Articles | Volume 27, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2899-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2899-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Throughfall spatial patterns translate into spatial patterns of soil moisture dynamics – empirical evidence
Christine Fischer-Bedtke
Institute of Geosciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Burgweg 11, 07749 Jena, Germany
Office for Green Spaces and Waters, City of Leipzig, Prager Straße 118–136, 04217 Leipzig, Germany
previously published under the name Christine Fischer
Johanna Clara Metzger
Institute of Geosciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Burgweg 11, 07749 Jena, Germany
Institute of Soil Science, University of Hamburg, Allende-Platz 2, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
Gökben Demir
Institute of Geosciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Burgweg 11, 07749 Jena, Germany
Thomas Wutzler
Biogeochemical Integration, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Straße 10, 07745 Jena, Germany
Institute of Geosciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Burgweg 11, 07749 Jena, Germany
Department of Computational Hydrosystems, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Laura Nadolski, Tarek S. El-Madany, Jacob Nelson, Arnaud Carrara, Gerardo Moreno, Richard Nair, Yunpeng Luo, Anke Hildebrandt, Victor Rolo, Markus Reichstein, and Sung-Ching Lee
Biogeosciences, 22, 2935–2958, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2935-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2935-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Semi-arid ecosystems are crucial for Earth's carbon balance and are sensitive to changes in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) levels. Their carbon dynamics are complex and not fully understood. We studied how long-term nutrient changes affect carbon exchange. In summer, the addition of N+P changed plant composition and productivity. In transitional seasons, carbon exchange was less weather-dependent with N. The addition of N and N+P increases carbon-exchange variability, driven by grass greenness.
Sven Armin Westermann, Anke Hildebrandt, Souhail Bousetta, and Stephan Thober
Biogeosciences, 21, 5277–5303, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5277-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5277-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Plants at the land surface mediate between soil and the atmosphere regarding water and carbon transport. Since plant growth is a dynamic process, models need to consider these dynamics. Two models that predict water and carbon fluxes by considering plant temporal evolution were tested against observational data. Currently, dynamizing plants in these models did not enhance their representativeness, which is caused by a mismatch between implemented physical relations and observable connections.
Sandra Raab, Karel Castro-Morales, Anke Hildebrandt, Martin Heimann, Jorien Elisabeth Vonk, Nikita Zimov, and Mathias Goeckede
Biogeosciences, 21, 2571–2597, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2571-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2571-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Water status is an important control factor on sustainability of Arctic permafrost soils, including production and transport of carbon. We compared a drained permafrost ecosystem with a natural control area, investigating water levels, thaw depths, and lateral water flows. We found that shifts in water levels following drainage affected soil water availability and that lateral transport patterns were of major relevance. Understanding these shifts is crucial for future carbon budget studies.
Sinikka J. Paulus, Rene Orth, Sung-Ching Lee, Anke Hildebrandt, Martin Jung, Jacob A. Nelson, Tarek Sebastian El-Madany, Arnaud Carrara, Gerardo Moreno, Matthias Mauder, Jannis Groh, Alexander Graf, Markus Reichstein, and Mirco Migliavacca
Biogeosciences, 21, 2051–2085, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2051-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2051-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Porous materials are known to reversibly trap water from the air, even at low humidity. However, this behavior is poorly understood for soils. In this analysis, we test whether eddy covariance is able to measure the so-called adsorption of atmospheric water vapor by soils. We find that this flux occurs frequently during dry nights in a Mediterranean ecosystem, while EC detects downwardly directed vapor fluxes. These results can help to map moisture uptake globally.
Martin Jung, Jacob Nelson, Mirco Migliavacca, Tarek El-Madany, Dario Papale, Markus Reichstein, Sophia Walther, and Thomas Wutzler
Biogeosciences, 21, 1827–1846, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1827-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1827-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a methodology to detect inconsistencies in perhaps the most important data source for measurements of ecosystem–atmosphere carbon, water, and energy fluxes. We expect that the derived consistency flags will be relevant for data users and will help in improving our understanding of and our ability to model ecosystem–climate interactions.
Thomas Wutzler, Christian Reimers, Bernhard Ahrens, and Marion Schrumpf
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2705–2725, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2705-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2705-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Soil microbes provide a strong link for elemental fluxes in the earth system. The SESAM model applies an optimality assumption to model those linkages and their adaptation. We found that a previous heuristic description was a special case of a newly developed more rigorous description. The finding of new behaviour at low microbial biomass led us to formulate the constrained enzyme hypothesis. We now can better describe how microbially mediated linkages of elemental fluxes adapt across decades.
