Articles | Volume 22, issue 5
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3053–3074, 2018

Special issue: Assessing impacts and adaptation to global change in water...

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3053–3074, 2018

Research article 30 May 2018

Research article | 30 May 2018

Integrated assessment of future potential global change scenarios and their hydrological impacts in coastal aquifers – a new tool to analyse management alternatives in the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer

Integrated assessment of future potential global change scenarios and their hydrological impacts in coastal aquifers – a new tool to analyse management alternatives in the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer
David Pulido-Velazquez1,2, Arianna Renau-Pruñonosa3, Carlos Llopis-Albert4, Ignacio Morell3, Antonio-Juan Collados-Lara1, Javier Senent-Aparicio2, and Leticia Baena-Ruiz1 David Pulido-Velazquez et al.
  • 1Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Granada, Spain
  • 2Universidad Católica de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • 3Jaume I University, Castellón, Spain
  • 4Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain

Correspondence: Antonio-Juan Collados-Lara (


Any change in the components of the water balance in a coastal aquifer, whether natural or anthropogenic, can alter the freshwater–salt water equilibrium. In this sense climate change (CC) and land use and land cover (LULC) change might significantly influence the availability of groundwater resources in the future. These coastal systems demand an integrated analysis of quantity and quality issues to obtain an appropriate assessment of hydrological impacts using density-dependent flow solutions. The aim of this work is to perform an integrated analysis of future potential global change (GC) scenarios and their hydrological impacts in a coastal aquifer, the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer. It is a Mediterranean aquifer that extends over 75 km2 in which important historical LULC changes have been produced and are planned for the future. Future CC scenarios will be defined by using an equi-feasible and non-feasible ensemble of projections based on the results of a multi-criteria analysis of the series generated from several regional climatic models with different downscaling approaches. The hydrological impacts of these CC scenarios combined with future LULC scenarios will be assessed with a chain of models defined by a sequential coupling of rainfall-recharge models, crop irrigation requirements and irrigation return models (for the aquifer and its neighbours that feed it), and a density-dependent aquifer approach. This chain of models, calibrated using the available historical data, allow testing of the conceptual approximation of the aquifer behaviour. They are also fed with series representatives of potential global change scenarios in order to perform a sensitivity analysis regarding future scenarios of rainfall recharge, lateral flows coming from the hydraulically connected neighbouring aquifer, agricultural recharge (taking into account expected future LULC changes) and sea level rise (SLR). The proposed analysis is valuable for improving our knowledge about the aquifer, and so comprises a tool to design sustainable adaptation management strategies taking into account the uncertainty in future GC conditions and their impacts. The results show that GC scenarios produce significant increases in the variability of flow budget components and in the salinity.

1 Introduction

Certain coastal regions simultaneously suffer scarce surface water resources and significant water demand. As a result, the reliability of supplying the demand depends on groundwater resources, which therefore play an important role in the management of these systems (Sola et al., 2013; Renau-Pruñonosa et al., 2016). The analysis of coastal aquifer management problems is an important and complex issue in which water quantity and quality have to be considered together to predict the salinization process, which depend on aquifer stratigraphy and other hydrodynamic factors (precipitation regime, tides, wave set-up and storm surges, etc.) (Vallejos et al., 2015). Due to the interaction between freshwater and seawater, coastal aquifers have important hydrodynamic and hydrogeochemical peculiarities (Custodio, 2010). Any change in the components of the water balance can modify the freshwater–salt water equilibrium that defines the seawater intrusion processes (Yechieli and Sivan, 2011; Arslan and Demir, 2013). In the future, the difficulty of meeting demand in coastal systems will increase due to the impact of GC, which will reduce freshwater recharge, raise sea level and increase irrigation demand (Fujinawa, 2011; Unsal et al., 2014). Therefore, GC impacts will challenge the current water supply management of coastal aquifers (Rasmussen et al., 2013).

In recent years the number of studies of CC impacts focusing on aquifers has grown quickly (Green et al., 2011; Molina et al., 2013). A few of these studies consider quality impacts, though groundwater quality can be affected by GC in many different ways (Pulido-Velazquez et al., 2014; Dragoni and Sukhija, 2008). Only some of them are focused on the impacts of GC on coastal aquifers (Yechieli et al., 2010). Though coastal aquifers warrant greater attention since they are more vulnerable to GC (due to their connection with the sea and the interaction between freshwater and seawater), they have not been extensively studied (Rasmussen et al., 2013). To assess the salinization process and possible adaptation strategies properly, coastal aquifers require that water quantity and quality issues are analysed in an integrated way.

In order to analyse the potential impacts of future scenarios of CC on any hydrological system, we need to generate time series of climate variables and to use them as inputs of previously calibrated hydrological models with them.

In coastal aquifers there is another important issue that needs to be considered when analysing CC impacts, namely any change in sea level (Ketabchi et al., 2016). A number of authors have studied the impacts of SLR in various coastal aquifers. Chang et al. (2011) showed that in a synthetic confined coastal aquifer in which recharge is steady there is no long-term impact on seawater intrusion. Werner and Simmons (2009) showed that in unconfined aquifers the influence of the inland boundary condition can be significant to its sensitivity to SLR. Rasmussen et al. (2013) analysed an inland coastal aquifer and found that minor SLRs did not seem to affect seawater intrusion as much. There are also reports by the IPCC (Church et al., 2013) and the European Environment Agency (EEA, 2014), which focus on the analysis of historical and potential future SLR scenarios.

In addition, urban and agricultural development forces appropriate management rules to be applied if groundwater resources under different LULC scenarios are to be exploited sustainably (Robins et al., 1999; Grundmann et al., 2012). A certain degree of overpumping usually occurs in Mediterranean coastal aquifers, particularly in summer, which encourages salinization processes (Rosenthal et al., 1992). This could be exacerbated by the future LULC scenarios.

Few studies have been published that analyse GC in an integrated way – along with its impacts on future LULC change scenarios – to produce an overall analysis of GC (e.g. Pulido-Velazquez et al., 2014; Guo et al., 2015); some address cases of coastal aquifers (Benini et al., 2016; Gorelick and Zheng, 2015).

From a methodological point of view, the study of the impacts of potential GC on groundwater using an integrated and holistic climatic–agronomical–hydrological model that includes water quantity and quality continues to be a big challenge. From an operational point of view, research aimed at solving these problems has focussed on sequential coupling of models. The assessment of these impacts requires models that can predict the evolution of the freshwater–salt water interface. In order to obtain an accurate representation of the physical process involved in seawater intrusion, flow and transport need to be coupled and solved simultaneously for each time step. Such an approach gives density-dependent solutions (e.g. Shammas and Thunvik, 2009; Doulgeris and Zissis, 2014) that take the salinization process into account. Simplified sharp interface models would provide a less accurate approach with a lower number of parameters and fewer computational requirements (e.g. Llopis-Albert and Pulido-Velazquez, 2014, 2015).

The objective of this work is to perform an integrated analysis of future potential GC scenarios (including CC, LULC change and SLR) and their hydrological impacts in a coastal aquifer, the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer. We simultaneously consider water quantity and quality in order to approach the salinization process. Section 2 describes the aquifer and the available data, while Sect. 3 presents the methodology. We propose a method to analyse and generate potential future GC scenarios involving different sources of uncertainty (Sect. 3.1). A modelling framework is defined to assess hydrological impacts on the coastal aquifer based on a sequential coupling of rainfall-recharge models, crop irrigation requirements and irrigation-return models, and a density-dependent solution that couples the resolution of flow and transport calculations for each time step (Sect. 3.2). Section 4 presents the results and their discussion. It includes an analysis of the sensitivity to potential future changes in rainfall recharge, LULC and sea level. We consider the limitations of this study and propose future research. Lastly, Sect. 5 presents the main conclusions of this research.

Figure 1Location map area and cross sections of the study.


2 Materials: description of the aquifer and the data available

2.1 Location and hydrogeology

The Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca is a shallow heterogeneous detrital aquifer that extends over approximately 75 km2. It is oriented NE–SW, parallel to the Mediterranean coast along 21 km, its inland dimension being in a range between 2.5 and 6 km. The ground surface over the aquifer comprises a gentle relief, steepening towards the surrounding limestone massifs (Fig. 1).

