Articles | Volume 26, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3941-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3941-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
01 Aug 2022
Research article |
| 01 Aug 2022
| 01 Aug 2022
Intersecting near-real time fluvial and pluvial inundation estimates with sociodemographic vulnerability to quantify a household flood impact index
Matthew Preisser
Environmental and Water Resources Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
Paola Passalacqua
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Environmental and Water Resources Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
R. Patrick Bixler
LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
Julian Hofmann
Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Jayaram Hariharan, Kyle Wright, Andrew Moodie, Nelson Tull, and Paola Passalacqua
Earth Surf. Dynam., 11, 405–427, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-405-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-405-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We simulate the transport of material through numerically simulated river deltas under natural and human-modified (embankment construction and channel dredging) scenarios to understand their impacts on material transport. Human modifications reduce the total area visited by passive particles and alter the amount of time spent within the delta relative to natural conditions. This work can help us understand how future construction may impact land building or ecosystem restoration projects.
Mariela Perignon, Jordan Adams, Irina Overeem, and Paola Passalacqua
Earth Surf. Dynam., 8, 809–824, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-8-809-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-8-809-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a machine learning approach for the classification and analysis of large delta systems. The approach uses remotely sensed data, channel network extraction, and the analysis of 10 metrics to identify clusters of islands with similar characteristics. The 12 clusters are grouped in six main classes related to morphological processes acting on the system. The approach allows us to identify spatial patterns in large river deltas to inform modeling and the collection of field observations.
M. Liang, N. Geleynse, D. A. Edmonds, and P. Passalacqua
Earth Surf. Dynam., 3, 87–104, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-87-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-3-87-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we assess the flow-routing component (FlowRCM) of our delta formation model, DeltaRCM. We found that with the level of complexity reduction, FlowRCM is able to produce channel network-scale hydrodynamic details, which provide further insights into the connection between delta flow structures and the morphodynamic outcome.
Related subject area
Subject: Urban Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
An optimized long short-term memory (LSTM)-based approach applied to early warning and forecasting of ponding in the urban drainage system
A deep-learning-technique-based data-driven model for accurate and rapid flood predictions in temporal and spatial dimensions
Impact of urban geology on model simulations of shallow groundwater levels and flow paths
Technical note: Modeling spatial fields of extreme precipitation – a hierarchical Bayesian approach
Forecasting green roof detention performance by temporal downscaling of precipitation time-series projections
Evaluating different machine learning methods to simulate runoff from extensive green roofs
Modeling and interpreting hydrological responses of sustainable urban drainage systems with explainable machine learning methods
The impact of the spatiotemporal structure of rainfall on flood frequency over a small urban watershed: an approach coupling stochastic storm transposition and hydrologic modeling
Space variability impacts on hydrological responses of nature-based solutions and the resulting uncertainty: a case study of Guyancourt (France)
Urban surface water flood modelling – a comprehensive review of current models and future challenges
Resampling and ensemble techniques for improving ANN-based high-flow forecast accuracy
Event selection and two-stage approach for calibrating models of green urban drainage systems
Modeling the high-resolution dynamic exposure to flooding in a city region
Drainage area characterization for evaluating green infrastructure using the Storm Water Management Model
Critical scales to explain urban hydrological response: an application in Cranbrook, London
Increase in flood risk resulting from climate change in a developed urban watershed – the role of storm temporal patterns
Patterns and comparisons of human-induced changes in river flood impacts in cities
Scale effect challenges in urban hydrology highlighted with a distributed hydrological model
Comparison of the impacts of urban development and climate change on exposing European cities to pluvial flooding
Spatial and temporal variability of rainfall and their effects on hydrological response in urban areas – a review
Hydrodynamics of pedestrians' instability in floodwaters
Formulating and testing a method for perturbing precipitation time series to reflect anticipated climatic changes
Using rainfall thresholds and ensemble precipitation forecasts to issue and improve urban inundation alerts
Enhancing the T-shaped learning profile when teaching hydrology using data, modeling, and visualization activities
On the sensitivity of urban hydrodynamic modelling to rainfall spatial and temporal resolution
Precipitation variability within an urban monitoring network via microcanonical cascade generators
Estimation of peak discharges of historical floods
Indirect downscaling of hourly precipitation based on atmospheric circulation and temperature
Assessing the hydrologic restoration of an urbanized area via an integrated distributed hydrological model
Using the Storm Water Management Model to predict urban headwater stream hydrological response to climate and land cover change
Evaluating scale and roughness effects in urban flood modelling using terrestrial LIDAR data
Contribution of directly connected and isolated impervious areas to urban drainage network hydrographs
Thermal management of an unconsolidated shallow urban groundwater body
Online multistep-ahead inundation depth forecasts by recurrent NARX networks
A statistical analysis of insurance damage claims related to rainfall extremes
Joint impact of rainfall and tidal level on flood risk in a coastal city with a complex river network: a case study of Fuzhou City, China
Urbanization and climate change impacts on future urban flooding in Can Tho city, Vietnam
Multi-objective optimization for combined quality–quantity urban runoff control
Development of flood probability charts for urban drainage network in coastal areas through a simplified joint assessment approach
Auto-control of pumping operations in sewerage systems by rule-based fuzzy neural networks
Coupling urban event-based and catchment continuous modelling for combined sewer overflow river impact assessment
Dynamic neural networks for real-time water level predictions of sewerage systems-covering gauged and ungauged sites
Wen Zhu, Tao Tao, Hexiang Yan, Jieru Yan, Jiaying Wang, Shuping Li, and Kunlun Xin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2035–2050, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2035-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2035-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To provide a possibility for early warning and forecasting of ponding in the urban drainage system, an optimized long short-term memory (LSTM)-based model is proposed in this paper. It has a remarkable improvement compared to the models based on LSTM and convolutional neural network (CNN) structures. The performance of the corrected model is reliable if the number of monitoring sites is over one per hectare. Increasing the number of monitoring points further has little impact on the performance.