Gökben Demir, Andrew J. Guswa, Janett Filipzik, Johanna Clara Metzger, Christine Römermann, and Anke Hildebrandt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1441–1461, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1441-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1441-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Experimental evidence is scarce to understand how the spatial variation in below-canopy precipitation affects root water uptake patterns. Here, we conducted field measurements to investigate drivers of root water uptake patterns while accounting for canopy induced heterogeneity in water input. We found that tree species interactions and soil moisture variability, rather than below-canopy precipitation patterns, control root water uptake patterns in a mixed unmanaged forest.
Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Conrad Jackisch, Wolfgang Durner, Kai Germer, Sascha C. Iden, Janis Kreiselmeier, Frederic Leuther, Johanna C. Metzger, Mahyar Naseri, and Andre Peters
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4417–4432, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4417-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4417-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The article describes a collection of 572 data sets of soil water retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data measured with state-of-the-art laboratory methods. Furthermore, the data collection contains basic soil properties such as soil texture and organic carbon content. We expect that the data will be useful for various important purposes, for example, the development of soil hydraulic property models and related pedotransfer functions.
Lin Yu, Silvia Caldararu, Bernhard Ahrens, Thomas Wutzler, Marion Schrumpf, Julian Helfenstein, Chiara Pistocchi, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 20, 57–73, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-57-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-57-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we addressed a key weakness in current ecosystem models regarding the phosphorus exchange in the soil and developed a new scheme to describe this process. We showed that the new scheme improved the model performance for plant productivity, soil organic carbon, and soil phosphorus content at five beech forest sites in Germany. We claim that this new model could be used as a better tool to study ecosystems under future climate change, particularly phosphorus-limited systems.
Sinikka Jasmin Paulus, Tarek Sebastian El-Madany, René Orth, Anke Hildebrandt, Thomas Wutzler, Arnaud Carrara, Gerardo Moreno, Oscar Perez-Priego, Olaf Kolle, Markus Reichstein, and Mirco Migliavacca
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6263–6287, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6263-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6263-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we analyze small inputs of water to ecosystems such as fog, dew, and adsorption of vapor. To measure them, we use a scaling system and later test our attribution of different water fluxes to weight changes. We found that they occur frequently during 1 year in a dry summer ecosystem. In each season, a different flux seems dominant, but they all mainly occur during the night. Therefore, they could be important for the biosphere because rain is unevenly distributed over the year.
Thomas Wutzler, Lin Yu, Marion Schrumpf, and Sönke Zaehle
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8377–8393, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8377-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8377-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Soil microbes process soil organic matter and affect carbon storage and plant nutrition at the ecosystem scale. We hypothesized that decadal dynamics is constrained by the ratios of elements in litter inputs, microbes, and matter and that microbial community optimizes growth. This allowed the SESAM model to descibe decadal-term carbon sequestration in soils and other biogeochemical processes explicitly accounting for microbial processes but without its problematic fine-scale parameterization.
Friedrich Boeing, Oldrich Rakovec, Rohini Kumar, Luis Samaniego, Martin Schrön, Anke Hildebrandt, Corinna Rebmann, Stephan Thober, Sebastian Müller, Steffen Zacharias, Heye Bogena, Katrin Schneider, Ralf Kiese, Sabine Attinger, and Andreas Marx
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5137–5161, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5137-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5137-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we deliver an evaluation of the second generation operational German drought monitor (https://www.ufz.de/duerremonitor) with a state-of-the-art compilation of observed soil moisture data from 40 locations and four different measurement methods in Germany. We show that the expressed stakeholder needs for higher resolution drought information at the one-kilometer scale can be met and that the agreement of simulated and observed soil moisture dynamics can be moderately improved.
Ralf Loritz, Maoya Bassiouni, Anke Hildebrandt, Sibylle K. Hassler, and Erwin Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4757–4771, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4757-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4757-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we combine a deep-learning approach that predicts sap flow with a hydrological model to improve soil moisture and transpiration estimates at the catchment scale. Our results highlight that hybrid-model approaches, combining machine learning with physically based models, are a promising way to improve our ability to make hydrological predictions.
Bahar Bahrami, Anke Hildebrandt, Stephan Thober, Corinna Rebmann, Rico Fischer, Luis Samaniego, Oldrich Rakovec, and Rohini Kumar
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6957–6984, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6957-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6957-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Leaf area index (LAI) and gross primary productivity (GPP) are crucial components to carbon cycle, and are closely linked to water cycle in many ways. We develop a Parsimonious Canopy Model (PCM) to simulate GPP and LAI at stand scale, and show its applicability over a diverse range of deciduous broad-leaved forest biomes. With its modular structure, the PCM is able to adapt with existing data requirements, and run in either a stand-alone mode or as an interface linked to hydrologic models.
