Articles | Volume 23, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 25 Oct 2019)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 01 Jul 2019)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
![Printer-friendly Version](https://www.hydrology-and-earth-system-sciences.net/print.gif)
![Supplement](https://www.hydrology-and-earth-system-sciences.net/supplement.gif)
-
SC1: 'Equating the NSE and KGE scores', John Ding, 11 Jul 2019
-
AC1: 'Reply to John Ding', Wouter Knoben, 06 Aug 2019
-
AC1: 'Reply to John Ding', Wouter Knoben, 06 Aug 2019
-
RC1: 'Review by HV Gupta', Hoshin Gupta, 23 Jul 2019
-
AC3: 'Reply to review by HV Gupta', Wouter Knoben, 07 Aug 2019
-
AC3: 'Reply to review by HV Gupta', Wouter Knoben, 07 Aug 2019
-
RC2: 'comment on technical note by Knoben et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 04 Aug 2019
-
AC2: 'Reply to review', Wouter Knoben, 07 Aug 2019
-
AC2: 'Reply to review', Wouter Knoben, 07 Aug 2019
Peer-review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (29 Aug 2019) by Nunzio Romano
![](https://www.hydrology-and-earth-system-sciences.net/graphic_grey_open_symbol_running_text.jpg)
AR by Wouter Knoben on behalf of the Authors (06 Sep 2019) 
Author's response
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (22 Sep 2019) by Nunzio Romano
![](https://www.hydrology-and-earth-system-sciences.net/graphic_grey_open_symbol_running_text.jpg)