Qianqian Zhou, Shuai Teng, Zuxiang Situ, Xiaoting Liao, Junman Feng, Gongfa Chen, Jianliang Zhang, and Zonglei Lu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1791–1808, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1791-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1791-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A deep-learning-based data-driven model for flood predictions in temporal and spatial dimensions, with the integration of a long short-term memory network, Bayesian optimization, and transfer learning is proposed. The model accurately predicts water depths and flood time series/dynamics for hyetograph inputs, with substantial improvements in computational time. With transfer learning, the model was well applied to a new case study and showed robust compatibility and generalization ability.
Ane LaBianca, Mette H. Mortensen, Peter Sandersen, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Karsten H. Jensen, and Jacob Kidmose
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1645–1666, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1645-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1645-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The study explores the effect of Anthropocene geology and the computational grid size on the simulation of shallow urban groundwater. Many cities are facing challenges with high groundwater levels close to the surface, yet urban planning and development seldom consider its impact on the groundwater resource. This study illustrates that the urban subsurface infrastructure significantly affects the groundwater flow paths and the residence time of shallow urban groundwater.
Bianca Rahill-Marier, Naresh Devineni, and Upmanu Lall
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5685–5695, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5685-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5685-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new approach to modeling extreme regional rainfall by considering the spatial structure of extreme events. The developed models allow a probabilistic exploration of how the regional drainage network may respond to extreme rainfall events and provide a foundation for how future risks may be better estimated.
Vincent Pons, Rasmus Benestad, Edvard Sivertsen, Tone Merete Muthanna, and Jean-Luc Bertrand-Krajewski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2855–2874, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2855-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2855-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Different models were developed to increase the temporal resolution of precipitation time series to minutes. Their applicability under climate change and their suitability for producing input time series for green infrastructure (e.g. green roofs) modelling were evaluated. The robustness of the model was validated against a range of European climates in eight locations in France and Norway. The future hydrological performances of green roofs were evaluated in order to improve design practice.
Elhadi Mohsen Hassan Abdalla, Vincent Pons, Virginia Stovin, Simon De-Ville, Elizabeth Fassman-Beck, Knut Alfredsen, and Tone Merete Muthanna
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5917–5935, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5917-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5917-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigated the potential of using machine learning algorithms as hydrological models of green roofs across different climatic condition. The study provides comparison between conceptual and machine learning algorithms. Machine learning models were found to be accurate in simulating runoff from extensive green roofs.
Yang Yang and Ting Fong May Chui
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5839–5858, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5839-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5839-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses explainable machine learning methods to model and interpret the statistical correlations between rainfall and the discharge of urban catchments with sustainable urban drainage systems. The resulting models have good prediction accuracies. However, the right predictions may be made for the wrong reasons as the model cannot provide physically plausible explanations as to why a prediction is made.
Zhengzheng Zhou, James A. Smith, Mary Lynn Baeck, Daniel B. Wright, Brianne K. Smith, and Shuguang Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4701–4717, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4701-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4701-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The role of rainfall space–time structure in flood response is an important research issue in urban hydrology. This study contributes to this understanding in small urban watersheds. Combining stochastically based rainfall scenarios with a hydrological model, the results show the complexities of flood response for various return periods, implying the common assumptions of spatially uniform rainfall in urban flood frequency are problematic, even for relatively small basin scales.
Yangzi Qiu, Igor da Silva Rocha Paz, Feihu Chen, Pierre-Antoine Versini, Daniel Schertzer, and Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3137–3162, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3137-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3137-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Our original research objective is to investigate the uncertainties of the hydrological responses of nature-based solutions (NBSs) that result from the multiscale space variability in both the rainfall and the NBS distribution. Results show that the intersection effects of spatial variability in rainfall and the spatial arrangement of NBS can generate uncertainties of peak flow and total runoff volume estimations in NBS scenarios.
Kaihua Guo, Mingfu Guan, and Dapeng Yu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2843–2860, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2843-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2843-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a comprehensive review of models and emerging approaches for predicting urban surface water flooding driven by intense rainfall. It explores the advantages and limitations of existing models and identifies major challenges. Issues of model complexities, scale effects, and computational efficiency are also analysed. The results will inform scientists, engineers, and decision-makers of the latest developments and guide the model selection based on desired objectives.
Everett Snieder, Karen Abogadil, and Usman T. Khan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2543–2566, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2543-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2543-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Flow distributions are highly skewed, resulting in low prediction accuracy of high flows when using artificial neural networks for flood forecasting. We investigate the use of resampling and ensemble techniques to address the problem of skewed datasets to improve high flow prediction. The methods are implemented both independently and in combined, hybrid techniques. This research presents the first analysis of the effects of combining these methods on high flow prediction accuracy.
