Dear Dr Venhuizen,

After reading your manuscript I share the generally very positive attitude of the reviewers. Yet I think the paper needs to be revised to clarify open questions and to optimize the presentation for the reader. In this respect I follow most of the recommendations of reviewer 1 – particular the question about the group who selected the pictures and terms for the study is interesting, including the potential bias arising from this choice.

I think that also reviewer 2 made a point with respect to the citation of the literature from technical communication, and the annotations of your manuscript seem valuable as well.

I think all these points may be addressed within a round of moderate revisions.

Looking forward to read the revised version of your work,

Erwin Zehe

Dear Dr. Venhuizen,

I am delighted to tell you that your paper has been recommended for publication. Reviewer 2 suggested a few minor modification in the annotated manuscript, which I guess are straightforwardly implemented.

Look forward to receive the final paper.

Best regards,

Erwin Zehe

Dear Mrs. Venhuizen,

I delighted to accept your manuscript for final publication in HESS.

Best regards,

Erwin Zehe