Swamini Khurana, Falk Heße, Anke Hildebrandt, and Martin Thullner
Biogeosciences, 19, 665–688, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-665-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-665-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we concluded that the residence times of solutes and the Damköhler number (Da) of the biogeochemical reactions in the domain are governing factors for evaluating the impact of spatial heterogeneity of the domain on chemical (such as carbon and nitrogen compounds) removal. We thus proposed a relationship to scale this impact governed by Da. This relationship may be applied in larger domains, thereby resulting in more accurate modelling outcomes of nutrient removal in groundwater.
Josephin Kroll, Jasper M. C. Denissen, Mirco Migliavacca, Wantong Li, Anke Hildebrandt, and Rene Orth
Biogeosciences, 19, 477–489, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-477-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-477-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Plant growth relies on having access to energy (solar radiation) and water (soil moisture). This energy and water availability is impacted by weather extremes, like heat waves and droughts, which will occur more frequently in response to climate change. In this context, we analysed global satellite data to detect in which regions extreme plant growth is controlled by energy or water. We find that extreme plant growth is associated with temperature- or soil-moisture-related extremes.
Cited articles
André, F., Jonard, M., Jonard, F., and Ponette, Q.: Spatial and temporal patterns of throughfall volume in a deciduous mixed-species stand, J. Hydrol., 400, 244–254, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.037, 2011.
Aussenac, G.: Action du couvert forestier sur la distribution au sol des précipitations, Ann. Sci. Forest., 27, 383–399, https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/19700403, 1970.
Bachmair, S., Weiler, M., and Troch, P. A.: Intercomparing hillslope hydrological dynamics: Spatio-temporal variability and vegetation cover effects, Water Resour. Res., 48, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011196, 2012.
Baram, S., Kurtzman, D., and Dahan, O.: Water percolation through a clayey vadose zone, J. Hydrol., 424–425, 165–171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.040, 2012.
Bárdossy, A. and Kundzewicz, Z. W.: Geostatistical methods for detection of outliers in groundwater quality spatial fields, J. Hydrol., 115, 343–359, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90213-H, 1990.
Bartón, K.: MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference, R package version 1.43.17, https://CRAN.R-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/MuMIn/ (last access: 2 February 2022), 2020.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S.: Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4, J. Stat. Softw., 67, 1–48, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01, 2015.
Bellot, J. and Escarre, A.: Stemflow and throughfall determination in a resprouted Mediterranean holm-oak forest, Ann. Sci. Forest., 55, 847–865, https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19980708, 1998.
Beven, K. and Germann, P.: Macropores and water flow in soils revisited, Water Resour. Res., 49, 3071–3092, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20156, 2013.
Blume, T., Zehe, E., and Bronstert, A.: Use of soil moisture dynamics and patterns at different spatio-temporal scales for the investigation of subsurface flow processes, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1215–1233, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1215-2009, 2009.
Bogena, H. R., Herbst, M., Huisman, J. A., Rosenbaum, U., Weuthen, A., and Vereecken, H.: Potential of Wireless Sensor Networks for Measuring Soil Water Content Variability, Vadoze Zone J., 9, 1002–1013, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2009.0173, 2010.
Bonett, D. G.: Confidence interval for a coefficient of quartile variation, Comput. Stat. Data An., 50, 2953–2957, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2005.05.007, 2006.
Bouten, W., Heimovaara, T. J., and Tiktak, A.: Spatial patterns of throughfall and soil water dynamics in a Douglas fir stand, Water Resour. Res., 28, 3227–3233, https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR01764, 1992.
Brocca, L., Morbidelli, R., Melone, F., and Moramarco, T.: Soil moisture spatial variability in experimental areas of central Italy, J. Hydrol., 333, 356–373, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.004, 2007.
Brown, A. E., Zhang, L., McMahon, T. A., Western, A. W., and Vertessy, R. A.: A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation, J. Hydrol., 310, 28–61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.010, 2005.
Carlyle-Moses, D. E.: Throughfall, stemflow, and canopy interception loss fluxes in a semi-arid Sierra Madre Oriental matorral community, J. Arid Environ., 58, 181–202, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00125-3, 2004.
Carlyle-Moses, D. E. and Gash, J. H. C.: Rainfall Interception Loss by Forest Canopies, in: Forest Hydrology and Biogeochemistry: Synthesis of Past Research and Future Directions, Ecological Studies 216, edited by: Levia, D. F., Carlyle-Moses, D. E., and Tanaka, T., Spinger Science+Business Media, 407–423, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1363-5, 2011.
