Articles | Volume 29, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4457-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4457-2025
Research article
 | 
17 Sep 2025
Research article |  | 17 Sep 2025

Interrogating process deficiencies in large-scale hydrologic models with interpretable machine learning

Admin Husic, John Hammond, Adam N. Price, and Joshua K. Roundy

Related authors

Deducing land–atmosphere coupling regimes from SMAP soil moisture
Payal R. Makhasana, Joseph A. Santanello, Patricia M. Lawston-Parker, and Joshua K. Roundy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5087–5106, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5087-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5087-2024, 2024
Short summary
Snow Persistence Explains Stream High Flow and Low Flow Signatures with Differing Relationships by Aridity and Climatic Seasonality
Edward Le, Ali Ameli, Joseph Janssen, and John Hammond
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-106,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-106, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbaspour, K. C., Rouholahnejad, E., Vaghefi, S., Srinivasan, R., Yang, H., and Kløve, B.: A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model, J. Hydrol., 524, 733–752, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.027, 2015. 
Althoff, D. and Rodrigues, L. N.: Goodness-of-fit criteria for hydrological models: Model calibration and performance assessment, J. Hydrol., 600, 126674, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126674, 2021. 
Araki, R., Ogden, F. L., and McMillan, H. K.: Testing Soil Moisture Performance Measures in the Conceptual-Functional Equivalent to the WRF-Hydro National Water Model, JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 61, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.70002, 2025. 
Beven, K.: A brief history of information and disinformation in hydrological data and the impact on the evaluation of hydrological models, Hydrol. Sci. J., 69, 519–527, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2024.2332616, 2024. 
Bhaskar, A. S., Hopkins, K. G., Smith, B. K., Stephens, T. A., and Miller, A. J.: Hydrologic Signals and Surprises in U.S. Streamflow Records During Urbanization, Water Resour. Res., 56, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR027039, 2020. 
Download
Short summary
We used interpretable machine learning to evaluate the accuracy of two continental-scale hydrologic models. We analyzed a suite of catchment attributes and found that soil water content had the biggest impact on model performance, especially in dry areas. Key thresholds for variables like precipitation and road density were identified, which could guide future improvements in these models. Our findings highlight the potential of data-driven methods to inform process-based models.
Share