Articles | Volume 23, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1035-2019
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1035-2019
Opinion article
 | 
20 Feb 2019
Opinion article |  | 20 Feb 2019

HESS Opinions: Socio-economic and ecological trade-offs of flood management – benefits of a transdisciplinary approach

Karl Auerswald, Peter Moyle, Simon Paul Seibert, and Juergen Geist

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (18 Jan 2019) by Erwin Zehe
AR by Juergen Geist on behalf of the Authors (18 Jan 2019)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (28 Jan 2019) by Erwin Zehe
AR by Juergen Geist on behalf of the Authors (31 Jan 2019)
Download
Short summary
The demand for flood protection often results in the construction of more and bigger levees along rivers. We highlight that such technical solutions often result in undesired socio-economic and ecological consequences such as increased downstream flooding risk, changes of groundwater levels, and a loss of aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity. We propose a transdisciplinary approach of integrated flood management and green infrastructure instead of reliance on technical protection measures.
Special issue