Ico Broekhuizen, Günther Leonhardt, Jiri Marsalek, and Maria Viklander
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 869–885, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-869-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-869-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Urban drainage models are usually calibrated using a few events so that they accurately represent a real-world site. This paper compares 14 single- and two-stage strategies for selecting these events and found significant variation between them in terms of model performance and the obtained values of model parameters. Calibrating parameters for green and impermeable areas in two separate stages improved model performance in the validation period while making calibration easier and faster.
Xuehong Zhu, Qiang Dai, Dawei Han, Lu Zhuo, Shaonan Zhu, and Shuliang Zhang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3353–3372, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3353-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3353-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Urban flooding exposure is generally investigated with the assumption of stationary disasters and disaster-hit bodies during an event, and thus it cannot satisfy the increasingly elaborate modeling and management of urban floods. In this study, a comprehensive method was proposed to simulate dynamic exposure to urban flooding considering human mobility. Several scenarios, including diverse flooding types and various responses of residents to flooding, were considered.
Joong Gwang Lee, Christopher T. Nietch, and Srinivas Panguluri
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2615–2635, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2615-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2615-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper demonstrates an approach to spatial discretization for analyzing green infrastructure (GI) using SWMM. Besides DCIA, pervious buffers should be identified for GI modeling. Runoff contributions from different spatial components and flow pathways would impact GI performance. The presented approach can reduce the number of calibration parameters and apply scale–independently to a watershed scale. Hydrograph separation can add insights for developing GI scenarios.
Elena Cristiano, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Santiago Gaitan, Susana Ochoa Rodriguez, and Nick van de Giesen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2425–2447, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2425-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2425-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we investigate the influence rainfall and catchment scales have on hydrological response. This problem is quite relevant in urban areas, where the response is fast due to the high degree of imperviousness. We presented a new approach to classify rainfall variability in space and time and use this classification to investigate rainfall aggregation effects on urban hydrological response. This classification allows the spatial extension of the main core of the storm to be identified.
Suresh Hettiarachchi, Conrad Wasko, and Ashish Sharma
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2041–2056, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2041-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2041-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The study examines the impact of higher temperatures expected in a future climate on how rainfall varies with time during severe storm events. The results show that these impacts increase future flood risk in urban environments and that current design guidelines need to be adjusted so that effective adaptation measures can be implemented.
Stephanie Clark, Ashish Sharma, and Scott A. Sisson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1793–1810, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1793-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1793-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates global patterns relating urban river flood impacts to socioeconomic development and changing hydrologic conditions, and comparisons are provided between 98 individual cities. This paper condenses and communicates large amounts of information to accelerate the understanding of relationships between local urban conditions and global processes, and to potentially motivate knowledge transfer between decision-makers facing similar circumstances.
Abdellah Ichiba, Auguste Gires, Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia, Daniel Schertzer, Philippe Bompard, and Marie-Claire Ten Veldhuis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 331–350, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-331-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-331-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This paper proposes a two-step investigation to illustrate the extent of scale effects in urban hydrology. First, fractal tools are used to highlight the scale dependency observed within GIS data inputted in urban hydrological models. Then an intensive multi-scale modelling work was carried out to confirm effects on model performances. The model was implemented at 17 spatial resolutions ranging from 100 to 5 m. Results allow the understanding of scale challenges in hydrology modelling.
Per Skougaard Kaspersen, Nanna Høegh Ravn, Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Henrik Madsen, and Martin Drews
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4131–4147, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4131-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4131-2017, 2017
Elena Cristiano, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, and Nick van de Giesen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3859–3878, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3859-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3859-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
In the last decades, new instruments were developed to measure rainfall and hydrological processes at high resolution. Weather radars are used, for example, to measure how rainfall varies in space and time. At the same time, new models were proposed to reproduce and predict hydrological response, in order to prevent flooding in urban areas. This paper presents a review of our current knowledge of rainfall and hydrological processes in urban areas, focusing on their variability in time and space.
Chiara Arrighi, Hocine Oumeraci, and Fabio Castelli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 515–531, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-515-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-515-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
In developed countries, the majority of fatalities during floods occurs as a consequence of inappropriate high-risk behaviour such as walking or driving in floodwaters. This work addresses pedestrians' instability in floodwaters. It analyses both the contribution of flood and human physical characteristics in the loss of stability highlighting the key role of subject height (submergence) and flow regime. The method consists of a re-analysis of experiments and numerical modelling.
Hjalte Jomo Danielsen Sørup, Stylianos Georgiadis, Ida Bülow Gregersen, and Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 345–355, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-345-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-345-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we propose a methodology changing present-day precipitation time series to reflect future changed climate. Present-day time series have a much finer resolution than what is provided by climate models and thus have a much broader application range. The proposed methodology is able to replicate most expectations of climate change precipitation. These time series can be used to run fine-scale hydrological and hydraulic models and thereby assess the influence of climate change on them.