Geographically, the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer borders the Sierra de Irta to the north (Cretaceous-Jurassic limestone), which is in hydraulic connection with the Plana. To its south lie the Oropesa Mountains (Cretaceous limestone). The western border (southern Maestrazgo) is formed by the Aptian and Gargasian limestone massif, which is in hydraulic connection with the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer (except in the immediate vicinity of the Chinchilla and Estopet rivers where the impermeable Miocene base appears; Morell and Giménez, 1997; Renau-Pruñonosa et al., 2016).

Figure 2Land use change (comparing the CORINE Land Cover databases for 1990 and 2006) over the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca and Maestrazgo aquifers.


The Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca is composed of Plioquaternary detrital materials comprising limestone pebbles, gravel and conglomerates derived from the adjacent mountain ranges, with abundant lenses of coarse sand, silt and clays. There are frequent lateral and vertical changes in facies and the overall distribution is irregular. The aquifer is overlain by more recent alluvial fans, colluviums, dunes and peatlands. Its geometry is lenticular – it is thinnest in the interior and thickest near the coast, exceeding 80 m at the mouths of the Estopet and Chinchilla rivers. Several studies have demonstrated how the transmissivity of the aquifer varies over a wide range: from 5000 to 100 m2 day−1; the calculated effective porosity varies from 1 to 13 %, with the highest porosity nearest to the coastline. Inflows to the system consist of lateral groundwater transfers coming from adjacent aquifers, infiltration from precipitation and irrigation returns. Outflows comprise the pumped abstractions, together with groundwater discharges to the sea and seeps/springs in the Prat de Cabanes wetland. Under natural conditions, groundwater flows NW–SE, perpendicular to the coastline (Morell and Giménez, 1997; Renau-Pruñonosa et al., 2016).

The carbonate basement receives the contributions coming from the bordering aquifer (Maestrazgo aquifer) and feeds the detrital aquifer. The direction of the groundwater flow is from the carbonate basement to the detrital aquifer.

The Prat de Cabanes is a wetland located in the centre of the Plana. It extends approximately 9 km2, parallel to the coastline with an elongated shape. It is separated from the sea by a coastal bar some 8 km long, 20 m wide and 3 m high, consisting of sorted pebbles. It is composed of brown and black silt and loam, with a recognized peat level some 3 to 4 m thick, which is commercially exploited.

2.2 Historical LULC changes and climatic–hydrological data

In the 1960s and early 1970s the Oropesa-Torreblanca Plain was sparsely populated and land was dedicated mostly to non-irrigated cropping. From 1975 to 1995 there was a significant transformation from dry to irrigated lands, especially in the period 1985–1995. From 1995 to 2010, marked changes occurred in LULC, with a generalized overhaul of the irrigation systems used and a conversion from agricultural to residential LULC, particularly along the coastal belt (Oropesa del Mar, Amplaries and Torre la Sal).

Figure 3Historical rainfall and temperature in the Plana de Oropesa-Torreblanca and Maestrazgo aquifers.


The following historical data for the period 1973–2010 were used to define the inputs of the coupled modelling framework described in Sect. 3.

  1. Changes in LULC (Fig. 2), obtained from both fieldwork undertaken in the area and from the European CORINE Land Cover database (Feranec et al., 2010). These data were used to estimate the irrigation returns, following the procedure described in Sect. 3.2.2.

    A comparison of the land cover maps for 1990 and 2006 shows that the main change in LULC classes was an increase (+227 %; from 182 ha in 1996 to 592 ha in 2006) in artificial surfaces (transport infrastructure, urban sprawl, tourism and recreation facilities), mainly at the expense of agricultural areas (5.5 %; from 7420 ha in 1996 to 7015 ha in 2006). According to the Júcar River Basin Management Plan (CHJ, 2015), the percentage LULC for major crops is citrus fruits 72.4 %, vines 12.9 %, outdoor vegetables 7.9 % and others 6.8 %. As for irrigation techniques, drip irrigation supplies 65.5 % of the total irrigated area, flood irrigation provides 34 % and spray irrigation provides 0.5 %, with an overall irrigation efficiency of 60.1 %.

  2. Historical rainfall and temperature (T) for the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca and Maestrazgo aquifers (see Fig. 3) were taken from the Spain02 project dataset (Herrera et al., 2016). They were used to estimate rainfall recharge (see Sect. 3.2.2).

  3. Historical evolution of total pumping in the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer was deduced from historical data.

    The transformation from dry to irrigated croplands led to an increase in pumped abstractions that extended over 2 decades (1975–1995, especially in the period 1985–1995), provoking a drop in groundwater level and seawater intrusion problems. From 1995 to 2010 there was a progressive reduction in pumping due to the abandonment of certain crops and irrigated areas.

A graphical representation of these series is included in Sect. 3.2.3 (density-dependent flow model).

Figure 4Flowchart of the modelling framework.


Other hydrological information used to calibrate the models is the following.

  1. An infiltration rate coefficient of 14 % for the historical period, which was obtained from previous lysimiter readings from a neighbouring aquifer with similar characteristic (Plana de Castellón; Tuñon, 2000). It has been used to generate historical series of rainfall recharge by applying an infiltration coefficient directly to rainfall data, which is a simple approximation commonly applied (Kirn et al., 2017). The mean historical recharge (85 mm yr−1) obtained from this infiltration rate coefficient is quite similar to the mean (89 mm yr−1) estimated by other authors who applied an atmospheric chloride mass balance (Alcalá and Custodio, 2014).

  2. Irrigation return coefficients for the crops in the area were taken from a previous study performed by Tuñon (2000). They have been used to assess return from irrigation demands.

  3. Hydraulic heads and salinity in different observation wells.

The available observation network (21 points for hydraulic head and 31 points for salinity) yielded good distributed information on aquifer state from both the quantitative and qualitative points of view. The location of the observation wells and the evolution of the variables at some of these points are described in Sect. 3.2.3 (density-dependent flow model). We have used the information available for the period 1973–2010.

3 Method – application to the case study

The flowchart of the method has been represented in Fig. 4. It summaries the steps that we propose to follow in order to perform an integrated assessment of potential GC scenarios. First of all, we propose and approach to generate future potential GC scenarios (Sect. 3.1) considering, LULC, CC and SLR. Then, a modelling framework (Sect. 3.2) was defined to assess hydrological impacts on the coastal aquifer based on a density-dependent simulation whose inputs are defined by sequential coupling of different models. Finally, it is used to propagate the generated potential future GC scenarios (Sect. 3.3).

3.1 Generation of future GC scenarios

They have been defined by combining the future LULC scenario approved in the General Town Plans in the area and the generated CC and SLR scenarios.

3.1.1 Future LULC change scenarios

The predicted future changes in LULC over the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca are of greater magnitude than the historical ones and could drastically modify the rural and urban landscape. The already-approved tourist developments (the public urbanization work – PAI – for the Marina d'Or Golf in Oropesa and Cabanes, and the General Town Plan – PGOU – for Torreblanca) anticipate an increase in population of more than 130 000 inhabitants, as well as the disappearance of most of the agricultural activity in the area. These significant changes in LULC will produce significant impacts on water demands, and, therefore in pumping and recharge and so to the hydrodynamics of the aquifer. In contrast, there are no significant changes to LULC anticipated in the area belonging to the municipality of Alcalà de Xivert, also situated on the Plana.

The General Town Plan for Torreblanca (PGOU Torreblanca, 2009) approves the conversion of 70 % of the municipality's area included in the General Town Plan, which is currently used for citrus agriculture, into land classified as buildable residential or industrial. Even along the coast, to the north of Prat de Cabanes, is the projected urbanization – included in the so-called Integrated Activity Plan (PAI) – of Doña Blanca Golf (Fig. 5).

The municipalities of Cabanes and Oropesa in the southern inland part of the Plana de Oropesa-Torreblanca have approved PAIs for the Marina d'Or Golf, which will include three golf courses, private residential developments, hotel complexes and associated garden areas. Once all these planned constructions are completed, they will cover some 16 km2 (Fig. 5). Two of the conditions that the Valencian Government imposed before it approved the PAI Marina D'Or Golf are that the whole of the area that requires irrigation (both golf course and garden areas) must use recycled residential water from the wastewater treatment works; and that all water destined for urban supply must be sourced from a desalination plant. Thus, as the various individual projects are built, the groundwater abstractions in the area are falling, until they will cease completely at the end of the PAI development period. Over the neighbouring Maestrazgo aquifer, we will assume that there are no changes in LULC.