Carlyle-Moses, D. E., Iida, S., Germer, S., Llorens, P., Michalzik, B., Nanko, K., Tischer, A., and Levia, D. F.: Expressing stemflow commensurate with its ecohydrological importance, Adv. Water Resour., 121, 472–479, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.08.015, 2018.
Coenders-Gerrits, A. M. J., Hopp, L., Savenije, H. H. G., and Pfister, L.: The effect of spatial throughfall patterns on soil moisture patterns at the hillslope scale, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1749–1763, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1749-2013, 2013.
Cressie, N. and Hawkins, D. M.: Robust estimation of the variogram: I, Math. Geol., 12, 115–125, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01035243, 1980.
Crockford, R. H. and Richardson, D. P.: Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception: effect of forest type, ground cover and climate, Hydrol. Process., 14, 2903–2920, https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085(200011/12)14:16/17<2903::AID-HYP126>3.0.CO;2-6, 2000.
Demand, D., Blume, T., and Weiler, M.: Spatio-temporal relevance and controls of preferential flow at the landscape scale, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4869–4889, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4869-2019, 2019.
Dowd, P. A.: The Variogram and Kriging: Robust and Resistant Estimators, in: Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterization: Part 1, edited by: Verly, G., David, M., Journel, A. G., and Marechal, A., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 91–106, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3699-7_6, 1984.
Durocher, M. G.: Monitoring spatial variability of forest interception, Hydrol. Process., 4, 215–229, 1990.
Falkengren-Grerup, U.: Effect of stemflow on beech forest soils and vegetation in southern Sweden, Plant Ecol., 26, 341–352, 1989.
Famiglietti, J. S., Rudnicki, J. W., and Rodell, M.: Variability in surface moisture content along a hillslope transect: Rattlesnake Hill, Texas, J. Hydrol., 210, 259–281, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00187-5, 1998.
Fan, J., Oestergaard, K. T., Guyot, A., Jensen, D. G., and Lockington, D. A.: Spatial variability of throughfall and stemflow in an exotic pine plantation of subtropical coastal Australia, Hydrol. Process., 29, 793–804, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10193, 2015a.
Fan, J., Scheuermann, A., Guyot, A., Baumgartl, T., and Lockington, D. A.: Quantifying spatiotemporal dynamics of root-zone soil water in a mixed forest on subtropical coastal sand dune using surface ERT and spatial TDR, J. Hydrol., 523, 475–488, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.064, 2015b.
Fathizadeh, O., Attarod, P., Keim, R. F., Stein, A., Amiri, G. Z., and Darvishsefat, A. A.: Spatial heterogeneity and temporal stability of throughfall under individual Quercus brantii trees, Hydrol. Process., 28, 1124–1136, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9638, 2014.
Fischer-Bedtke, C., Hildebrandt, A., and Metzger, J. C.: Soil water content before and after rain events, May–July 2014–2016, Hainich, Germany, project AquaDiva (1.0.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8063928, 2023.
Genton, M. G.: Highly Robust Variogram Estimation, Math. Geol., 30, 213–221, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021728614555, 1998.
Germer, S.: Development of near-surface perched water tables during natural and artificial stemflow generation by babassu palms, J. Hydrol., 507, 262–272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.026, 2013.
Gerrits, A. M. J. and Savenije, H. H. G.: Forest Floor Interception, in: Forest Hydrology and Biogeochemistry: Synthesis of Past Research and Future Directions, edited by: Levia, D. F., Carlyle-Moses, D., and Tanaka, T., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 445–454, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1363-5_22, 2011.
Graham, M. H.: Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression, Ecology, 84, 2809–2815, https://doi.org/10.1890/02-3114, 2003.
Gräler, B., Pebesma, E., and Heuvelink, G.: Spatio-Temporal Interpolation using gstat, R J., 8, 204–218, 2016.
Guswa, A. J.: Canopy vs. Roots: Production and Destruction of Variability in Soil Moisture and Hydrologic Fluxes, Vadose Zone J., 11, vzj2011.0159, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2011.0159, 2012.
Guswa, A. J. and Spence, C. M.: Effect of throughfall variability on recharge: Application to hemlock and deciduous forests in western Massachusetts, Ecohydrology, 5, 563–574, https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.281, 2012.
Guswa, A. J., Tetzlaff, D., Selker, J. S., Carlyle-Moses, D. E., Boyer, E. W., Bruen, M., Cayuela, C., Creed, I. F., van de Giesen, N., Grasso, D., Hannah, D. M., Hudson, J. E., Hudson, S. A., Iida, S., Jackson, R. B., Katul, G. G., Kumagai, T., Llorens, P., Lopes Ribeiro, F., Michalzik, B., Nanko, K., Oster, C., Pataki, D. E., Peters, C. A., Rinaldo, A., Sanchez Carretero, D., Trifunovic, B., Zalewski, M., Haagsma, M., and Levia, D. F.: Advancing ecohydrology in the 21st century: A convergence of opportunities, Ecohydrology, 13, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2208, 2020.
