Articles | Volume 28, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5459-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5459-2024
Research article
 | 
18 Dec 2024
Research article |  | 18 Dec 2024

Technical assessment combined with an extended cost–benefit analysis for the restoration of groundwater and forest ecosystem services – an application for Grand Bahama

Anne Imig, Francesca Perosa, Carolina Iwane Hotta, Sophia Klausner, Kristen Welsh, Yan Zheng, and Arno Rein

Viewed

Total article views: 634 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
474 127 33 634 64 19 23
  • HTML: 474
  • PDF: 127
  • XML: 33
  • Total: 634
  • Supplement: 64
  • BibTeX: 19
  • EndNote: 23
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Oct 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Oct 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 634 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 611 with geography defined and 23 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 18 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
In 2019, Hurricane Dorian led to salinization of groundwater resources on the island of Grand Bahama. We assessed the feasibility of managed aquifer recharge (MAR) for restoring fresh groundwater. Furthermore, we applied a financial and an extended cost–benefit analysis for assessing ecosystem services supported by MAR and reforestation. As a first estimate, MAR could only provide a small contribution to the water demand. Reforestation measures were assessed to be financially profitable.