Articles | Volume 22, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3033-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3033-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Extrapolating regional probability of drying of headwater streams using discrete observations and gauging networks
Aurélien Beaufort
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Irstea, UR RiverLy, centre de Lyon-Villeurbanne, 5 rue de la Doua CS
20244, 69625 Villeurbanne, France
Nicolas Lamouroux
Irstea, UR RiverLy, centre de Lyon-Villeurbanne, 5 rue de la Doua CS
20244, 69625 Villeurbanne, France
Hervé Pella
Irstea, UR RiverLy, centre de Lyon-Villeurbanne, 5 rue de la Doua CS
20244, 69625 Villeurbanne, France
Thibault Datry
Irstea, UR RiverLy, centre de Lyon-Villeurbanne, 5 rue de la Doua CS
20244, 69625 Villeurbanne, France
Eric Sauquet
Irstea, UR RiverLy, centre de Lyon-Villeurbanne, 5 rue de la Doua CS
20244, 69625 Villeurbanne, France
Viewed
Total article views: 2,986 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Nov 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,839 | 1,063 | 84 | 2,986 | 80 | 93 |
- HTML: 1,839
- PDF: 1,063
- XML: 84
- Total: 2,986
- BibTeX: 80
- EndNote: 93
Total article views: 2,287 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 24 May 2018)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,389 | 828 | 70 | 2,287 | 68 | 76 |
- HTML: 1,389
- PDF: 828
- XML: 70
- Total: 2,287
- BibTeX: 68
- EndNote: 76
Total article views: 699 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Nov 2017)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
450 | 235 | 14 | 699 | 12 | 17 |
- HTML: 450
- PDF: 235
- XML: 14
- Total: 699
- BibTeX: 12
- EndNote: 17
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,986 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,860 with geography defined
and 126 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,287 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,188 with geography defined
and 99 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 699 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 672 with geography defined
and 27 with unknown origin.
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
28 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Predicting Streamflow Duration From Crowd‐Sourced Flow Observations D. Peterson et al. 10.1029/2023WR035093
- A revised classification of temperate lowland groundwater‐fed headwater streams based on their flora C. Westwood et al. 10.1111/wej.12561
- The Case for an Open Water Balance: Re‐envisioning Network Design and Data Analysis for a Complex, Uncertain World S. Kampf et al. 10.1029/2019WR026699
- Beyond Counting Zeroes: Using Entropy-Based Hydrologic Signatures and Classification for Streamflow Intermittency Assessment I. Niadas & C. Makropoulos 10.1007/s11269-024-03881-1
- Mediterranean intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams: Challenges in monitoring complexity A. Borg Galea et al. 10.1002/eco.2149
- Global prevalence of non-perennial rivers and streams M. Messager et al. 10.1038/s41586-021-03565-5
- Conceptualization and pilot application of a model-based environmental flow assessment adapted for intermittent rivers C. Theodoropoulos et al. 10.1007/s00027-018-0605-0
- Recognition of stream drying based on benthic macroinvertebrates: A new tool in Central Europe M. Straka et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105486
- Dry, drier, driest: Differentiating flow patterns across a gradient of intermittency B. Kelly & L. Bruckerhoff 10.1002/rra.4289
- Improving calibration of groundwater flow models using headwater streamflow intermittence R. Abhervé et al. 10.1002/hyp.15167
- Intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams: Perspectives for critical zone science and research on socio‐ecosystems O. Fovet et al. 10.1002/wat2.1523
- Classifying Streamflow Duration: The Scientific Basis and an Operational Framework for Method Development K. Fritz et al. 10.3390/w12092545
- Are temporary stream observations useful for calibrating a lumped hydrological model? M. Scheller et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130686
- Stream drying bioindication in Central Europe: A Biodrought Index accuracy assessment M. Straka et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108045
- A classification approach to reconstruct local daily drying dynamics at headwater streams A. Beaufort et al. 10.1002/hyp.13445
- Pervasive changes in stream intermittency across the United States S. Zipper et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac14ec
- Zero or not? Causes and consequences of zero‐flow stream gage readings M. Zimmer et al. 10.1002/wat2.1436
- Beyond Streamflow: Call for a National Data Repository of Streamflow Presence for Streams and Rivers in the United States K. Jaeger et al. 10.3390/w13121627
- Water restrictions under climate change: a Rhône–Mediterranean perspective combining bottom-up and top-down approaches E. Sauquet et al. 10.5194/hess-23-3683-2019
- Assessing placement bias of the global river gauge network C. Krabbenhoft et al. 10.1038/s41893-022-00873-0
- How well can people observe the flow state of temporary streams? M. Scheller et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1352697
- Influence of landscape and hydrological factors on stream–air temperature relationships at regional scale A. Beaufort et al. 10.1002/hyp.13608
- Efficiency of invertebrate-based bioassessment for evaluating the ecological status of streams along a gradient of flow intermittence J. Crabot et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108440