Tsun-Hua Yang, Gong-Do Hwang, Chin-Cheng Tsai, and Jui-Yi Ho
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4731–4745, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4731-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4731-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Taiwan continues to suffer from floods. This study proposes the integration of rainfall thresholds and ensemble precipitation forecasts to provide probabilistic urban inundation forecasts. Utilization of ensemble precipitation forecasts can extend forecast lead times to 72 h, preceding peak flows and allowing response agencies to take necessary preparatory measures. This study also develops a hybrid of real-time observation and rainfall forecasts to improve the first 24 h inundation forecasts.
Christopher A. Sanchez, Benjamin L. Ruddell, Roy Schiesser, and Venkatesh Merwade
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1289–1299, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1289-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1289-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The use of authentic learning activities is especially important for place-based geosciences like hydrology, where professional breadth and technical depth are critical for practicing hydrologists. The current study found that integrating computerized learning content into the learning experience, using only a simple spreadsheet tool and readily available hydrological data, can effectively bring the "real world" into the classroom and provide an enriching educational experience.
G. Bruni, R. Reinoso, N. C. van de Giesen, F. H. L. R. Clemens, and J. A. E. ten Veldhuis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 691–709, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-691-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-691-2015, 2015
P. Licznar, C. De Michele, and W. Adamowski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 485–506, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-485-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-485-2015, 2015
J. Herget, T. Roggenkamp, and M. Krell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4029–4037, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4029-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4029-2014, 2014
F. Beck and A. Bárdossy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4851–4863, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4851-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4851-2013, 2013
D. H. Trinh and T. F. M. Chui
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4789–4801, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4789-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4789-2013, 2013
J. Y. Wu, J. R. Thompson, R. K. Kolka, K. J. Franz, and T. W. Stewart
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4743–4758, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4743-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4743-2013, 2013
H. Ozdemir, C. C. Sampson, G. A. M. de Almeida, and P. D. Bates
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4015–4030, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4015-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4015-2013, 2013
Y. Seo, N.-J. Choi, and A. R. Schmidt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3473–3483, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3473-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3473-2013, 2013
J. Epting, F. Händel, and P. Huggenberger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1851–1869, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1851-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1851-2013, 2013
H.-Y. Shen and L.-C. Chang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 935–945, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-935-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-935-2013, 2013
M. H. Spekkers, M. Kok, F. H. L. R. Clemens, and J. A. E. ten Veldhuis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 913–922, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-913-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-913-2013, 2013
J. J. Lian, K. Xu, and C. Ma
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 679–689, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-679-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-679-2013, 2013
H. T. L. Huong and A. Pathirana
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 379–394, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-379-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-379-2013, 2013
S. Oraei Zare, B. Saghafian, and A. Shamsai
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 4531–4542, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4531-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4531-2012, 2012
R. Archetti, A. Bolognesi, A. Casadio, and M. Maglionico
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3115–3122, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3115-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3115-2011, 2011
Y.-M. Chiang, L.-C. Chang, M.-J. Tsai, Y.-F. Wang, and F.-J. Chang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 185–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-185-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-185-2011, 2011
I. Andrés-Doménech, J. C. Múnera, F. Francés, and J. B. Marco
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2057–2072, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2057-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2057-2010, 2010
Yen-Ming Chiang, Li-Chiu Chang, Meng-Jung Tsai, Yi-Fung Wang, and Fi-John Chang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1309–1319, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1309-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1309-2010, 2010
Cited articles
Abbas, H. B. and Routray, J. K.: Vulnerability to flood-induced public health
risks in Sudan, Disast. Prevent. Manage., 23, 395–419,
https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-07-2013-0112, 2014. a
Agard, J. and Schipper, E. L. F.: Glossary, Annex II, in: Managing the Risks
of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Birkmann,
J., Campos, M., Dubeux, C., Nojiri, Y., Olsson, L., Osman-Elasha, B.,
Pelling, M., Prather, M., Rivera-Ferre, M., Ruppel, O., Sallenger, A., Smith,
K., and St. Clair, A., Cambridge Univesrity Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, 1757–1776, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-3780(06)00031-8, 2012. a
