Articles | Volume 24, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5699-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5699-2020
Research article
 | 
29 Nov 2020
Research article |  | 29 Nov 2020

Comparison of published palaeoclimate records suitable for reconstructing annual to sub-decadal hydroclimatic variability in eastern Australia: implications for water resource management and planning

Anna L. Flack, Anthony S. Kiem, Tessa R. Vance, Carly R. Tozer, and Jason L. Roberts

Viewed

Total article views: 2,167 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,416 681 70 2,167 255 70 73
  • HTML: 1,416
  • PDF: 681
  • XML: 70
  • Total: 2,167
  • Supplement: 255
  • BibTeX: 70
  • EndNote: 73
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Jun 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Jun 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,167 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,954 with geography defined and 213 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 04 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Palaeoclimate information was analysed for eastern Australia to determine when (and where) there was agreement about the timing of wet and dry epochs in the pre-instrumental period (1000–1899). The results show that instrumental records (~1900–present) underestimate the full range of rainfall variability that has occurred. When coupled with projected impacts of climate change and growing demands, these results highlight major challenges for water resource management and infrastructure.