Articles | Volume 25, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6381-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6381-2021
Research article
 | 
16 Dec 2021
Research article |  | 16 Dec 2021

Evaluation of Asian summer precipitation in different configurations of a high-resolution general circulation model in a range of decision-relevant spatial scales

Mark R. Muetzelfeldt, Reinhard Schiemann, Andrew G. Turner, Nicholas P. Klingaman, Pier Luigi Vidale, and Malcolm J. Roberts

Viewed

Total article views: 2,942 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,861 1,012 69 2,942 244 57 49
  • HTML: 1,861
  • PDF: 1,012
  • XML: 69
  • Total: 2,942
  • Supplement: 244
  • BibTeX: 57
  • EndNote: 49
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Feb 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Feb 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,942 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,711 with geography defined and 231 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Simulating East Asian Summer Monsoon (EASM) rainfall poses many challenges because of its multi-scale nature. We evaluate three setups of a 14 km global climate model against observations to see if they improve simulated rainfall. We do this over catchment basins of different sizes to estimate how model performance depends on spatial scale. Using explicit convection improves rainfall diurnal cycle, yet more model tuning is needed to improve mean and intensity biases in simulated summer rainfall.