While all of the Reviewers who served on the process are generally positive, some major critical points, including the need for a comprehensive inclusion of uncertainty-related issues, have emerged. These, together with the replies proposed by the Authors suggest that the manuscript requires a set of major revisions prior to being considered again. It is not my intention to disregard any of the points raised by the Reviewers and it should be clear that there is no guarantee that the manuscript be accepted unless all of the Reviewers are unambiguously satisfied.

Given the work performed by the Authors during the revisions phase and the feedback of the reviewers who served, I see no reason to delay acceptance. I would only suggest a thorough reading of the text to check for minor typos, as suggested by one of the reviewers.