Table 1RCMs and GCMs considered.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

Figure 5Future land use scenarios in 2035.


3.1.2 Generation of potential future climate scenarios for the system

We propose a method to generate consistent potential future climate scenarios for a short-term horizon (2011–2035) from the historical (1973–2010) data (see Sect. 2.2) and the climate model simulations performed in the framework of the EU CORDEX project (2013). It requires an analysis of the results obtained by applying different downscaling techniques. A multi-criteria analysis of some statistics of these series was performed to identify the best simulations of the historical data. Different ensemble hypotheses have been adopted to define more representative potential future climate scenarios to be employed in the groundwater impact study. Our main target is to provide an estimate of the most representative plausible future climate scenarios. For this reason we propose generating and propagating four plausible representative climate scenarios defined by an ensemble of different climate models, which provide a better approach of future climate scenarios than taking directly a scenario defined by a single model. The “ensembles” coalesce and consolidate the results of individual climate projections, thus allowing for more robust climate projections that are more representative than those based on a single model (Spanish Meteorological Agency, AEMET, 2009). In this paper we do not intend to perform a detailed analysis of hydrological uncertainty. In this case, in order to assess the uncertainty on hydrological impacts it would be more appropriate to obtain results from each individual climate model.

Climate model simulation data – control and future scenarios

In this work we have focused on the information available for the most pessimistic emission scenario (RCP8.5). We analyse the information coming from the EU CORDEX project (2013), where we find nine climate-change scenarios (see Table 1) defined with the simulations (control and future series) obtained with five regional climate models (CCLM4-8-17, RCA4, HIRHAM5, RACMO22E and WRF331F) nested with some GCMs (four GCMs were available).

We have obtained representative lumped series of these simulations for our system, by weighting the values in each CORDEX cell according to its surface in the domain. Figure 6 shows a significant bias between the historical data and the control simulation that will force us to apply a correction technique to generate future scenarios.

We also observe important differences between the statistics of future (2011–2035) and control (1976–2000) series (rainfall and T) for each RCM (Fig. 7).

Figure 6Monthly mean and standard deviation of the historical and RCMs control series (rainfall and temperature) for the mean year in the period 1976–2000. RCMs data obtained from CORDEX project.


Figure 7Relative monthly change in mean and standard deviation of the future series (2011–2035) with respect to the control series (1976–2000) for the considered RCMs under the RCP8.5 emission scenario.


Application of different downscaling techniques (bias correction and delta change techniques)

In accordance with the hypotheses assumed to define future climate series in a water resource system (starting from the climate model simulations) we can consider two different kinds of downscaling techniques: bias correction techniques and delta change techniques (Räisänen and Räty, 2012). In the present study we apply both conceptual approaches (bias correction and delta change techniques).

The bias correction techniques are based on the analysis of the statistical difference between the climatic variables in the historical data and the control simulations produced by the climate models for the same period. They aim to define a transformation function to correct the control series to obtain a better approximation of the historical statistic. They assume that in the future the bias between model and data will be the same as observed in the historical period (e.g. Watanabe et al., 2012; Haerter et al., 2011). The delta change approaches assume that the model can obtain a good approximation of the relative changes in climate variables' statistics, but do not provide a good prediction of the absolute values. Accordingly, they try to characterize the “delta change” produced in the main statistics of the climatic variables by analysing the relative difference between the future and control scenario simulations. The future series will be obtained by perturbation of the historical series in accordance with the estimated “delta change” (e.g. Pulido-Velazquez et al., 2011a, 2014; Räisänen and Räty, 2012).

Figure 8Mean, standard deviation and asymmetry coefficients of future precipitation series (A) and future temperature series (B) for the average year for the RCM RCA4 model linked to the CNRM-CM5 GCM.


When applying both correction techniques (bias and delta change) the spatial resolution of the historical data available for our systems is usually more detailed than those adopted by the climate model and, therefore, these transformations indirectly produce solutions with higher spatial resolution than the RCM one. Therefore, they are commonly known as downscaling transformations. We have applied two downscaling techniques (correction of first and second order moments) for both conceptual approaches (bias correction and delta change techniques). The correction of the first and second moments for the delta change approach was defined at monthly scale as described in Pulido-Velazquez et al. (2014). The bias correction case was also defined in an analogous way. The difference is that the perturbation is defined by modifying the statistics (first and second moments) of the control series to approximate the historical ones. It will be applied assuming to correct the future assuming that will be invariant. As example, the first, second and third moments of the series obtained with both approaches for one of the RCM (RCA4 linked to CNRM-CM5) are represented in Fig. 8.

Multi-criteria analysis of the main statistic

Two multi-objective analyses are proposed: one related to the bias approaches and another to the delta ones.

In the delta change approaches we applied the multi-criteria analysis proposed by Pulido-Velazquez et al. (2014). It intends to identify the models that provided the best approximations to the main historical statistics (mean, standard deviation and asymmetry coefficients) based on the analysis of their control simulation of the historical period. The dominated solution or “inferior” models approaching the historical statistic were identified and eliminated. A model is eliminated (see Table 2) if any other model's prediction provides better approximation to the cited statistics.

Table 2Eliminated and non-eliminated models in the multiple-criteria analysis.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

In this study we also propose a multiple-criteria analysis for the bias correction approaches. This allows us to identify the best combination of model and bias correction techniques (see Table 3) to approximate the main statistics of the historical series. Since most of the combinations of model and bias correction techniques provide very good approximations to the first moment, a relative error threshold was defined to consider a corrected control to approach better a statistic when significant differences (higher than the threshold) are obtained.

Figure 9Monthly mean and standard deviation of future precipitation and temperature series obtained by the four ensemble options.


Table 3Eliminated and non-eliminated combinations of model and bias-correction techniques.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

Ensembles of predictions to define more representative future climate scenarios

We considered four options to define representative future scenarios by applying different ensembles of corrected projections. Two ensemble scenarios (Ei) were generated by a linear combination of all the future series generated by delta change (E1) or bias correction (E2). Two other options were defined by combining only the non-eliminated models (E3, for the delta change approach) or combinations of models and correction techniques (E4, for the bias correction techniques). They do not consider the eliminated options because they provide inferior approximations to the historical series that make us mistrust their predictions.

All ensemble predictions show a very similar increase in mean T (see Fig. 9). The standard deviation estimated with the delta change approaches is quite similar to the historical one, but both ensembles defined by applying bias correction show smaller standard deviations.

A reduction in future mean rainfall is predicted by all the ensembles for every month except September and October, when relative increases in rainfall are predicted. Since these are the months with the highest historical rainfall, the overall effect is a higher total annual rainfall compared to the historical. During September and October in this Mediterranean area we have important storms related to the phenomenon known as the “cold drop” (Roth, 2003). It is related to the higher total rainfall observed in these months. In accordance with the obtained potential scenarios, in the future we would have an increment in these extreme rainfall events.

As we also observed for the T, the standard deviation of the future rainfall predicted with the delta change approaches is quite similar to the historical one, but both ensembles defined by applying bias correction show significant reductions.

3.1.3 Sea level rise (SLR) scenarios

Based on the European Environment Agency analysis (EEA, 2014) of historical and potential future SLRs, we propose a SLR scenario to study the sensitivity of our GC simulations to a potential SLR. The EAA report states that, over the last 2 decades, satellite measurements have indicated a mean rate of SLR of more than 3.2 mm yr−1. If we assume that this rate remains constant, then, by the end of a future horizon of 25 years, we would have a rise in sea level of 0.08 m. On the other hand, model simulations for the RCP8.5 emission scenario show a rise in sea level for 2081–2100 in the range 0.45–0.81 m. If we assume a constant rate of SLR from now until 2100, the sea level would rise a maximum of 0.19 m (more than double the observed rate over the last 2 decades). This value (a rise of 0.19 m by the end of the future horizon) was used to define a very pessimistic scenario of maximum SLR. A linear SLR was considered during the future horizon (2011–2035).

3.2 Definition of a coupled modelling framework

In order to assess quantity and quality impacts on groundwater systems, we needed to calibrate a density-dependent model that simulates flow and transport within the porous aquifer medium. We propose a sequential coupling of three “auxiliary models” (rainfall-recharge models, crop irrigation requirements and irrigation return models) with this density-dependent model, in which the outputs of the auxiliary models are used as inputs of the groundwater model (see Fig. 4).