Hagen, K., Berger, A., Gartner, K., Geitner, C., Kofler, T., Kogelbauer, I., Kohl, B., Markart, G., Meißl, G., and Niedertscheider, K.: Event-based dynamics of the soil water content at Alpine sites (Tyrol, Austria), Catena, 194, 104682, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104682, 2020.
Herwitz, S. R.: Infiltration-excess caused by Stemflow in a cyclone-prone tropical rainforest, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 11, 401–412, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290110406, 1986.
Herwitz, S. R.: Raindrop impact and water flow on the vegetative surfaces of trees and the effects on stemflow and throughfall generation, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 12, 425–432, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290120408, 1987.
Herwitz, S. R. and Slye, R. E.: Three-dimensional modeling of canopy tree interception of wind-driven rainfall, J. Hydrol., 168, 205–226, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)02643-P, 1995.
Hillel, D.: Environmental Soil Physics, Academic Press, Boston, 771 pp., ISBN 978-0-12-348525-0, 1998.
Horton, R. E.: Rainfall Interception, Mon. Weather Rev., 47, 603–623, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1919)47<603:RI>2.0.CO;2, 1919.
Hsueh, Y. H., Allen, S. T., and Keim, R. F.: Fine-scale spatial variability of throughfall amount and isotopic composition under a hardwood forest canopy, Hydrol. Process., 30, 1796–1803, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10772, 2016.
Keim, R., Skaugset, A., and Weiler, M.: Temporal persistence of spatial patterns in throughfall, J. Hydrol., 314, 263–274, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.021, 2005.
Keim, R. F. and Link, T. E.: Linked spatial variability of throughfall amount and intensity during rainfall in a coniferous forest, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 248, 15–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.09.006, 2018.
Kimmins, J. P.: Some Statistical Aspects of Sampling Throughfall Precipitation in Nutrient Cycling Studies in British Columbian Coastal Forests, Ecology, 54, 1008–1019, https://doi.org/10.2307/1935567, 1973.
Klos, P. Z., Chain-Guadarrama, A., Link, T. E., Finegan, B., Vierling, L. A., and Chazdon, R.: Throughfall heterogeneity in tropical forested landscapes as a focal mechanism for deep percolation, J. Hydrol., 519, 2180–2188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.004, 2014.
Kohlhepp, B., Lehmann, R., Seeber, P., Küsel, K., Trumbore, S. E., and Totsche, K. U.: Aquifer configuration and geostructural links control the groundwater quality in thin-bedded carbonate–siliciclastic alternations of the Hainich CZE, central Germany, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 6091–6116, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6091-2017, 2017.
Korres, W., Reichenau, T. G., Fiener, P., Koyama, C. N., Bogena, H. R., Cornelissen, T., Baatz, R., Herbst, M., Diekkrüger, B., Vereecken, H., and Schneider, K.: Spatio-temporal soil moisture patterns – A meta-analysis using plot to catchment scale data, J. Hydrol., 520, 326–341, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.042, 2015.
Küsel, K., Totsche, K. U., Trumbore, S. E., Lehmann, R., Steinhäuser, C., and Herrmann, M.: How Deep Can Surface Signals Be Traced in the Critical Zone? Merging Biodiversity with Biogeochemistry Research in a Central German Muschelkalk Landscape, Front. Earth Sci., 4, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00032, 2016.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., and Christensen, R. H. B.: lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models, J. Stat. Softw., 82, 1–26, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13, 2017.
Lange, B., Lüescher, P., and Germann, P. F.: Significance of tree roots for preferential infiltration in stagnic soils, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1809–1821, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1809-2009, 2009.
Lark, R. M.: A comparison of some robust estimators of the variogram for use in soil survey, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 51, 137–157, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2000.00280.x, 2000.
Lark, R. M.: Modelling complex soil properties as contaminated regionalized variables, Geoderma, 106, 173–190, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00123-9, 2002.
Lehmann, K., Lehmann, R., and Totsche, K. U.: Event-driven dynamics of the total mobile inventory in undisturbed soil account for significant fluxes of particulate organic carbon, Sci. Total Environ., 756, 143774, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143774, 2021.
Lehmann, R. and Totsche, K. U.: Multi-directional flow dynamics shape groundwater quality in sloping bedrock strata, J. Hydrol., 580, 124291, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124291, 2020.