- Predicting flow intermittence in France under climate change E. Sauquet et al. 10.1080/02626667.2021.1963444
- Headwater streams and inland wetlands: Status and advancements of geospatial datasets and maps across the United States J. Christensen et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104230
- Small increases in stream drying can dramatically reduce ecosystem connectivity M. Malish et al. 10.1002/ecs2.4450
- Are all rivers equal? The role of education in attitudes towards temporary and perennial rivers C. Leigh et al. 10.1002/pan3.22
- Classification and trends in intermittent river flow regimes in Australia, northwestern Europe and USA: A global perspective E. Sauquet et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126170
28 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Predicting Streamflow Duration From Crowd‐Sourced Flow Observations D. Peterson et al. 10.1029/2023WR035093
- A revised classification of temperate lowland groundwater‐fed headwater streams based on their flora C. Westwood et al. 10.1111/wej.12561
- The Case for an Open Water Balance: Re‐envisioning Network Design and Data Analysis for a Complex, Uncertain World S. Kampf et al. 10.1029/2019WR026699
- Beyond Counting Zeroes: Using Entropy-Based Hydrologic Signatures and Classification for Streamflow Intermittency Assessment I. Niadas & C. Makropoulos 10.1007/s11269-024-03881-1
- Mediterranean intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams: Challenges in monitoring complexity A. Borg Galea et al. 10.1002/eco.2149
- Global prevalence of non-perennial rivers and streams M. Messager et al. 10.1038/s41586-021-03565-5
- Conceptualization and pilot application of a model-based environmental flow assessment adapted for intermittent rivers C. Theodoropoulos et al. 10.1007/s00027-018-0605-0
- Recognition of stream drying based on benthic macroinvertebrates: A new tool in Central Europe M. Straka et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105486
- Dry, drier, driest: Differentiating flow patterns across a gradient of intermittency B. Kelly & L. Bruckerhoff 10.1002/rra.4289
- Improving calibration of groundwater flow models using headwater streamflow intermittence R. Abhervé et al. 10.1002/hyp.15167
- Intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams: Perspectives for critical zone science and research on socio‐ecosystems O. Fovet et al. 10.1002/wat2.1523
- Classifying Streamflow Duration: The Scientific Basis and an Operational Framework for Method Development K. Fritz et al. 10.3390/w12092545
- Are temporary stream observations useful for calibrating a lumped hydrological model? M. Scheller et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130686
- Stream drying bioindication in Central Europe: A Biodrought Index accuracy assessment M. Straka et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108045
- A classification approach to reconstruct local daily drying dynamics at headwater streams A. Beaufort et al. 10.1002/hyp.13445
- Pervasive changes in stream intermittency across the United States S. Zipper et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac14ec
- Zero or not? Causes and consequences of zero‐flow stream gage readings M. Zimmer et al. 10.1002/wat2.1436
- Beyond Streamflow: Call for a National Data Repository of Streamflow Presence for Streams and Rivers in the United States K. Jaeger et al. 10.3390/w13121627
- Water restrictions under climate change: a Rhône–Mediterranean perspective combining bottom-up and top-down approaches E. Sauquet et al. 10.5194/hess-23-3683-2019
- Assessing placement bias of the global river gauge network C. Krabbenhoft et al. 10.1038/s41893-022-00873-0
- How well can people observe the flow state of temporary streams? M. Scheller et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1352697
- Influence of landscape and hydrological factors on stream–air temperature relationships at regional scale A. Beaufort et al. 10.1002/hyp.13608
- Efficiency of invertebrate-based bioassessment for evaluating the ecological status of streams along a gradient of flow intermittence J. Crabot et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108440
- Predicting flow intermittence in France under climate change E. Sauquet et al. 10.1080/02626667.2021.1963444
- Headwater streams and inland wetlands: Status and advancements of geospatial datasets and maps across the United States J. Christensen et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104230
- Small increases in stream drying can dramatically reduce ecosystem connectivity M. Malish et al. 10.1002/ecs2.4450
- Are all rivers equal? The role of education in attitudes towards temporary and perennial rivers C. Leigh et al. 10.1002/pan3.22
- Classification and trends in intermittent river flow regimes in Australia, northwestern Europe and USA: A global perspective E. Sauquet et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126170
Latest update: 16 Aug 2024
Short summary
Streams which may stop flowing are poorly gauged. To improve their characterisation, we use an extended network providing monthly visual observations stating whether streams are flowing or not across France. These observations are combined with discharge and groundwater level in models to predict daily regional probability of drying. This approach allows identification of the most impacted regions by flow intermittence and estimation of the probability of drying dynamics over the last 27 years.
Streams which may stop flowing are poorly gauged. To improve their characterisation, we use an...