Ahmed, F., Khan, M. S. A., Warner, J., Moors, E., and Terwisscha Van Scheltinga, C.: Integrated Adaptation Tipping Points (IATPs) for urban flood resilience, Environ. Urbaniz., 30, 575–596, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818776510, 2018a. a
Ahmed, F., Moors, E., Khan, M. S. A., Warner, J., and Terwisscha van Scheltinga, C.: Tipping points in adaptation to urban flooding under
climate change and urban growth: The case of the Dhaka megacity, Land Use
Policy, 79, 496–506, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.051, 2018b. a
Antoine, M., Javaux, M., and Bielders, C.: What indicators can capture
runoff-relevant connectivity properties of the micro-topography at the plot
scale?, Adv. Water Resour., 32, 1297–1310, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.05.006, 2009. a
Appels, W. M., Bogaart, P. W., and van der Zee, S. E.: Influence of spatial
variations of microtopography and infiltration on surface runoff and field
scale hydrological connectivity, Adv. in Water Resour., 34, 303–313, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.12.003, 2011. a
Bachmann, D.: Beitrag zur Entwicklung eines Entscheidungsunterstützungssystems zur Bewertung und Planung von Hochwasserschutzmaßnahmen, PhD thesis, Institut für Wasserbau und Wasserwirtschaft, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, https://d-nb.info/1023005069/34
(last access: 15 March 2022), 2012. a
Bachmann, D.: ProMaIDes: State-of-the Science Flood Risk Management Tool,
https://promaides.h2.de/promaides/ (last access: 15 March 2022), 2021. a
Bakkensen, L. A., Fox-Lent, C., Read, L. K., and Linkov, I.: Validating
Resilience and Vulnerability Indices in the Context of Natural Disasters,
Risk Anal., 37, 982–1004, https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12677, 2017. a
Barnes, R.: r-barnes/Barnes2020-FillSpillMerge, GitHub [code], https://github.com/r-barnes/Barnes2020-FillSpillMerge, last access: 28 July 2022. a
Barnes, R., Callaghan, K. L., and Wickert, A. D.: Computing water flow through complex landscapes – Part 2: Finding hierarchies in depressions and morphological segmentations, Earth Surf. Dynam., 8, 431–445, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-8-431-2020, 2020. a
Bates, P. D., Quinn, N., Sampson, C., Smith, A., Wing, O., Sosa, J., Savage,
J., Olcese, G., Neal, J., Schumann, G., Giustarini, L., Coxon, G., Porter,
J. R., Amodeo, M. F., Chu, Z., Lewis-Gruss, S., Freeman, N. B., Houser, T.,
Delgado, M., Hamidi, A., Bolliger, I., McCusker, K., Emanuel, K., Ferreira, C. M., Khalid, A., Haigh, I. D., Couasnon, A., Kopp, R., Hsiang, S., and Krajewski, W. F.: Combined Modeling of US Fluvial, Pluvial, and Coastal Flood Hazard Under Current and Future Climates, Water Resour. Res., 57, 1–29, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028673, 2021. a, b, c
Bermúdez, M., Ntegeka, V., Wolfs, V., and Willems, P.: Development and
Comparison of Two Fast Surrogate Models for Urban Pluvial Flood Simulations,
Water Resour. Manage., 32, 2801–2815, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1959-8, 2018. a
Bernini, A. and Franchini, M.: A Rapid Model for Delimiting Flooded Areas,
Water Resour. Manage., 27, 3825–3846, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0383-3, 2013. a, b
Bin, O. and Kruse, J. B.: Real Estate Market Response to Coastal Flood
Hazards, Nat. Hazards Rev., 7, 137–144, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2006)7:4(137), 2006. a
Bixler, R. P., Yang, E., Richter, S. M., and Coudert, M.: Boundary crossing for urban community resilience: A social vulnerability and multi-hazard approach in Austin, Texas, USA, Int. J. Disast. Risk Reduct., 66, 102613, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102613, 2021. a, b, c, d
Bulti, D. T. and Abebe, B. G.: A review of flood modeling methods for urban
pluvial flood application, Model. Earth Syst. Environ., 6, 1293–1302, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00803-z, 2020a. a
Bulti, D. T. and Abebe, B. G.: A review of flood modeling methods for urban
pluvial flood application, Model. Earth Syst. Environ., 6, 1293–1302, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00803-z, 2020b. a
Burton, C. and Cutter, S. L.: Levee Failures and Social Vulnerability in the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Area, California, Nat. Hazards Rev., 9, 136–149, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2008)9:3(136), 2008. a, b
Burton, C. G.: Social Vulnerability and Hurricane Impact Modeling, Nat.
Hazards Rev., 11, 58–68, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2010)11:2(58), 2010. a
Calianno, M., Ruin, I., and Gourley, J. J.: Supplementing flash flood reports
with impact classifications, J. Hydrol., 477, 1–16,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.036, 2013. a
Callaghan, K. L. and Wickert, A. D.: Computing water flow through complex
landscapes – Part 1: Incorporating depressions in flow routing using
FlowFill, Earth Surf. Dynam., 7, 737–753, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-737-2019, 2019. a, b
Cardona, O. D., Van Aalst, M. K., Birkmann, J., Fordham, M., Mc Gregor, G., Rosa, P., Pulwarty, R. S., Schipper, E. L. F., Sinh, B. T., Décamps, H., Keim, M., Davis, I., Ebi, K. L., Lavell, A., Mechler, R., Murray, V., Pelling, M., Pohl, J., Smith, A. O., and Thomalla, F.: Determinants of risk:
Exposure and vulnerability, in: Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and
Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge Univesrity Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, 65–108, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177245.005, 2012. a, b, c, d
Chakraborty, J., Collins, T. W., Montgomery, M. C., and Grineski, S. E.:
Social and Spatial Inequities in Exposure to Flood Risk in Miami, Florida,
Nat. Hazards Rev., 15, 04014006, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000140, 2014. a, b, c, d
Chu, X., Yang, J., Chi, Y., and Zhang, J.: Dynamic puddle delineation and
modeling of puddle-to-puddle filling-spilling-merging-splitting overland flow
processes, Water Resour. Res., 49, 3825–3829, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20286, 2013a. a, b
Chu, X., Yang, J., Chi, Y., and Zhang, J.: Dynamic puddle delineation and
modeling of puddle-to-puddle filling-spilling-merging-splitting overland flow
processes, Water Resour. Res., 49, 3825–3829, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20286, 2013b. a
Collins, T. W., Grineski, S. E., Chakraborty, J., Montgomery, M. C., and
Hernandez, M.: Downscaling Environmental Justice Analysis: Determinants of
Household-Level Hazardous Air Pollutant Exposure in Greater Houston, Ann.