The models were calibrated with the available historical data (1981–2010). Historical data for the period 1973–1981 were used to validate them. These models were then used to simulate the impacts of future LULC and CC scenarios.

3.2.1 Rainfall-recharge models

Based on the historical climate (rainfall and T) and recharge series for the period 1973–2010 described in Sect. 2.2, we applied the simple empirical rainfall-recharge proposed by Pulido-Velazquez et al. (2017) to generate yearly aquifer recharge series. The model assumes that rainfall and T are the most important climatic variables determining potential aquifer recharge, and the variability of both of them will determine the impacts of future potential climatic scenarios on the recharge.

It intends to define a correction function for the perturbation of the historical series defined as the difference in rainfall and evapotranspiration (ETR) (difference hereafter referred to as PE series), modifying its mean and standard deviation to make them equal to the statistic of the historical aquifer recharge previously deduced from the lysimeter measurements (see Sect. 2.2). The calibrated function is employed to obtain the precipitation recharge series (PR) also for the future period. The steps required are the following (Pulido-Velazquez et al., 2017).

  1. Estimation of the change in the mean and standard deviation of PE and PR series for the historical period:

    (1) Δ μ = μ ( PR ) - μ ( PE ) μ ( PR ) and Δ σ = σ ( PR ) - σ ( PE ) σ ( PR )
  2. Standardization of the PE series (historical and future):

    (2) PEn i = PE i - PE σ PE
  3. Generation of PR series from PE series

    The future R series will be obtained from the future PR series assuming that the bias (Δμ and Δσ) remains invariant in the future.

    (3) PR i = σ c PEn i + μ c


    (4) μ c = μ ( PE ) ( 1 + Δ μ ) μ c and σ c = σ ( PE ) ( 1 + Δ σ )

Taking the positive relationship of T and E into account (Arora, 2002; Gerrits et al., 2009), changes in T will determine the available non-evaporative fraction of rainfall available for aquifer recharge. Different non-global empirical models could be applied to assess the historical E from T series (e.g. Turc, 1954, 1961; Coutagne, 1954; Budyko, 1974; amongst others) as described in Arora (2002), Gerrits et al. (2009), and España et al. (2013). In this study, we applied Turc's model (1954, 1961), in which the results depend on mean annual T and solar irradiation over the latitude.

In order to approach the impact of seasonal variability, the annual rainfall-recharge values obtained using the simplified model were distributed between the 12 months maintaining the pattern of the historical rainfall-recharge series. We assume that recharge from a rainfall event will reach the aquifer in less than 1 month, so working with stress periods of 1 month means there is no delay between the rainfall and the aquifer recharge.

Two simplified rainfall-recharge models were developed, one for the Plana de Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer and the other for the Maestrazgo aquifer.

The Maestrazgo aquifer recharge model is used to assess inflows to the carbonate basement that produces lateral inflows (LI) to the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer under various potential GC scenarios. The Maestrazgo aquifer has an important storage capacity which is almost in a natural regime and does not present significant changes in hydraulic head. The Maestrazgo rainfall-recharge model is employed to assess future recharge, the LI to the carbonate basement being obtained by assuming a constant ratio between Maestrazgo rainfall recharge and these LI.

3.2.2 Modelling crop irrigation demands and irrigation returns

The LULC information was used to estimate agricultural water requirements following a procedure to compute crop water requirements based on the FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper (Allen et al., 1998). This approximation was applied in previous CC impact research studies (e.g. Escriva-Bou et al., 2016). The irrigation values added to the rainfall constitute the total inflows coming from the surface system. A Turc (1954) model was employed to estimate the total ETR in the area considering not only rainfall, but also irrigation water. The difference between the total ETR and the ETR for the rainfall allows us to determine the ETR related to irrigation, taking into account the climate conditions (rainfall and T). The estimated irrigation demands have also been employed to assess pumping taking into account information about the origin of the water that supplies each demand. The irrigation demands are multiplied by the irrigation return coefficients obtained for the crops in this area in previous studies (Tuñon, 2000) to assess recharge from irrigation.

3.2.3 Density-dependent flow model (flow and transport)

Based on the hydrological description in Sect. 2.1, a conceptual model was defined to approach the aquifer as an unconfined heterogeneous detritic aquifer. The inflows to the aquifer include rainfall recharge, lateral groundwater inflows from the bordering aquifers (LGI) and irrigation returns. The outflows include natural springs that feed the wetland, pumping wells and outflows to the sea. The historical evolution of the inflows and outflows is represented in Fig. 10.

The SEAWAT 3-D finite-difference numerical code (Guo and Langevin, 2002) was used to solve the coupled partial differential equations for variable-density flow and transport. It combines MODFLOW (McDonald and Harbough, 1988) and MT3DMS (Zheng and Wang, 1999) into a single code that conserves fluid mass, rather than fluid volume, and uses the equivalent freshwater head as the primary dependent variable.

The domain has been divided into 32 columns and 90 rows in the horizontal plane, with a cell size of 250 m × 250 m. Therefore, the groundwater flow and transport domain extends over a size of 8000 m × 22 500 m. We adopted a vertical discretization consist of 11 layers in order to avoid a high computational cost (e.g. Sreekanth and Datta, 2010) while maintaining reasonable levels of numerical dispersion and representing complex flow patterns near areas of high concentration gradients (Guo and Langevin, 2002). These 11 layers, were defined as confined/unconfined layers where the transmissivity varies. On the one hand, for the flow boundary conditions a prescribed head of 0 m has been assigned to all cells belonging to the sea frontier of the model. For the transport boundary conditions a prescribed concentration of 35 g L−1 has been assigned to all cells belonging to the sea frontier of the model.

We assumed a density of freshwater of 1000 and 1025 kg m−3 for the seawater with 0.7143 as the slope of the linear equation of state that relates fluid density to solute concentration.

Figure 10Historical evolution of inflows and outflows in the aquifer.


The groundwater model covers the Plio-Quaternary and Pre-Quaternary formations. The spatial heterogeneity is tackled using the concept of multiple statistical populations (Llopis-Albert and Capilla, 2010), in which the rock matrix and each fracture are represented as independent statistical populations. The random function for each structure (i.e. the aquifer matrix and fractures) is modelled based on a geostatistical analysis conditional on its own statistical distribution (i.e. hydraulic conductivity data as well as geological information and expert judgment). The random function is supposed to be multi-Gaussian for the rock matrix, while the fractures are considered non-multi-Gaussian. In this way, the rock matrix is generated by sequential Gaussian simulation using the GCOSIM3D code (Gómez-Hernández and Srivastava, 1990), while the fractures are generated by sequential indicator simulation using the ISIM3D code (Gómez-Hernández and Journel, 1993). The latter code makes use of local conditional cumulative density functions (ccdfs) defined by conductivity measurements and the corresponding indicator variograms. Therefore, the spatial heterogeneity is modelled as an equivalent porous medium (e.g. Llopis-Albert and Capilla, 2010). On the one hand, the hydraulic conductivity data for fractures present high values, greater than 1000 m day−1. This allows the reproduction of strings of extreme values of hydraulic conductivity that often take place in nature and can be crucial in order to obtain realistic and safe estimations of mass transport predictions. That is, it allows reproduction of preferential flow channels in strongly heterogeneous aquifers or fractured formations. On the other hand, the hydraulic conductivity data for the aquifer matrix cover a wide range of values, i.e. from 5 to 200 m day−1. In addition, for each cell we have defined a vertical hydraulic conductivity equal to a tenth of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity. The position of fractures is deterministically incorporated into the model based on geological information and expert judgment, thus allowing us to classify the cell models. Those cells of the model intersected by a fracture are assigned conductivities according to the intersecting fracture, and those that are not are considered to be cells belonging to the rock matrix.

Figure 11(a) Hydraulic head obtained with the models vs. data at some observation points. (b) Salinity obtained with the models vs. data at some observation points.

The model was calibrated with the available historical data in the period (1981–2010), while the data in the period 1973–1981 were used to validate it. This was carried out by applying a trial and error procedure simultaneously considering quantity and quality. We have not used an inverse model (e.g. Llopis-Albert et al., 2016) because its computational cost would be important in order to deal with such a quantity of parameters (hydraulic conductivity, storativity, porosity, dispersion coefficients, etc.) and variables (hydraulic head and salinity) within a SEAWAT model over a long period of time (from 1973 to 2010), so that we have decided to apply a trial and error procedure.

