Articles | Volume 26, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1507-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1507-2022
Research article
 | 
18 Mar 2022
Research article |  | 18 Mar 2022

Theoretical and empirical evidence against the Budyko catchment trajectory conjecture

Nathan G. F. Reaver, David A. Kaplan, Harald Klammler, and James W. Jawitz

Viewed

Total article views: 5,011 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,324 1,617 70 5,011 315 63 77
  • HTML: 3,324
  • PDF: 1,617
  • XML: 70
  • Total: 5,011
  • Supplement: 315
  • BibTeX: 63
  • EndNote: 77
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Nov 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Nov 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,011 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,709 with geography defined and 302 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Jan 2025
Download
Short summary
The Budyko curve emerges globally from the behavior of multiple catchments. Single-parameter Budyko equations extrapolate the curve concept to individual catchments, interpreting curves and parameters as representing climatic and biophysical impacts on water availability, respectively. We tested these two key components theoretically and empirically, finding that catchments are not required to follow Budyko curves and usually do not, implying the parametric framework lacks predictive ability.