59 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Time‐Varying Sensitivity Analysis Reveals Relationships Between Watershed Climate and Variations in Annual Parameter Importance in Regions With Strong Interannual Variability R. Basijokaite & C. Kelleher 10.1029/2020WR028544
2. Identification of parameter importance for benzene transport in the unsaturated zone using global sensitivity analysis M. Cohen et al. 10.5194/hess-28-1585-2024
3. Experimental study and modeling of final fracture conductivity during acid fracturing H. Mehrjoo et al. 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109192
4. A Computationally Efficient Method for Estimating Multi‐Model Process Sensitivity Index H. Dai et al. 10.1029/2022WR033263
5. Comparative Assessment of Two Global Sensitivity Approaches Considering Model and Parameter Uncertainty H. Dai et al. 10.1029/2023WR036096
6. Sensitivity analysis in the wavelet domain: a comparison study G. Chiogna et al. 10.1007/s00477-023-02654-3
7. Assessment of Hydrological Processes in an Ungauged Catchment in Eritrea E. Baioni et al. 10.3390/hydrology9050068
8. Modeling parametric uncertainty in PDEs models via Physics-Informed Neural Networks M. Panahi et al. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104870
9. Extremum sensitivity analysis with polynomial Monte Carlo filtering C. Wong et al. 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107609
10. Uncertainty Quantification and Global Sensitivity Analysis of Subsurface Flow Parameters to Gravimetric Variations During Pumping Tests in Unconfined Aquifers F. Maina & A. Guadagnini 10.1002/2017WR021655
11. Global sensitivity analysis: A Bayesian learning based polynomial chaos approach B. Bhattacharyya 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109539
12. Stochastic Inverse Modeling and Parametric Uncertainty of Sediment Deposition Processes Across Geologic Time Scales S. Patani et al. 10.1007/s11004-020-09911-z
13. A two-step Bayesian network-based process sensitivity analysis for complex nitrogen reactive transport modeling H. Dai et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130903
14. Analysis of the performance of a crude-oil desalting system based on historical data E. Ranaee et al. 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.120046
15. Distribution-based sensitivity analysis from a generic input-output sample F. Pianosi & T. Wagener 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.07.019
16. Implications of uncertain bioreactive parameters on a complex reaction network of atrazine biodegradation in soil G. Porta et al. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.08.002
17. Machine Learning Accelerates Parameter Optimization and Uncertainty Assessment of a Land Surface Model Y. Sawada 10.1029/2020JD032688
18. Similarities and differences in the sensitivity of soil organic matter (SOM) dynamics to biogeochemical parameters for different vegetation inputs and climates G. Ceriotti et al. 10.1007/s00477-020-01868-z
19. Probabilistic assessment of failure of infiltration structures under model and parametric uncertainty A. Dell’Oca et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118466
20. Probabilistic indicators for soil and groundwater contamination risk assessment D. la Cecilia et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106424
21. Local and Global Sensitivity Analysis of Cr (VI) Geogenic Leakage Under Uncertain Environmental Conditions G. Ceriotti et al. 10.1029/2018WR022857
22. Sensitivity analysis of factors controlling earth fissures due to excessive groundwater pumping Y. Li et al. 10.1007/s00477-022-02237-8
23. An effective strategy for combining variance- and distribution-based global sensitivity analysis G. Baroni & T. Francke 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104851
24. Operational sensitivity analysis of flooding volume in urban areas L. Sandoval et al. 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105928
25. A comprehensive framework for stochastic calibration and sensitivity analysis of large-scale groundwater models A. Manzoni et al. 10.5194/hess-28-2661-2024
26. Global sensitivity analysis of mass transfer and reaction dynamics for electrokinetic transport in porous media R. Sprocati et al. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2025.104887
27. Modeling solute transport and mixing in heterogeneous porous media under turbulent flow conditions E. Baioni et al. 10.1063/5.0065734
28. Stochastic inverse modeling and global sensitivity analysis to assist interpretation of drilling mud losses in fractured formations A. Russian et al. 10.1007/s00477-019-01729-4
29. A multi-method Generalized Global Sensitivity Matrix approach to accounting for the dynamical nature of earth and environmental systems models S. Razavi & H. Gupta 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.12.002
30. Integration of moment equations in a reduced-order modeling strategy for Monte Carlo simulations of groundwater flow C. Xia et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125257
