The two reviewers provided a positive feedback about this manuscript, but both also pointed the need to make major revisions. The authors should improve the English, references and structure. Some clarifications are also needed as detailed in the review reports. The discussion should include more on how is the proposed approach compared to other standard approaches and limitation of the study. Also conclusions, considering the research questions, and recommendations are needed. The authors are asked to address all comments made by the two reviewers and submit the revised version with point-by-point answers to each of the comments.

Please see reviewer #1 comments recommending adding a discussion paragraph to putting the proposed methodology in a broader context.

The paper is acceptable for publication