Levia, D. F. and Frost, E. E.: Variability of throughfall volume and solute inputs in wooded ecosystems, Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 30, 605–632, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133306071145, 2006.
Levia, D. F. and Germer, S.: A review of stemflow generation dynamics and stemflow-environment interactions in forests and shrublands, Rev. Geophys., 53, 673–714, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000479, 2015.
Levia, D. F., Michalzik, B., Näthe, K., Bischoff, S., Richter, S., and Legates, D. R.: Differential stemflow yield from European beech saplings: The role of individual canopy structure metrics, Hydrol. Process., 40, 43–51, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10124, 2014.
Li, X., Xiao, Q., Niu, J., Dymond, S., van Doorn, N. S., Yu, X., Xie, B., Lv, X., Zhang, K., and Li, J.: Process-based rainfall interception by small trees in Northern China: The effect of rainfall traits and crown structure characteristics, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 218–219, 65–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.11.017, 2016.
Liang, W. L., Li, S. L., and Hung, F. X.: Analysis of the contributions of topographic, soil, and vegetation features on the spatial distributions of surface soil moisture in a steep natural forested headwater catchment, Hydrol. Process., 31, 3796–3809, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11290, 2017.
Liang, W.-L., Kosugi, K., and Mizuyama, T.: Heterogeneous Soil Water Dynamics around a Tree Growing on a Steep Hillslope, Vadose Zone J., 6, 879–889, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0029, 2007.
Llorens, P., Poch, R., Latron, J., and Gallart, F.: Rainfall interception by a Pinus sylvestris forest patch overgrown in a Mediterranean mountainous abandoned area I. Monitoring design and results down to the event scale, J. Hydrol., 199, 331–345, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03334-3, 1997.
Lloyd, C. R. and Marques, A. D. O.: Spatial variability of throughfall and stemflow measurements in Amazonian rainforest, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 42, 63–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(88)90067-6, 1988.
Loustau, D., Berbigier, P., and Granier, A.: Interception loss, throughfall and stemflow in a maritime pine stand. II. An application of Gash's analytical model of interception, J. Hydrol., 138, 469–485, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(92)90131-E, 1992.
Magliano, P. N., Whitworth-Hulse, J. I., Florio, E. L., Aguirre, E. C., and Blanco, L. J.: Interception loss, throughfall and stemflow by Larrea divaricata: The role of rainfall characteristics and plant morphological attributes, Ecol. Res., 34, 753–764, https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12036, 2019.
Matheron, G.: Traité de géostatistique appliquée, Éditions Technip, Paris, 333 pp., https://www.sudoc.fr/004651340 (last access: 24 July 2023), 1962.
Metzger, J. C. and Hildebrandt, A.: Throughfall and rain event data, May–July 2014–2016, Hainich, Germany, project AquaDiva, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8070279, 2023.
Metzger, J. C., Wutzler, T., Dalla Valle, N., Filipzik, J., Grauer, C., Lehmann, R., Roggenbuck, M., Schelhorn, D., Weckmüller, J., Küsel, K., Totsche, K. U., Trumbore, S., and Hildebrandt, A.: Vegetation impacts soil water content patterns by shaping canopy water fluxes and soil properties, Hydrol. Process., 31, 3783–3795, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11274, 2017.
Metzger, J. C., Schumacher, J., Lange, M., and Hildebrandt, A.: Neighbourhood and stand structure affect stemflow generation in a heterogeneous deciduous temperate forest, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4433–4452, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4433-2019, 2019.
Metzger, J. C., Filipzik, J., Michalzik, B., and Hildebrandt, A.: Stemflow Infiltration Hotspots Create Soil Microsites Near Tree Stems in an Unmanaged Mixed Beech Forest, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 4, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.701293, 2021.
Metzger, J. C., Hildebrandt, A., and Filipzik, J.: High-resolution throughfall measurement design, Hainich, Germany, project AquaDiva, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8070196, 2023a.
Metzger, J. C., Hildebrandt, A., and Filipzik, J.: Soil moisture sensor network, design, location attributes and soil properties, Hainich, Germany, project AquaDiva, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8065170, 2023b.
Molina, A. J., Llorens, P., Garcia-Estringana, P., Moreno de las Heras, M., Cayuela, C., Gallart, F., and Latron, J.: Contributions of throughfall, forest and soil characteristics to near-surface soil water-content variability at the plot scale in a mountainous Mediterranean area, Sci. Total Environ., 647, 1421–1432, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.020, 2019.
Murray, S. J.: Trends in 20th century global rainfall interception as simulated by a dynamic global vegetation model: Implications for global water resources, Ecohydrology, 7, 102–114, https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1325, 2014.