Assoc. Am. Geogr., 105, 684–703, https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1050754, 2015. a
Collins, T. W., Grineski, S. E., Chakraborty, J., and Flores, A. B.:
Environmental injustice and Hurricane Harvey: A household-level study of
socially disparate flood exposures in Greater Houston, Texas, USA, Environ. Res., 179, 108772, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108772, 2019. a
Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B., and Shirley, W. L.: Social vulnerability to
environmental hazards, Social Sci. Quart., 84, 242–261,
https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002, 2003. a, b
Cutter, S. L., Emrich, C. T., Morath, D. P., and Dunning, C. M.: Integrating
social vulnerability into federal flood risk management planning, J. Flood Risk Manage., 6, 332–344, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12018, 2013. a, b
de Carvalho Júnior, O. A., Guimarães, R. F., Montgomery, D. R.,
Gillespie, A. R., Gomes, R. A. T., Martins, É. D. S., and Silva, N. C.:
Karst depression detection using ASTER, ALOS/PRISM and SRTM-derived digital
elevation models in the Bambuí group, Brazil, Remote Sens., 6, 330–351, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6010330, 2013. a
de Moel, H. and Aerts, J. C.: Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates, Nat. Hazards, 58,
407–425, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9675-6, 2011. a
Downton, M. W., Morss, R. E., Wilhelmi, O. V., Gruntfest, E., and Higgins, M. L.: Interactions between scientific uncertainty and flood management
decisions: Two case studies in Colorado, Environ. Hazards, 6, 134–146,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2006.05.003, 2005. a
Fahy, B., Brenneman, E., Chang, H., and Shandas, V.: Spatial analysis of urban flooding and extreme heat hazard potential in Portland, OR, Int. J. Disast. Risk Reduct., 39, 101117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101117, 2019. a
Falconer, R. H., Cobby, D., Smyth, P., Astle, G., Dent, J., and Golding, B.:
Pluvial flooding: New approaches in flood warning, mapping and risk management, J. Flood Risk Manage., 2, 198–208, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01034.x, 2009. a
Fekete, A.: Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to
river-floods in Germany, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 393–403, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-393-2009, 2009. a
Fielding, J. and Burningham, K.: Environmental inequality and flood hazard,
Local Environ., 10, 379–395, https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830500160875, 2005. a
Finch, C., Emrich, C. T., and Cutter, S. L.: Disaster disparities and
differential recovery in New Orleans, Populat. Environ., 31, 179–202, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-009-0099-8, 2010. a
Flanagan, B. E., Gregory, E. W., Hallisey, E. J., Heitgerd, J. L., and Lewis,
B.: A Social Vulnerability Index for Disaster Management, J. Homeland Secur. Emerg. Manage., 8, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1792, 2011. a
Freni, G., La Loggia, G., and Notaro, V.: Uncertainty in urban flood damage
assessment due to urban drainage modelling and depth-damage curve estimation, Water Sci. Technol., 61, 2979–2993, https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.177, 2010. a
Fritsch, K., Assmann, A., and Tyrna, B.: Long-term experiences with pluvial
flood risk management, in: E3S Web of Conferences, 7,
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160704017, 2016. a
Grahn, T. and Nyberg, L.: Assessment of pluvial flood exposure and
vulnerability of residential areas, Int. J. Disast. Risk Reduct., 21, 367–375, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.016, 2017. a
Grimm, C., Wöffler, T., Bachmann, D., and Schüttrumpf, H.: Risk
management in coastal engineering: Applied coastal research projects for
Northern Germany, Wasser Abfall, 14, 53–55, 2012. a
Guo, K., Guan, M., and Yu, D.: Urban surface water flood modelling – a
comprehensive review of current models and future challenges, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2843–2860, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2843-2021, 2021. a
Hapuarachchi, H. A. P., Wang, Q. J., and Pagano, T. C.: A review of advances
in flash flood forecasting, Hydrol. Process., 2784, 2771–2784, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8040, 2011. a
Houston, D., Werrity, A., Bassett, D., Geddes, A., Hoolachan, A., and McMillan, M.: Pluvial(rain-related) flooding in urban areas: the invisible hazard, Joseph Rowntree Foundation,
https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/pluvial-rain-related-flooding-urban-areas-invisible-hazard#jl_downloads_0
(last access: 15 March 2022), 2011. a
ISDR: UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk, Tech. rep., ISDR,
https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501701498-008, 2009. a, b
Jenson, S. K. and Domingue, J. O.: Extracting topographic structure from
digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis, Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens., 54, 1593–1600, 1988. a
Johnson, M. J., Munasinghe, D., Eyelade, D., and Cohen, S.: An integrated
evaluation of the National Water Model (NWM)–Height above nearest drainage (HAND) flood mapping methodology, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2405–2420, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2405-2019, 2019. a
Kaźmierczak, A. and Cavan, G.: Surface water flooding risk to urban
communities: Analysis of vulnerability, hazard and exposure, Landsc. Urban Plan., 103, 185–197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.008, 2011. a
Kron, W.: Flood risk = hazard ⋅ values ⋅ vulnerability, Water Int., 30, 58–68, https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060508691837, 2005. a