The calibrated model parameters encompass different zones of horizontal hydraulic conductivities ranging from 5 to 200 m day−1, while the vertical hydraulic conductivities are between 0.5 and 20 m day−1. There are also different zones of specific storage values, which range from 10−5 to 5 × 10−4 1/m; specific yield, with values from 0.01 to 0.15; effective porosity values from 0.01 to 0.13; and dispersion coefficients from 50 to 100 m. We have replaced a highly heterogeneous porous medium with an upscaled “equivalent” homogeneous porous medium to represent the hydrogeological parameters since the cell size of the discretization is 250 m × 250 m (e.g. Llopis-Albert and Capilla, 2010). Then, we used a value of the effective porosity based on available data, which were subsequently calibrated and upscaled using expert judgment. The results of the calibration process prove the worth of this approach.

Reasonably good results in terms of goodness of fit to the historical hydraulic head and salinity were obtained, as shown in Fig. 11 for various head and salinity observation wells.

The root mean square value (rms) of the departures between observed and simulated values for both piezometric heads and salt concentrations is presented for the whole domain and temporal discretization due to the large number of boreholes (21 boreholes for piezometric heads and 31 for salinity). These values are ηh= 0.7 m and ηc= 391.8 mg L−1.

Note that this ηh= 0.7 m could seems to be a little high but we should take into account that we have observation wells where the historical hydraulic head measurement fluctuates sometimes more than 6 m during the same month (see for example observation well 6). Note that the high value for ηc= 391.8 mg L−1 could be also explained by the scale of the salt concentration, which range from 0 to 35 000 mg L−1, and the measurement fluctuations, which in some wells is even higher than 4000 mg L−1 during some months.

Finally, the calibrated model is used to propagate impacts of future LULC and CC scenarios.

3.3 Hydrological impacts: propagation of future climatic scenarios

Analysis of GC impacts will require a sequential simulation of the LULC change scenarios for the different climate scenarios (Ei) in the auxiliary models (rainfall-recharge models, the crop irrigation requirement and irrigation return models) in order to define the inputs for the groundwater density-dependent model.

In order to assess the potential impacts of the future LULC scenario (LULC scenario) and different GCs (CC and LULC change scenarios), we have simulated the following scenarios using the density-dependent flow model.

  1. Baseline (BL) scenario: no LULC change and no CC. We simulate a future scenario for horizon 2011–2035 assuming that from 2011 we would have the same LULC that we observed in 2010. We also assume that the hydrological characteristic does not change, and we have simulated assuming that the rainfall recharge and the LI from the neighbouring aquifer are equal to those estimated in the last 5 years of the historical periods (2006–2010). In this period of 5 years (2006–2010) there was no significant change in LULC, and so this period could be adopted as being representative of the mean recent climatic–hydrological conditions. This scenario was defined in order to compare against the others to analyse the sensitivity to GC.

  2. LULC scenario: it considers the described future LULC scenario and assumes that there is not CC.

  3. Global change scenarios (GCi) assuming constant sea level: we consider four GC scenarios that simultaneously consider the potential impacts of the described future LULC scenario under the four generated CC scenarios (Eisee Sect. The comparison of these scenarios with the BL provides information about the GC impacts.

  4. SLR scenarios: we have also simulated the four GC scenarios assuming that the sea level grows in a linear way to 0.19 m during the future horizon (2011–2035).

The results obtained are summarized and discussed in Sect. 4.

4 Results and discussion

The proposed approach has similarities to the one described by Pulido-Velazquez et al. (2015), in which an integrated analysis of GC is performed including CC and LULC changes. The most important differences are related to the fact that a coastal aquifer is studied and we consider quality issues simulating with a variable density flow and transport model. The model was calibrated with the historical data. The approach allows us to propagate impacts of different CC and LULC change scenarios in terms of global flow balance, as well as a distributed approximation of the hydraulic head and salinity.

The historical simulation in accordance with the data shows that, in most of the aquifer area (more than 80 %), the salinity is above the natural background of the aquifer (1100 mg L−1), and, therefore, it is in general affected by intrusion.

The GC scenarios have been analysed in terms of impacts on global flow balance components and salinity at specific points.

The four GC scenarios show higher variability in all the inflows and outflows in the aquifer (see GC1 in Fig. 12). If we focus on the components of the global balance, in global terms, this analysis does not show an increment in the intrusion, and it would even be slightly reduced with respect to the baseline scenario due to the outflows to the sea not decreasing (see Fig. 13). These results show a lower sensitivity to the LULC than to the GC scenarios in which the impacts also include climate change.

Figure 14 shows the evolution in terms of salinity at four specific observation points roughly equi-spaced. They were selected to cover the extension of the aquifer from north to south (starting with the more northerly one and moving towards the south, we have observation wells 33, 12, 39 and 21 respectively).

Figure 12Components of the flow budget evolution for the BL scenario and the GC1 scenario (horizon 2011–2035).


From the results in terms of salinity at specific observation points (Fig. 14), we can observe the heterogeneity of the impacts of the LULC scenario and CC scenarios. The area around observation point 33 is not affected by LULC changes and we only observe sensitivity to CC scenarios that produce a higher variability in the salinity evolution, but the mean trend of the concentration does not change. Around observation point 12, in the Torreblanca area, the LULC change scenario would produce a reduction in the recharge whose impacts can be observed as an increment in the salinity during the first decade of the future horizon. Nevertheless, in the last 10 years the reduction in pumping produced by the successive transformations of irrigated areas to residential land would reduce the salinity significantly. In this Torreblanca area CC scenarios would impact the salt concentration significantly during the first years due to the increment in pumping requirements produced by the higher water irrigation requirements obtained for these CC scenarios. Even considering the impacts of CC scenarios, during the last 10 years of the horizon it starts to recover due to the reduction in pumping produced by the new transformations of irrigated areas to residential land defined in the LULC scenario, the concentration at the end of the horizon (2035) even being under the values obtained for the BL scenario. In observation point 39, located further away from the coast, the reduction in pumping due to LULC change would reduce the salinity during most of the year of the horizon. Nevertheless, the reduction in recharge in some years makes the salinity get close to the one obtained without LULC changes (BL scenario), being very similar at the end of the period. Again, CC scenarios would increase the variability of the salinity in the simulated period.

We can also identify in the southern part areas where the situation will clearly improve throughout the future horizon contemplated with the proposed scenarios. For example, at observation point 21, in the Oropesa area, the salinity would be reduced with the contemplated scenarios, which would be mainly related to the reduction of pumping in this area due to the transformation of irrigated areas to residential land defined in the LULC scenario.

As mentioned above, the expected results considering GC impacts are likely to be too pessimistic or optimistic, depending on the location. These results can be useful for the authorities in charge of implementing management policies in the Plana Oropesa-Torrablanca. We can use this coupled modelling framework to assess potential effects of adaptation measures on GC by modifying the inputs of the models. Participatory processes including the relevant stakeholders might be essential in the definition of scenarios and successful adaptation measures (Pulido-Velazquez et al., 2015). This modelling framework could be useful in the search for consensus (“shared vision” models) between different stakeholders.

Figure 13Mean inflows and outflows for various global scenarios (GC1–GC4).


Figure 14Evolution of future salinity concentrations at four observation points for the baseline (BL) scenario and the four global change scenarios.


Lastly, we analysed the sensitivity of the GC scenarios to a SLR scenario (Fig. 15). A rise of 0.19 m at the end of the future horizon was used to define a very pessimistic scenario of maximum SLR (see Sect. 3.1.3). A linear SLR was considered during the future horizon (2011–2035). Figure 15 shows the results obtained in terms of hydraulic head and salinity at a number of observation points. It shows that the sensitivity of hydraulic head is very low. The sensitivity of the salinity, although not very significant, is higher than that observed for hydraulic head. The low sensitivity of the results should be due to the maximum value of SLR considered, 0.19 m in 2035, quite low with respect to the level fluctuations experienced in most of the observation wells (see Fig. 15). For this reason, the sensitivity of the flow and transport solutions is low. We find in the literature other examples in which the sensitivity of seawater intrusion to the SLR would be low. Chang et al. (2011) obtained this conclusion in a synthetic confined coastal aquifer in which recharge is unchanged; Rasmussen et al. (2013) obtained the same conclusion for an inland coastal aquifer with minor SLRs. Nevertheless, other authors, such as Werner and Simmons (2009), showed that in unconfined aquifers the influence of the inland boundary condition can be significant for its sensitivity to SLR.

