Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
HESS
Articles | Volume 22, issue 11
Articles | Volume 22, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5657-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5657-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 22, issue 11
Research article
 | 
01 Nov 2018
Research article |  | 01 Nov 2018

Challenges to implementing bottom-up flood risk decision analysis frameworks: how strong are social networks of flooding professionals?

James O. Knighton, Osamu Tsuda, Rebecca Elliott, and M. Todd Walter

Viewed

Total article views: 4,453 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,215 1,137 101 4,453 236 113 137
  • HTML: 3,215
  • PDF: 1,137
  • XML: 101
  • Total: 4,453
  • Supplement: 236
  • BibTeX: 113
  • EndNote: 137
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jul 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jul 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,453 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,192 with geography defined and 261 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 05 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
Decision-making for flood risk management is often the collective effort of professionals within government, NGOs, private practice, and advocacy groups. Our research investigates differences among flood experts within Tompkins County, New York (USA). We explore how they differ in their perceptions of flooding risk, desired project outcomes, and knowledge. We observe substantial differences among experts, and recommend formally acknowledging these perceptions when engaging in flood management.
Read more
Share