Articles | Volume 27, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1961-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1961-2023
Research article
 | 
23 May 2023
Research article |  | 23 May 2023

Comparison of artificial neural networks and reservoir models for simulating karst spring discharge on five test sites in the Alpine and Mediterranean regions

Guillaume Cinkus, Andreas Wunsch, Naomi Mazzilli, Tanja Liesch, Zhao Chen, Nataša Ravbar, Joanna Doummar, Jaime Fernández-Ortega, Juan Antonio Barberá, Bartolomé Andreo, Nico Goldscheider, and Hervé Jourde

Viewed

Total article views: 2,256 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,607 600 49 2,256 25 24
  • HTML: 1,607
  • PDF: 600
  • XML: 49
  • Total: 2,256
  • BibTeX: 25
  • EndNote: 24
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Nov 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Nov 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,256 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,176 with geography defined and 80 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Numerous modelling approaches can be used for studying karst water resources, which can make it difficult for a stakeholder or researcher to choose the appropriate method. We conduct a comparison of two widely used karst modelling approaches: artificial neural networks (ANNs) and reservoir models. Results show that ANN models are very flexible and seem great for reproducing high flows. Reservoir models can work with relatively short time series and seem to accurately reproduce low flows.