The methodology proposed in this paper to perform an integrated analysis of future potential GC scenarios (considering LULC, CC and SLR) and their hydrological impacts is general. It can be used to assess the potential status of any coastal aquifer in terms of flow balance components, hydraulic head, and salinity. It includes the definition of future CC scenarios by using an equi-feasible and non-equi-feasible ensemble of projections based on the results of a multi-criteria analysis of the series generated from several regional climatic models with different downscaling approaches. A modelling framework was proposed to assess hydrological impacts of future climatic scenarios on the coastal aquifer based on a density-dependent simulation whose inputs are defined by sequential coupling of rainfall-recharge models, crop irrigation requirements and irrigation return models (a chain of models). This chain of models, calibrated using the available historical data, allows testing of the conceptual approximation of the aquifer behaviour and the propagation of the generated potential future scenarios.

Figure 15Sensitivity of head and salinity obtained for GC1 to a SLR (0.19 m) scenario.


The application of the proposed method allows us to improve our knowledge about the case study and so comprise a tool to support decisions about sustainable adaptation management strategies. In the definition of scenarios and plausible adaptation measures to be analysed participatory processes including the relevant stakeholders might be essential (Pulido-Velazquez et al., 2015). This modelling framework could be useful in the search for consensus (“shared vision” models) between different stakeholders in the definition of the cited scenarios. The limitations and potential future extensions of this work, for example in terms of analyses of uncertainties, are discussed in Sect. 4.1.

4.1 Hypotheses and limitations – usefulness of the results

From the methodological point of view, the proposed approach is general, ambitious and valid scientifically. Nevertheless there are some assumptions and limitations in the application performed that we wanted to highlight and summarize in this section in order to clarify the accuracy and utility of the results obtained. We have grouped them into three categories.

  1. Generation of future potential climatic scenarios

    • The research is focused on the analysis of a future short-term horizon (2011–2035). Other future horizons, such as mid-term and long-term scenarios, in which there should be even higher uncertainties about the impacts of CC because of being further away in time, are not considered.

    • Only the most severe IPCC scenario (RCP8.5) was analysed to assess the most pessimistic impacts in the future short-term scenario.

    • Potential plausible future climate scenarios are defined by combining information coming from different regional climatic models (RCMs) and general circulation models (GCMs).

    • Two downscaling approaches (correction of first- and second-order moments) under two different hypotheses (bias correction and delta change techniques) were applied to generate future climatic series in accordance with RCM simulations. Note that, depending on the problem and the target solution, several downscaling techniques of varying complexity and accuracy (correction of first- and second-order moments, regression approach, quantile mapping, etc.) can be applied by assuming different conceptual approaches, such as bias correction and delta change techniques (Räisänen and Räty, 2012).

    • Two different hypotheses, equi-feasible members or non-equi-feasible members, were applied to define ensembles of the obtained future series for each RCM. They may help to achieve more representative future potential climate scenarios for assessing impacts on aquifer recharge.

  2. Hydrological propagation of the climatic impact on aquifer recharge

    • A simple empirical precipitation-recharge model has been adopted whose inputs are rainfall and E. We have not tested other hydrological models, for example, based on a more physically based or detailed representation of the processes involved in the hydrological balance and the geological structures. We assume that rainfall and T are the variables determining NAR, and their spatiotemporal variability determines the impacts of future potential climatic scenarios on renewable groundwater resources. We do not consider the changes in other variables affecting recharge, such as soil properties, vegetation patterns and land use. They are considered steady, despite their being expected to change according to global climate driving forces and new human actions on a local scale that will be induced by human adaptation to climate and water resource availability (Martínez-Valderrama et al., 2016).

    • We assume that the climatic fields (rainfall and T) taken from the Spain02 project (Herrera et al., 2016) are good enough to approximate the historical climate.

    • Turc's (1954, 1961) model was applied to estimate E. Its results depend on mean annual T and rainfall. Different non-global empirical models could be applied to assess the historical E from T and rainfall time series.

  3. Hydrological impacts on aquifer status: seawater intrusion simulation: in this study we decided to employ a variable-density model instead of a sharp-interface solution, which has been extensively used to define management models because of its simplicity in terms of required parameters and computational burden (e.g. Mantoglou et al., 2004). This is because they better describe the dynamic of real complex coastal aquifers despite the limitations in the available data and the course discretization used for the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer. Better adjustments between observed and modelled hydraulic head and salinity would provide greater confidence in the model predictions. Nevertheless, although there are some differences between observed and simulated data, the uncertainty of the prediction coming from the model growing, and having to be cautious with the conclusions obtained, the fit is good enough to capture the general trend of the hydraulic head and salinity variables within a quite long calibration period (37 years, from 1973 to 2010), and, therefore, to assess general impacts of climate and LULC changes. Note that it is difficult to improve the calibration of the proposed approach in this work for Plana de Oropesa-Torreblanca due to the following facts.

    • The hydrogeological complexity of the aquifer makes it difficult to define a better approach taking into account its spatial heterogeneity, with fractured formations and preferential flow channels existing in the aquifer (Morell and Giménez, 1997). The spatial heterogeneity is handled by means of sequential indicator simulation using the computer code ISIM3D (Gómez-Hernández and Srivastava, 1990).

    • The quality of some observation data is poor. This problem is accentuated when considering the long simulated time period with historical data, which spans from 1973 to 2010. In this way, for a certain observation borehole there are data close in time with measurements quite disparate, which cannot be explained by any physical phenomenon. A statistical processing of data with expert judgment would be advisable to dismiss the wrong data. We have opted for using all available data (as a transparency measurement and in order to ease the reproduction of this exercise by other researchers).

    • The lack of reliable estimates of dispersion coefficients (Naji et al., 1999) may prevent a proper adjustment for the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer.

    • A better fit might be achieved using a more refined spatial discretization, which would allow modelling of the preferential flow channels existing in the aquifer (Morell and Giménez, 1997). However, the high computational burden when solving the variable-density flow and transport equations with SEAWAT prevents the use of a fine grid (e.g. Sreekanth and Datta, 2010).

    • As further research, we intended to couple the seawater intrusion model with a management simulation–optimization model for control and remediation that would further prevent the use of a fine grid.

  4. Analysis of uncertainty in impacts: note that the information about seawater intrusion status provided by the analyses of flow balance is quite limited. We have not used indices based on the salinity distribution to assess the global intrusion status (see Baena-Ruiz et al., 2018). Finally, in this paper we do not intend to perform a detailed analysis of uncertainty in impacts, which could be deeply analysed as a further study. In order to assess the uncertainty in hydrological impacts it would be more appropriate to assess results from each individual climate model. Note that it would require us to deal with different sources of uncertainty (Matott et al., 2009). The complexity is even greater for the presented methodology, since it entails the coupling of several numerical codes and a large amount of data and a long simulation time period.

5 Conclusions

We have proposed a general method to perform an integrated analysis of the potential impacts of future CC, LULC change and SLR in a coastal aquifer. It is assessed in terms of flow balance components, hydraulic head, and salinity distribution. It includes the definition of future CC scenarios by using equi-feasible and non-equi-feasible ensembles of projections based on the results of a multi-criteria analysis of the series generated from several regional climatic models with different downscaling approaches. A modelling framework defined with a chain of models was proposed to assess hydrological impacts of these future climatic scenarios.

It has been applied in the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer assuming some hypotheses or simplifications. Representative future CC scenarios are generated by applying the proposed method A future LULC scenario defined in accordance with the plan approved by the local government (PGOU Torreblance, 2009). Four GC scenarios were defined by combining the LULC scenario and the CC scenarios. These GC scenarios have been propagated to assess hydrological impact by simulating them within a coupled modelling framework based on a density-dependent model whose inputs are defined by a sequential coupling of different models (rainfall-recharge models, crop irrigation requirements and irrigation return models). The historical status shows that the majority of the aquifer is affected by seawater intrusion. The analysis of the future flow balance components does not show an increment in the global intrusion. These results show a lower sensitivity to the LULC than to the GC scenarios in which the impacts also include climate change. These global scenarios' simulations show a significant increase (with respect to a BL scenario with no GC) in the variability of the flow budget components and in the salinity. The impacts on the aquifer salinity will be heterogeneous. We observed specific areas where the situation gets worse and another where it will clearly improve. The proposed analysis is valuable for improving our knowledge about the aquifer and so comprising a tool to support decisions about sustainable adaptation management strategies. From an operational point of view, this modelling framework could also be useful in the search for a consensus (“shared vision” models) between different stakeholders involved in the management of the aquifer.

