Articles | Volume 22, issue 11
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5657–5673, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5657-2018
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5657–5673, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5657-2018

Research article 01 Nov 2018

Research article | 01 Nov 2018

Challenges to implementing bottom-up flood risk decision analysis frameworks: how strong are social networks of flooding professionals?

James O. Knighton et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,969 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,400 547 22 1,969 95 23 19
  • HTML: 1,400
  • PDF: 547
  • XML: 22
  • Total: 1,969
  • Supplement: 95
  • BibTeX: 23
  • EndNote: 19
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jul 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jul 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,819 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,803 with geography defined and 16 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 20 Apr 2021
Download
Short summary
Decision-making for flood risk management is often the collective effort of professionals within government, NGOs, private practice, and advocacy groups. Our research investigates differences among flood experts within Tompkins County, New York (USA). We explore how they differ in their perceptions of flooding risk, desired project outcomes, and knowledge. We observe substantial differences among experts, and recommend formally acknowledging these perceptions when engaging in flood management.