31. Global Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Interpretive Models With Uncertain Parameters A. Dell'Oca et al. 10.1029/2019WR025754
32. Influential sources of uncertainty in glyphosate biochemical degradation in soil D. la Cecilia & F. Maggi 10.1016/j.matcom.2020.01.003
33. The Future of Sensitivity Analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support S. Razavi et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104954
34. On Multi‐Model Assessment of Complex Degradation Paths: The Fate of Diclofenac and Its Transformation Products L. Ceresa et al. 10.1029/2022WR033183
35. Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of seismic metabarriers F. Zeighami et al. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115415
36. Assessing the impacts of hydrodynamic parameter uncertainties on simulated evapotranspiration in a mountainous watershed F. Maina et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127620
37. Construction of Grid Reliability Assessment Model Based on Sensitivity Analysis L. Zhang et al. 10.1155/2022/2231704
38. Stochastic inverse modeling of transient laboratory-scale three-dimensional two-phase core flooding scenarios A. Dell'Oca et al. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.123716
39. Sensitivity Analysis and Quantification of the Role of Governing Transport Mechanisms and Parameters in a Gas Flow Model for Low-Permeability Porous Media L. Sandoval et al. 10.1007/s11242-022-01755-x
40. Risk of pesticide pollution at the global scale F. Tang et al. 10.1038/s41561-021-00712-5
41. Multi-criteria, time dependent sensitivity analysis of an event-oriented, physically-based, distributed sediment and runoff model M. Meles et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126268
42. Sensitivity-based Parameter Calibration of Single- and Dual-continuum Coreflooding Simulation Models E. Ranaee et al. 10.1007/s11242-022-01854-9
43. VARS-TOOL: A toolbox for comprehensive, efficient, and robust sensitivity and uncertainty analysis S. Razavi et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.10.005
44. Uncertainty propagation in coupled hydrological models using winding stairs and null-space Monte Carlo methods E. Moges et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125341
45. Revisiting the Basis of Sensitivity Analysis for Dynamical Earth System Models H. Gupta & S. Razavi 10.1029/2018WR022668
46. Generalized Polynomial Chaos Expansion for Fast and Accurate Uncertainty Quantification in Geomechanical Modelling C. Zoccarato et al. 10.3390/a13070156
47. Copula density-driven metrics for sensitivity analysis: Theory and application to flow and transport in porous media A. Dell'Oca et al. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103714
48. Sensitivity Analysis: An Operational Picture A. Dell’Oca 10.1029/2022WR033780
49. Assessment of alternative adsorption models and global sensitivity analysis to characterize hexavalent chromium loss from soil to surface runoff C. Xia et al. 10.1002/hyp.13233
50. Comparison of data-driven uncertainty quantification methods for a carbon dioxide storage benchmark scenario M. Köppel et al. 10.1007/s10596-018-9785-x
51. Uncertainty analysis for seawater intrusion in fractured coastal aquifers: Effects of fracture location, aperture, density and hydrodynamic parameters B. Koohbor et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.01.052
52. Global sensitivity analyses of multiple conceptual models with uncertain parameters driving groundwater flow in a regional-scale sedimentary aquifer E. Bianchi Janetti et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.035
53. A note on tools for prediction under uncertainty and identifiability of SIR-like dynamical systems for epidemiology C. Piazzola et al. 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108514
54. Spatially distributed sensitivity of simulated global groundwater heads and flows to hydraulic conductivity, groundwater recharge, and surface water body parameterization R. Reinecke et al. 10.5194/hess-23-4561-2019
55. Technical Note: Improved sampling of behavioral subsurface flow model parameters using active subspaces D. Erdal & O. Cirpka 10.5194/hess-24-4567-2020
56. Assessment and uncertainty quantification of onshore geological CO2 storage capacity in China E. Ranaee et al. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103804
57. VARS and HDMR Sensitivity Analysis of Groundwater Flow Modeling through an Alluvial Aquifer Subject to Tidal Effects J. Samper et al. 10.3390/w16172526
58. Time- and depth-resolved mechanistic assessment of water stress in Australian ecosystems under the CMIP6 scenarios M. Guglielmo et al. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103837
59. The Role of Subsurface Flow on Evapotranspiration: A Global Sensitivity Analysis F. Maina & E. Siirila‐Woodburn 10.1029/2019WR026612