Le, P. V. V. and Kumar, P.: Power law scaling of topographic depressions and
their hydrologic connectivity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1553–1559,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL059114, 2014. a
Lee, D. and Jung, J.: The growth of low-income population in floodplains: A
case study of Austin, TX, KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 18, 683–693,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0205-z, 2014. a
Lewin, J. and Ashworth, P. J.: The negative relief of large river floodplains, Earth-Sci. Rev., 129, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.10.014, 2014. a
Li, S., MacMillan, R. A., Lobb, D. A., McConkey, B. G., Moulin, A., and Fraser, W. R.: Lidar DEM error analyses and topographic depression identification in a hummocky landscape in the prairie region of Canada, Geomorphology, 129, 263–275, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.02.020, 2011. a
Lindsay, J. B. and Creed, I. F.: Removal of artifact depressions from digital
elevation models: Towards a minimum impact approach, Hydrol. Process., 19, 3113–3126, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5835, 2005. a
Luke, A., Sanders, B. F., Goodrich, K. A., Feldman, D. L., Boudreau, D.,
Eguiarte, A., Serrano, K., Reyes, A., Schubert, J. E., Aghakouchak, A.,
Basolo, V., and Matthew, R. A.: Going beyond the flood insurance rate map:
Insights from flood hazard map co-production, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1097–1120, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1097-2018, 2018. a, b, c
Martz, L. W. and Garbrecht, J.: An outlet breaching algorithm for the
treatment of closed depressions in a raster DEM, Comput. Geosci., 25, 835–844, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(99)00018-7, 1999. a
McCarthy, S., Tunstall, S., Parker, D., Faulkner, H., and Howe, J.: Risk
communication in emergency response to a simulated extreme flood, Environ. Hazards, 7, 179–192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.06.003, 2007. a
McGrath, H., Bourgon, J. F., Proulx-Bourque, J. S., Nastev, M., and Abo El
Ezz, A.: A comparison of simplified conceptual models for rapid web-based
flood inundation mapping, Nat. Hazards, 93, 905–920, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3331-y, 2018. a
Metz, M., Mitasova, H., and Harmon, R. S.: Efficient extraction of drainage
networks from massive, radar-based elevation models with least cost path
search, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 667–678,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-667-2011, 2011. a
Middelmann-Fernandes, M. H.: Flood damage estimation beyond stage-damage
functions: An Australian example, J. Flood Risk Manage., 3, 88–96, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01058.x, 2010. a
Ming, X., Liang, Q., Xia, X., Li, D., and Fowler, H. J.: Real-Time Flood
Forecasting Based on a High-Performance 2-D Hydrodynamic Model and Numerical
Weather Predictions, Water Resour. Res., 56, 7, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025583, 2020. a, b, c
Moftakhari, H. R., AghaKouchak, A., Sanders, B. F., Allaire, M., and Matthew,
R. A.: What Is Nuisance Flooding? Defining and Monitoring an Emerging
Challenge, Water Resour. Res., 54, 4218–4227, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022828, 2018. a, b, c
Muthusamy, M., Casado, M. R., Salmoral, G., Irvine, T., and Leinster, P.: A remote sensing based integrated approach to quantify the impact
of fluvial and pluvial flooding in an urban catchment, Remote Sens., 11, 577, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11050577, 2019. a
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine: Framing the
Challenge of Urban Flooding in the United States, The National Academies
Press, Washington, DC, https://doi.org/10.17226/25381, 2019. a
Nelson, K. S., Abkowitz, M. D., and Camp, J. V.: A method for creating high
resolution maps of social vulnerability in the context of environmental
hazards, Appl. Geogr., 63, 89–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.06.011, 2015. a, b, c, d
Nobre, A. D., Cuartas, L. A., Hodnett, M., Rennó, C. D., Rodrigues, G.,
Silveira, A., Waterloo, M., and Saleska, S.: Height Above the Nearest Drainage – a hydrologically relevant new terrain model, J. Hydrol., 404, 13–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.051, 2011. a, b
PassaH2O Group: passaH2O/GeoFlood, GitHub [code], https://github.com/passaH2O/GeoFlood, last access: 28 July 2022. a
Passalacqua, P., Do Trung, T., Foufoula-Georgiou, E., Sapiro, G., and
Dietrich, W. E.: A geometric framework for channel network extraction from
lidar: Nonlinear diffusion and geodesic paths, J. Geophys. Res., 115, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jf001254, 2010. a, b
Peduzzi, P.: The Disaster Risk, Global Change, and Sustainability Nexus,
Sustainability (Switzerland), 11, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040957, 2019. a
Pregnolato, M., Ford, A., Wilkinson, S. M., and Dawson, R. J.: The impact of
flooding on road transport: A depth-disruption function, Transport. Res. Pt. D, 55, 67–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.020, 2017. a
Preisser, M., Passalacqua, P., Bixler, R. P., and Hofmann, J.: Data, Scripts, and Results for “Intersecting Near-Real Time Fluvial and Pluvial Inundation Estimates with Sociodemographic Vulnerability to Quantify a Household Flood Impact Index”. In Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Zenodo [data set and code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6584401, 2022. a
Rolfe, M. I., Pit, S. W., McKenzie, J. W., Longman, J., Matthews, V., Bailie,
R., and Morgan, G. G.: Social vulnerability in a high-risk flood-affected
rural region of NSW, Australia, Nat. Hazards, 101, 631–650,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03887-z, 2020. a