Nakagawa, S. and Schielzeth, H.: A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models, Methods Ecol. Evol., 4, 133–142, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x, 2013.
Nanko, K., Keim, R. F., Hudson, S. A., and Levia, D. F.: Throughfall drop sizes suggest canopy flowpaths vary by phenophase, J. Hydrol., 612, 128144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128144, 2022.
Nespoulous, J., Merino-Martín, L., Monnier, Y., Bouchet, D. C., Ramel, M., Dombey, R., Viennois, G., Mao, Z., Zhang, J.-L., Cao, K.-F., Le Bissonnais, Y., Sidle, R. C., and Stokes, A.: Tropical forest structure and understorey determine subsurface flow through biopores formed by plant roots, Catena, 181, 104061, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.05.007, 2019.
Nimmo, J. R.: The processes of preferential flow in the unsaturated zone, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 85, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20143, 2021.
Oda, T., Egusa, T., Ohte, N., Hotta, N., Tanaka, N., Green, M. B., and Suzuki, M.: Effects of changes in canopy interception on stream runoff response and recovery following clear-cutting of a Japanese coniferous forest in Fukuroyamasawa Experimental Watershed in Japan, Hydrol. Process., 35, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14177, 2021.
Oliver, M. A. and Webster, R.: A tutorial guide to geostatistics: Computing and modelling variograms and kriging, Catena, 113, 56–69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.09.006, 2014.
Papritz, A.: georob: Robust Geostatistical Analysis of Spatial Data, R package version 0.3-13, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=georob (last access: 28 March 2020), 2020.
Park, A. and Cameron, J. L.: The influence of canopy traits on throughfall and stemflow in five tropical trees growing in a Panamanian plantation, Forest Ecol. Manag., 255, 1915–1925, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.025, 2008.
Pebesma, E. J.: Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package, Comput. Geosci., 30, 683–691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012, 2004.
Pressland, A. J.: Soil Moisture Redistribution as Affected by Throughfall and Stemflow in an Arid Zone Shrub Community, Aust. J. Bot., 24, 641–649, 1976.
Raat, K. J., Draaijers, G. P. J., Schaap, M. G., Tietema, A., and Verstraten, J. M.: Spatial variability of throughfall water and chemistry and forest floor water content in a Douglas fir forest stand, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 363–374, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-6-363-2002, 2002.
R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2016.
Ribeiro Jr., P. J. and Diggle, P. J.: geoR: A Package for Geostatistical Analysis, R-NEWS, 1, 15–18, 2001.
Rodrigues, A. F., Terra, M. C. N. S., Mantovani, V. A., Cordeiro, N. G., Ribeiro, J. P. C., Guo, L., Nehren, U., Mello, J. M., and Mello, C. R.: Throughfall spatial variability in a neotropical forest: Have we correctly accounted for time stability?, J. Hydrol., 608, 127632, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127632, 2022.
Rosenbaum, U., Bogena, H. R., Herbst, M., Huisman, J. A., Peterson, T. J., Weuthen, A., Western, A. W., and Vereecken, H.: Seasonal and event dynamics of spatial soil moisture patterns at the small catchment scale, Water Resour. Res., 48, W10544, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011518, 2012.
Savenije, H. H. G.: The importance of interception and why we should delete the term evapotranspiration from our vocabulary, Hydrol. Process., 18, 1507–1511, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5563, 2004.
Schrumpf, M., Kaiser, K., and Schulze, E.-D.: Soil Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen Gains in an Old Growth Deciduous Forest in Germany, PLoS ONE, 9, e89364, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089364, 2014.
Schume, H., Jost, G., and Katzensteiner, K.: Spatio-temporal analysis of the soil water content in a mixed Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.)-European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stand, Geoderma, 112, 273–287, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00311-7, 2003.
Schwärzel, K., Menzer, A., Clausnitzer, F., Spank, U., Häntzschel, J., Grünwald, T., Köstner, B., Bernhofer, C., and Feger, K. H.: Soil water content measurements deliver reliable estimates of water fluxes: A comparative study in a beech and a spruce stand in the Tharandt forest (Saxony, Germany), Agr. Forest Meteorol., 149, 1994–2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.07.006, 2009.
Shachnovich, Y., Berliner, P. R., and Bar, P.: Rainfall interception and spatial distribution of throughfall in a pine forest planted in an arid zone, J. Hydrol., 349, 168–177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.051, 2008.
Staelens, J., De Schrijver, A., Verheyen, K., and Verhoest, N. E. C.: Spatial variability and temporal stability of throughfall water under a dominant beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) tree in relationship to canopy cover, J. Hydrol., 330, 651–662, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.032, 2006.
