Articles | Volume 22, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4867-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4867-2018
Research article
 | 
18 Sep 2018
Research article |  | 18 Sep 2018

Cross-validation of bias-corrected climate simulations is misleading

Douglas Maraun and Martin Widmann

Viewed

Total article views: 3,967 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,784 1,087 96 3,967 92 103
  • HTML: 2,784
  • PDF: 1,087
  • XML: 96
  • Total: 3,967
  • BibTeX: 92
  • EndNote: 103
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Apr 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Apr 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,967 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,804 with geography defined and 163 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Cross-validation of free-running bias-corrected climate change simulations against observations is misleading, because it is typically dominated by internal variability. In particular, a sensible bias correction may be rejected and a non-sensible bias correction may be accepted. We therefore propose to avoid cross-validation when evaluating bias correction of free-running bias-corrected climate change simulations. Instead, one should evaluate temporal, spatial and process-based aspects.