Articles | Volume 25, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-401-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-401-2021
Research article
 | 
27 Jan 2021
Research article |  | 27 Jan 2021

A comparison of catchment travel times and storage deduced from deuterium and tritium tracers using StorAge Selection functions

Nicolas Björn Rodriguez, Laurent Pfister, Erwin Zehe, and Julian Klaus

Viewed

Total article views: 4,320 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,169 1,080 71 4,320 158 89 101
  • HTML: 3,169
  • PDF: 1,080
  • XML: 71
  • Total: 4,320
  • Supplement: 158
  • BibTeX: 89
  • EndNote: 101
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Oct 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Oct 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,320 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,941 with geography defined and 379 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Different parts of water have often been used as tracers to determine the age of water in streams. The stable tracers, such as deuterium, are thought to be unable to reveal old water compared to the radioactive tracer called tritium. We used both tracers, measured in precipitation and in a stream in Luxembourg, to show that this is not necessarily true. It is, in fact, advantageous to use the two tracers together, and we recommend systematically using tritium in future studies.