Articles | Volume 23, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5033-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5033-2019
Research article
 | 
13 Dec 2019
Research article |  | 13 Dec 2019

Ability of a soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer model and a two-source energy balance model to predict evapotranspiration for several crops and climate conditions

Guillaume Bigeard, Benoit Coudert, Jonas Chirouze, Salah Er-Raki, Gilles Boulet, Eric Ceschia, and Lionel Jarlan

Viewed

Total article views: 3,923 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,639 1,217 67 3,923 68 65
  • HTML: 2,639
  • PDF: 1,217
  • XML: 67
  • Total: 3,923
  • BibTeX: 68
  • EndNote: 65
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Sep 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Sep 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,923 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,493 with geography defined and 430 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The purpose of our work is to estimate landscape evapotranspiration (ET) fluxes over agricultural areas by relying on two surface modeling approaches with increasing complexity and input data needs. Both approaches, compared sequentially and over the entire crop cycle, showed quite similar performance except under developed vegetation and stressed conditions. This study helps lay the groundwork for exploring the complementarities between instantaneous and continuous ET mapping with TIR data.