Staelens, J., De Schrijver, A., Verheyen, K., and Verhoest, N. E. C.: Rainfall partitioning into throughfall, stemflow, and interception within a single beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) canopy: influence of foliation, rain event characteristics, and meteorology, Hydrol. Process., 22, 33–45, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6610, 2008.
Su, L., Xie, Z., Xu, W., and Zhao, C.: Variability of throughfall quantity in a mixed evergreen-deciduous broadleaved forest in central China, J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 67, 225–231, https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2019-0008, 2019.
Vachaud, G., Passerat De Silans, A., Balabanis, P., and Vauclin, M.: Temporal Stability of Spatially Measured Soil Water Probability Density Function, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 49, 822–828, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900040006x, 1985.
Van Stan, J. T., Lewis, E. S., Hildebrandt, A., Rebmann, C., and Friesen, J.: Impact of interacting bark structure and rainfall conditions on stemflow variability in a temperate beech-oak forest, central Germany, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 61, 2071–2083, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1083104, 2016.
Van Stan, J. T., Hildebrandt, A., Friesen, J., Metzger, J. C., and Yankine, S. A.: Spatial Variability and Temporal Stability of Local Net Precipitation Patterns, in: Precipitation Partitioning by Vegetation, edited by: Van Stan II, J. T., Gutmann, E., and Friesen, J., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 89–104, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29702-2_6, 2020.
Vereecken, H., Kamai, T., Harter, T., Kasteel, R., Hopmans, J., and Vanderborght, J.: Explaining soil moisture variability as a function of mean soil moisture: A stochastic unsaturated flow perspective, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031813, 2007.
Voss, S., Zimmermann, B., and Zimmermann, A.: Detecting spatial structures in throughfall data: The effect of extent, sample size, sampling design, and variogram estimation method, J. Hydrol., 540, 527–537, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.042, 2016.
Western, A. W., Zhou, S. L., Grayson, R. B., McMahon, T. A., Blöschl, G., and Wilson, D. J.: Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes, J. Hydrol., 286, 113–134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.014, 2004.
Wullaert, H., Pohlert, T., Boy, J., Valarezo, C., and Wilcke, W.: Spatial throughfall heterogeneity in a montane rain forest in Ecuador: Extent, temporal stability and drivers, J. Hydrol., 377, 71–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.001, 2009.
Zehe, E., Graeff, T., Morgner, M., Bauer, A., and Bronstert, A.: Plot and field scale soil moisture dynamics and subsurface wetness control on runoff generation in a headwater in the Ore Mountains, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 873–889, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-873-2010, 2010.
Zhu, X., He, Z., Du, J., Chen, L., Lin, P., and Tian, Q.: Spatial heterogeneity of throughfall and its contributions to the variability in near-surface soil water-content in semiarid mountains of China, Forest Ecol. Manag., 488, 119008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119008, 2021.
Zimmermann, A. and Zimmermann, B.: Requirements for throughfall monitoring: The roles of temporal scale and canopy complexity, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 189–190, 125–139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.01.014, 2014.
Zimmermann, A., Germer, S., Neill, C., Krusche, A. V., and Elsenbeer, H.: Spatio-temporal patterns of throughfall and solute deposition in an open tropical rain forest, J. Hydrol., 360, 87–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.028, 2008.
Zimmermann, A., Zimmermann, B., and Elsenbeer, H.: Rainfall redistribution in a tropical forest: Spatial and temporal patterns, Water Resour. Res., 45, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007470, 2009.
Zimmermann, A., Voss, S., Metzger, J. C., Hildebrandt, A., and Zimmermann, B.: Capturing heterogeneity: The role of a study area's extent for estimating mean throughfall, J. Hydrol., 542, 781–789, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.047, 2016.
Zimmermann, B., Zimmermann, A., Lark, R. M., and Elsenbeer, H.: Sampling procedures for throughfall monitoring: A simulation study, Water Resour. Res., 46, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007776, 2010.
Zuecco, G., Penna, D., van Meerveld, H. J., Hopp, L., Fontana, G. D., and Borga, M.: Comparison of two different types of throughfall collectors, Die Bodenkultur, 65, 51–56, 2014.
Short summary
Canopies change how rain reaches the soil: some spots receive more and others less water. It has long been debated whether this also leads to locally wetter and drier soil. We checked this using measurements of canopy drip and soil moisture. We found that the increase in soil water content after rain was aligned with canopy drip. Independently, the soil storage reaction was dampened in locations prone to drainage, like hig-macroporosity areas, suggesting that canopy drip enhances bypass flow.
Canopies change how rain reaches the soil: some spots receive more and others less water. It has...