Data availability

The climatic historical data were taken from the Spain02 project (available at ). Regional climate model (RCM) simulations of the future climate scenarios were obtained from the CORDEX project (available at Chloride concentration and hydraulic head data were taken from the webpage of the Júcar River Basin Authority (available at

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Special issue statement

This article is part of the special issue “Assessing impacts and adaptation to global change in water resource systems depending on natural storage from groundwater and/or snowpacks”. It is not associated with a conference.


This research work has been partially supported by the GESINHIMPADAPT project (CGL2013-48424-C2-2-R) with Spanish MINECO funds, the PMAFI/06/14 project with UCAM funds and the Plan de Garantía Juvenil from MINECO, co-financing by BEI and FSE. We would like to thank the Spain02 (AEMET and UC) and CORDEX projects and the Júcar Water Agency (CHJ) for the data provided for this study. We appreciate the valuable comments and suggestions provided by the editor and two anonymous referees.

Edited by: Jesús Carrera
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees


Alcalá, F. J. and Custodio, E.: Spatial average aquifer recharge through atmospheric ride mass balance and its uncertainty in continental Spain, Hydrol. Process, 28, 218–236, 2014. 

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, (last access: May 2018), 1998. 

Arora, V. K.: The use of the aridity index to assess climate change effect on annual runoff, J. Hydrol., 265, 164–177, 2002. 

Arslan, H. and Demir, Y.: Impacts of seawater intrusion on soil salinity and alkalinity in Bafra Plain, Turkey, Environ. Monit. Assess., 185, 1027–1040, 2013. 

Baena-Ruiz, L., Pulido-Velazquez, D., Collados-Lara, A. J., Renau-Pruñonosa, A., and Morell, I.: Global assessment of seawater intrusion problems (status and vulnerability), Water Resour. Manage., 32, 2681–2700,, 2018. 

Benini, L., Antonellini, M., Laghi, M., and Mollema, P. N.: Assessment of Water Resources Availability and Groundwater Salinization in Future Climate and Land use Change Scenarios: A Case Study from a Coastal Drainage Basin in Italy, Water Resour. Manage., 30, 731–745, 2016. 

Brunet, M., Casado, M. J., de Castro, M., Galán, P., López, J. A., Martín, J. M., Pastor, A., Petisco, E., Ramos, P., Ribalaygua, J., Rodríguez, E., Sanz, I., and Torres, L.: Generación de escenarios regionalizados de cambio climático para España, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino; Agencia Estatal de Meteorología, Madrid, 158 pp., 2009. 

Budyko, M. I.: Climate and Life, Academic Press, New York, 508 pp., 1974. 

Chang, S., Clement, T. P., Simpson, M., and Lee, K.: Does sea-level rise have an impact on saltwater intrusion?, Adv. Water Resour., 34, 1283–1291,, 2011. 

CHJ – Júcar Water Agency: Júcar River Basin Plan, Demarcación hidrográfica del Júcar, Confederación Hidrográfica del Júcar, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Madrid, Spain, 2015. 

Church, J. A., Clark, P. U., Cazenave, A., Gregory, J. M., Jevrejeva, S., Levermann, A., Merrifield, M. A., Milne, G. A., Nerem, R. S., Nunn, P. D., Payne, A. J., Pfeffer, W. T., Stammer, D., and Unnikrishnan, A. S.: Sea Level Change, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2013. 

Control networks of the Júcar River Basin Authority:, last access: 28 May 2018. 

CORDEX PROJECT: The Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment CORDEX, Program sponsored by World Climate Research Program (WCRP), available at: (last access: 4 May 2017), 2013. 

CORDEX Regional Data Portals:, last access: 28 May 2018. 

Coutagne, A.: Quelques considérations sur le pouvoir évaporant de l'atmosphere, le déficit d'écoulement effectif et le déficit d'écoulement maximum, La Houille Blanche, 3, 360–374,, 1954. 

Custodio, E.: Coastal Aquifers of Europe: an overview, Hydrogeol. J., 18, 269–280, 2010. 

Doulgeris, C. and Zissis, T.: 3D variable density flow simulation to evaluate dumping schemes in coastal aquifers, Water Resour. Manage., 28, 4943–4956, 2014. 

Dragoni, W. and Sukhija, B.S.: Climate change and groundwater: a short review, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ., 288, 1–12, 2008. 

EEA – European Environment Agency: Global and European sea-level rise, (last access: 4 May 2017), 2014. 

Escriva-Bou, A., Pulido-Velazquez, M., and Pulido-Velazquez, D.: The Economic Value of Adaptive Strategies to Global Change for Water Management in Spain's Jucar Basin, J. Water Resour. Pl. Manage., 143, 04017005,, 2016. 

España, S., Alcalá, F. J., Vallejos, A., and Pulido-Bosch, A.: A GIS tool for modelling annual diffuse infiltration on a plot scale, Comput. Geosci., 54, 318–325, 2013. 

Feranec, J., Hazeu, G., Soukup, T., and Jaffrain, G.: Determining changes and flows in European landscapes 1990–2000 using CORINE land cover data, Appl. Geogr., 30, 19–35, 2010. 

Fujinawa, K.: Anthroscape of the Mediterranean Coastal Area in the Context of Hydrogeology: Projected Impacts of Climate Change, in: Sustainable Land Management, edited by: Kapur, S., Eswaran, H., and Blum, W., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 311–332,, 2011. 

Gerrits, A. M. J., Savenije, H. H. G., Veling, E. J. M., and Pfister, L.: Analytical derivation of the Budyko curve based on rainfall characteristics and a simple evaporation model, Water Resour. Res., 45, W04403,, 2009. 

Gómez-Hernández, J. J., and Journel, A. G.: Joint simulation of MultiGaussian random variables, Geostatistics tróia92, edited by: Soares, A., in: Vol. 1, Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 85–94, 1993. 

Gómez-Hernández, J. J. and Srivastava, R. M.: ISIM3D: An ANSI-C three dimensional multiple indicator conditional simulation program, Comput. Geosci., 16, 395–440, 1990. 

Gorelick, S. M. and Zheng, C.: Global change and the groundwater management challenge, Water Resour. Res., 51, 3031–3051,, 2015. 

Green, T. R., Taniguchi, M., Kooi, H., Gurdak, J. J., Allen, D. M., Hiscock, K. M., Treidel, H., and Aureli, A.: Beneath the surface of global change: impacts of climate change on groundwater, J. Hydrol., 405, 532–560,, 2011. 

Grundmann, J., Schutze, N., and Schmitz, G. H.: Towards an integrated arid zone water management using simulation-based optimisation, Environ. Earth Sci., 65, 1381–1394,, 2012. 

Guo, F., Jiang, G., Polk, J. S., Huang, X. F., and Huang, S. Y.: Resilience of Groundwater Impacted by Land Use and Climate Change in a Karst Aquifer, South China, Water Environ. Res., 87, 1990–1998, 2015. 

Guo, W. and Langevin, C. D.: User's guide to SEAWAT: a computer program for simulation of three-dimensional variable-density groundwater flow, Report No. US Geol. Surv. Open File 01-434, US Geological Survey, Tallahassee, Florida, 2002. 

Haerter, J. O., Hagemann, S., Moseley, C., and Piani, C.: Climate model bias correction and the role of timescales, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1065–1079,, 2011. 

Herrera, S., Fernández, J., and Gutiérrez, J. M.: Update of the Spain02 Gridded Observational Dataset for Euro-CORDEX evaluation: Assessing the Effect of the Interpolation Methodology, Int. J. Climatol., 36, 900–908,, 2016. 

Ketabchi, H., Mahmoodzadeh, D., Ataie-Ashtiani, B., and Simmons, C. T.: Sea-level rise impacts on seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers. Review and integration, J. Hydrol., 535, 235–255, 2016. 

Kirn, L., Mudarra, M., Marín, A., Andreo, B., and Hartmann, A.: Improved Assessment of Groundwater Recharge in a Mediterranean Karst Region: Andalusia, Spain, in: Renard P. and Bertrand, C., in: EuroKarst 2016, Neuchâtel, Advances in Karst Science, Springer, Cham, 117–125,, 2017. 

