveal flow paths beyond the Window of Detection

Johanna Bacher, Julian Klaus, Adam S. Ward, Jasmine Krause, Catalina Segura, and Clarissa Glaser

Viewed

Total article views: 3,303 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,631 566 106 3,303 208 85 148
  • HTML: 2,631
  • PDF: 566
  • XML: 106
  • Total: 3,303
  • Supplement: 208
  • BibTeX: 85
  • EndNote: 148
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jun 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jun 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,303 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,284 with geography defined and 19 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 20 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Understanding solute transport often relies on slug tracer experiments. These experiments are biassed toward capturing faster flow paths and miss longer timescales. We explore integrating a slug-injected tracer with naturally occurring radon to quantify flow paths across different timescales at the reach scale. We show that jointly calibrating a transient storage model with both tracers strengthens parameter constraints and improves solute transport estimates in future studies.
Share