Dear Authors
the reviewers have recommended either major revision or rejection.
Their comments point out one major concern about the main objective of the paper which seems to them more an engineering case study application than an innovative research study.
According to this I propose to you to resubmit your paper as a new submission, after you have taken into consideration all the remarks of the two reviewers.

Dear Authors
The revised version you proposed includes a lot of chanes to take into account the recommandations of both reviewers.
The review requests are quite important, but your answers are highly relevant and described with much detail.
The reasons that gave the Rev 1 to reject the paper, despite he found it was a good and useful study, are discussed in details and the whole paper is modified to take them into account. I find your answers and modifications very relevant, and I recommend moderate revisions. It is important that both reviewers review this revised version and give their advice on the revision.