Llopis-Albert, C. and Capilla, J. E.: Stochastic inverse modelling of hydraulic conductivity fields taking into account independent stochastic structures: A 3D case study, J. Hydrol., 391, 277–288,, 2010. 

Llopis-Albert, C. and Pulido-Velazquez, D.: Discussion about the validity of sharp-interface models to deal with seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers, Hydrol. Process., 28, 3642–3654,, 2014. 

Llopis-Albert, C. and Pulido-Velazquez, D.: Using MODFLOW code to approach transient hydraulic head with a sharp-interface solution, Hydrol. Process., 29, 2052–2064,, 2015. 

Llopis-Albert, C., Merigó, J. M., and Xu, Y.: A coupled stochastic inverse/sharp interface seawater intrusion approach for coastal aquifers under groundwater parameter uncertainty, J. Hydrol., 540, 774–783,, 2016. 

Mantoglou, A., Papantoniou, M., and Giannoulopoulos, P.: Management of coastal aquifers based on nonlinear optimization and evolutionary algorithms, J. Hydrol., 297, 209–228,, 2004. 

Martínez-Valderrama, J., Ibáñez, J., Del Barrio, G., Sanjuán, M. E., Alcalá, F. J., Martínez-Vicente, S., Ruiz, A., and Puigdefábregas, J.: Present and future of desertification in Spain: implementation of a surveillance system to prevent land degradation, Sci. Total Environ., 563–564, 169–178, 2016. 

Matott, L. S., Babendreier, J. E., and Purucker, S. T.: Evaluating uncertainty in integrated environmental models: a review of concepts and tools, Water Resour. Res., 45, W06421,, 2009. 

McDonald, M. G. and Harbough, A. W.: A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Groundwater Flow Model, US Geological Survey Technical Manual of Water Resources Investigation, Book 6, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, p. 586, 1988. 

Molina, J. L., Pulido-Velázquez, D., García-Aróstegui, J. L., and Pulido-Velázquez, M.: Dynamic Bayesian Networks as a Decision Support tool for assessing Climate Change impacts on highly stressed groundwater systems, J. Hydrol., 479, 113–129,, 2013. 

Morell, I. and Giménez, E.: Hydrogeochemical analysis of salinization processes in the coastal aquifer of Oropesa (Castellón, Spain), Environ. Geol., 29, 118–131, 1997. 

Naji, A., Cheng, A. D., and Quazar, D.: BEM solution of stochastic seawater intrusion problems, Eng. Anal. Bound. Elements, 23, 529–537,, 1999. 

PGOU Torreblanca: Plan General de Ordenación Urbana de Torreblanca, Ayuntamiento de Torreblanca, Torreblanca, 2009. 

Pulido-Velazquez, D., Garrote, L., Andreu, J., Martin-Carrasco, F. J., and Iglesias, A.: A methodology to diagnose the effect of climate change and to identify adaptive strategies to reduce its impacts in conjunctive-use systems at basin scale, J. Hydrol., 405, 110–122,, 2011. 

Pulido-Velazquez, D., García-Aróstegui, J. L., Molina, J. L., and Pulido-Velázquez, M.: Assessment of future groundwater recharge in semi-arid regions under climate change scenarios (Serral-Salinas aquifer, SE Spain). Could increased rainfall variability increase the recharge rate?, Hydrol. Process., 29, 828–844,, 2014. 

Pulido-Velazquez, D., Collados-Lara, A.-J., and Alcalá, F. J.: Assessing impacts of future potential climate change scenarios on aquifer recharge in continental Spain, J. Hydrol.,, in press, 2017. 

Pulido-Velazquez, M., Peña-Haro, S., García-Prats, A., Mocholi-Almudever, A. F., Henriquez-Dole, L., Macian-Sorribes, H., and Lopez-Nicolas, A.: Integrated assessment of the impact of climate and land use changes on groundwater quantity and quality in the Mancha Oriental system (Spain), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1677–1693,, 2015. 

Räisänen, J. and Räty, O.: Projections of daily mean temperature variability in the future: cross-validation tests with ENSEMBLES regional climate simulations, Clim. Dynam., 41, 1553–1568,, 2013. 

Rasmussen, P., Sonnenborg, T. O., Goncear, G., and Hinsby, K.: Assessing impacts of climate change, SLR, and drainage canals on saltwater intrusion to coastal aquifer, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 421–443,, 2013. 

Renau-Pruñonosa, A., Morell, I., and Pulido-Velazquez, D.: A methodology to analyse and assess pumping management strategies in coastal aquifers to avoid degradation due to seawater intrusion problems, Water Resour. Manage., 30, 4823–4837,, 2016. 

Robins, N. S., Jones, H. K., and Ellis, J.: An aquifer management case study – The Chalk of the English South Downs, Water Resour. Manage., 13, 205–218, 1999. 

Rosenthal, E., Vinokurov, A., Ronen D., Magaritz M., and Moshkovitz, S.: Anthropogenically induced salinization of groundwater: A case study from the Coastal Plain aquifer of Israel, J. Contam. Hydrol., 11, 149–171, 1992. 

Roth, G. D.: Meteorología, Formaciones nubosas y otros fenómenos meteorológicos, Situaciones meteorológicas generales, Pronósticos del tiempo Barcelona, Ediciones Omega, Barcelona, Spain, p. 301, 2003. 

Shammas, M. I. and Thunvik, R.: Predictive simulation of flow and solute transport for managing the Salalah coastal aquifer, Oman, Water Resour. Manage., 23, 2941, 2009.  

Sola, F., Vallejos, A., Moreno, L., López-Geta, J. A., and Pulido-Bosch, A.: Identification of hydrogeochemical process linked to marine intrusion induced by pumping of a semi-confined Mediterranean coastal aquifer, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 10, 63–76, 2013. 

Spain02: A set of gridded precipitation and temperature datasets:, last access: 28 May 2018. 

Sreekanth, J. and Datta, B.: Multi-objective management of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers using genetic programming and modular neural network based surrogate models, J. Hydrol., 39, 245–256, 2010. 

Tuñon, J.: Determinación experimental del balance hídrico del suelo y evaluación de la contaminación asociada a las prácticas agrícolas, PhD Thesis, Universitat Jaume I de Castellón, Castellón, Spain, 2000. 

Turc, L.: Water balance of soils: relationship between precipitation, evapotranspiration and runoff, Ann. Agron., 5, 49–595 and 6, 5–131, 1954. 

Turc, L.: Estimation of irrigation water requirements, potential evapotranspiration: A simple climatic formula evolved up to date, Ann. Agron. 12, 13—49, 1961. 

Unsal, B., Yagbasan, O., and Yazicigil, H.: Assessing the impacts of climate change on sustainable management of coastal aquifers, Environ. Earth Sci., 72, 2183–2193, 2014. 

Vallejos, A., Sola, F., and Pulido-Bosch, A.: Processes Influencing Groundwater Level and the Freshwater-Saltwater Interface in a Coastal Aquifer, Water Resour. Manage., 29, 679–697,, 2015. 

Watanabe, S., Kanae, S., Seto, S., Yeh, P. J.-F., Hirabayashi, Y., and Oki, T.: Intercomparison of bias-correction methods for monthly temperature and precipitation simulated by multiple climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D23114,, 2012. 

Werner, A. D. and Simmons, C. T.: Impact of sea-level rise on sea water intrusion in coastal aquifers, Ground Water, 47, 197–204, 2009. 

Yechieli, Y. and Sivan, O.: The distribution of saline groundwater and its relation to the hydraulic conditions of aquifers and aquitards: example from Israel, Hydrogeol. J., 19, 71–87, 2011. 

Yechieli, Y., Shalev, E., Wollman, S., Kiro, Y., and Kafri, U.: Response of the Mediterranean and Dead Sea coastal aquifers to sea level variations, Water Resour. Res., 46, W12550,, 2010. 

Zheng, C. and Wang, P.: MT3DMS: A Modular Three-Dimensional Multispecies Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems, Documentation and User's Guide, Alabama University, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 1999. 

Short summary
We have developed a method to assess hydrological impacts of future potential global change (GC) scenarios in a coastal aquifer, the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer. Quantity and quality issues are simultaneously considered. It includes the generation of potential GC scenarios involving different sources of uncertainty and an integrated modelling framework to assess their impacts. It is a valuable tool to improve our aquifer knowledge and to help in the analysis of management strategies.