Rufat, S., Tate, E., Burton, C. G., and Maroof, A. S.: Social vulnerability to floods: Review of case studies and implications for measurement, Int. J. Disast. Risk Reduct., 14, 470–486, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.013, 2015. a, b
Rufat, S., Tate, E., Emrich, C. T., and Antolini, F.: How Valid Are Social
Vulnerability Models?, Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr., 109, 1131–1153, https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1535887, 2019. a
Sangireddy, H., Carothers, R. A., Stark, C. P., and Passalacqua, P.: Controls
of climate, topography, vegetation, and lithology on drainage density
extracted from high resolution topography data, J. Hydrol., 537, 271–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.051, 2016. a
Schumann, G., Frye, S., Wells, G., Adler, R., Brakenridge, R., Bolten, J.,
Murray, J., Slayback, D., Policelli, F., Kirschbaum, D., Wu, H., Cappelaere,
P., Howard, T., Flamig, Z., Clark, R., Stough, T., Chini, M., Matgen, P.,
Green, D., and Jones, B.: Unlocking the full potential of Earth observation
during the 2015 Texas flood disaster, Water Resour. Res., 52, 3288–3293, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018428, 2016. a
Soille, P., Vogt, J., and Colombo, R.: Carving and adaptive drainage
enforcement of grid digital elevation models, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001879, 2003. a
Syvitski, J. P., Overeem, I., Brakenridge, G. R., and Hannon, M.: Floods,
floodplains, delta plains – A satellite imaging approach, Sediment. Geol., 267–268, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2012.05.014, 2012. a
Tate, E.: Uncertainty Analysis for a Social Vulnerability Index, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 103, 526–543, https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.700616, 2013. a
Tate, E., Strong, A., Kraus, T., and Xiong, H.: Flood recovery and property
acquisition in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Nat. Hazards, 80, 2055–2079,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2060-8, 2016. a
Tate, E., Rahman, M. A., Emrich, C. T., and Sampson, C. C.: Flood exposure and social vulnerability in the United States, Nat. Hazards, 106, 435–457,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04470-2, 2021. a, b, c, d
Tellman, B., Schank, C., Schwarz, B., Howe, P. D., and de Sherbinin, A.: Using disaster outcomes to validate components of social vulnerability to floods: Flood deaths and property damage across the USA, Sustainability
(Switzerland), 12, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156006, 2020. a, b
Teng, J., Jakeman, A. J., Vaze, J., Croke, B. F., Dutta, D., and Kim, S.:
Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and
uncertainty analysis, Environ. Model. Softw., 90, 201–216,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006, 2017. a
Tsai, C. W.: Applicability of Kinematic, Noninertia, and Quasi-Steady Dynamic
Wave Models to Unsteady Flow Routing, J. Hydraul. Eng., 129, 613–627, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:8(613), 2003.
a
Tsakiris, G.: Flood risk assessment: Concepts, modelling, applications, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1361–1369, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1361-2014, 2014. a, b, c
Ueland, J. and Warf, B.: Racialized Topographies: Altitude and Race in Southern Cities, Geogr. Rev., 96, 50–78, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2006.tb00387.x, 2006. a
UNDP: Human Development Report 2010: The Real Wealth of Nations – Pathways to Human Development, Tech. rep., UNDP, New York, https://doi.org/10.2307/2137795, 2010. a
Wahl, T., Jain, S., Bender, J., Meyers, S. D., and Luther, M. E.: Increasing
risk of compound flooding from storm surge and rainfall for major US cities,
Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 1093–1097, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2736, 2015. a, b, c
Wang, Y. and Marsooli, R.: Physical Instability of Individuals Exposed to
Storm-Induced Coastal Flooding: Vulnerability of New Yorkers During Hurricane
Sandy, Water Resour. Res., 57, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028616, 2021. a
Wing, O. E., Bates, P. D., Smith, A. M., Sampson, C. C., Johnson, K. A.,
Fargione, J., and Morefield, P.: Estimates of present and future flood risk
in the conterminous United States, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaac65, 2018. a, b, c
Wing, O. E., Pinter, N., Bates, P. D., and Kousky, C.: New insights into US flood vulnerability revealed from flood insurance big data, Nat. Commun., 11, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15264-2, 2020. a
Wu, Q. and Lane, C. R.: Delineation and Quantification of Wetland Depressions
in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, Wetlands, 36, 215–227,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0731-6, 2016. a
Wu, Q., Deng, C., and Chen, Z.: Automated delineation of karst sinkholes from
LiDAR-derived digital elevation models, Geomorphology, 266, 1–10,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.05.006, 2016. a
Zheng, X., D'Angelo, C., Maidment, D., and Passlacqua, P.: Application of a
large-scale terrain-analysis-based flood mapping system to Hurricane Harvey,
J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 58, 149–163, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12987, 2022. a
Short summary
There is rising concern in numerous fields regarding the inequitable distribution of human risk to floods. The co-occurrence of river and surface flooding is largely excluded from leading flood hazard mapping services, therefore underestimating hazards. Using high-resolution elevation data and a region-specific social vulnerability index, we developed a method to estimate flood impacts at the household level in near-real time.
There is rising concern in numerous fields regarding the inequitable distribution of human risk...
