Articles | Volume 21, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3507-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3507-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
13 Jul 2017
Research article |
| 13 Jul 2017
Marginal cost curves for water footprint reduction in irrigated agriculture: guiding a cost-effective reduction of crop water consumption to a permit or benchmark level
Abebe D. Chukalla
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
Maarten S. Krol
Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
Arjen Y. Hoekstra
Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
Institute of Water Policy, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy,
National University of Singapore, Singapore
Viewed
Total article views: 3,779 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Feb 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,219 | 1,465 | 95 | 3,779 | 61 | 102 |
- HTML: 2,219
- PDF: 1,465
- XML: 95
- Total: 3,779
- BibTeX: 61
- EndNote: 102
Total article views: 2,858 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 13 Jul 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,666 | 1,122 | 70 | 2,858 | 52 | 70 |
- HTML: 1,666
- PDF: 1,122
- XML: 70
- Total: 2,858
- BibTeX: 52
- EndNote: 70
Total article views: 921 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Feb 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 553 | 343 | 25 | 921 | 9 | 32 |
- HTML: 553
- PDF: 343
- XML: 25
- Total: 921
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 32
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,779 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,597 with geography defined
and 182 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,858 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,704 with geography defined
and 154 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 921 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 893 with geography defined
and 28 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Understanding agricultural water footprint variability to improve water management in Chile V. Novoa et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.127
- Financial Feasibility of Water Conservation in Agriculture C. Siderius et al. 10.1029/2020EF001726
- Applying grey water footprint assessment to achieve environmental sustainability within a nation under intensive agriculture: a high-resolution assessment for common agrochemicals and crops F. Karandish 10.1007/s12665-019-8199-y
- The Water Footprint Concept and Water's Grand Environmental Challenges R. Hogeboom 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.010
- Sustainable water use through multiple cropping systems and precision irrigation A. Brar et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130117
- Socioeconomic benefits of conserving Iran’s water resources through modifying agricultural practices and water management strategies F. Karandish 10.1007/s13280-021-01534-w
- Water Allocation and Integrative Management of Precision Irrigation: A Systematic Review Z. Liang et al. 10.3390/w12113135
- Dietary recommendations in Spain –affordability and environmental sustainability? S. González-García et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120125
- Dynamic assessment of the impacts of global warming on nitrate losses from a subsurface-drained rainfed-canola field F. Haghnazari et al. 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106420
- Trade‐off between nutritive value improvement and crop water use for an alfalfa–grass system M. Dhakal et al. 10.1002/csc2.20159
- Informing National Food and Water Security Policy through Water Footprint Assessment: the Case of Iran F. Karandish & A. Hoekstra 10.3390/w9110831
- Groundwater saving and quality improvement by reducing water footprints of crops to benchmarks levels F. Karandish et al. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.09.011
- Low-Carbon Urban Water Systems: Opportunities beyond Water and Wastewater Utilities? K. Lam & J. van der Hoek 10.1021/acs.est.0c05385
- Water scarcity alleviation through water footprint reduction in agriculture: The effect of soil mulching and drip irrigation H. Nouri et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.311
- Adaptive Agricultural Strategies for Facing Water Deficit in Sweet Maize Production: A Case Study of a Semi-Arid Mediterranean Region L. Piscitelli et al. 10.3390/w13223285
- Water productivity in meat and milk production in the US from 1960 to 2016 M. Mekonnen et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105084
- A Knowledge Brokering Framework for Integrated Landscape Management D. McGonigle et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00013
- Marginal Abatement Cost Curves for Water Scarcity Mitigation under Uncertainty K. Sjöstrand et al. 10.1007/s11269-019-02376-8
- Optimal Irrigation Strategy using Economic Model Predictive Control L. Balbis 10.25046/aj050693
- Volume versus value of crop-related water footprints and virtual water flows: A case study for the Yellow River Basin L. Zhuo et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127674
- On-farm reduced irrigation and fertilizer doses, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation improve water productivity in tomato production C. Biel et al. 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110337
- Water productivity benchmarks: The case of maize and soybean in Nebraska M. Mekonnen et al. 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106122
- Agricultural water-saving potentials with water footprint benchmarking under different tillage practices for crop production in an irrigation district J. Gao et al. 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108274
- Water and Land Footprints and Economic Productivity as Factors in Local Crop Choice: The Case of Silk in Malawi R. Hogeboom & A. Hoekstra 10.3390/w9100802
- Unit TSP Abatement Costs of Building Modernization as a Tool of Air Quality Management: Krakow Case Study T. Stypka et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/20198600023
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Understanding agricultural water footprint variability to improve water management in Chile V. Novoa et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.127
- Financial Feasibility of Water Conservation in Agriculture C. Siderius et al. 10.1029/2020EF001726
- Applying grey water footprint assessment to achieve environmental sustainability within a nation under intensive agriculture: a high-resolution assessment for common agrochemicals and crops F. Karandish 10.1007/s12665-019-8199-y
- The Water Footprint Concept and Water's Grand Environmental Challenges R. Hogeboom 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.010
- Sustainable water use through multiple cropping systems and precision irrigation A. Brar et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130117
- Socioeconomic benefits of conserving Iran’s water resources through modifying agricultural practices and water management strategies F. Karandish 10.1007/s13280-021-01534-w
- Water Allocation and Integrative Management of Precision Irrigation: A Systematic Review Z. Liang et al. 10.3390/w12113135
- Dietary recommendations in Spain –affordability and environmental sustainability? S. González-García et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120125
- Dynamic assessment of the impacts of global warming on nitrate losses from a subsurface-drained rainfed-canola field F. Haghnazari et al. 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106420
- Trade‐off between nutritive value improvement and crop water use for an alfalfa–grass system M. Dhakal et al. 10.1002/csc2.20159
- Informing National Food and Water Security Policy through Water Footprint Assessment: the Case of Iran F. Karandish & A. Hoekstra 10.3390/w9110831
- Groundwater saving and quality improvement by reducing water footprints of crops to benchmarks levels F. Karandish et al. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.09.011
- Low-Carbon Urban Water Systems: Opportunities beyond Water and Wastewater Utilities? K. Lam & J. van der Hoek 10.1021/acs.est.0c05385
- Water scarcity alleviation through water footprint reduction in agriculture: The effect of soil mulching and drip irrigation H. Nouri et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.311
- Adaptive Agricultural Strategies for Facing Water Deficit in Sweet Maize Production: A Case Study of a Semi-Arid Mediterranean Region L. Piscitelli et al. 10.3390/w13223285
- Water productivity in meat and milk production in the US from 1960 to 2016 M. Mekonnen et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105084
- A Knowledge Brokering Framework for Integrated Landscape Management D. McGonigle et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00013
- Marginal Abatement Cost Curves for Water Scarcity Mitigation under Uncertainty K. Sjöstrand et al. 10.1007/s11269-019-02376-8
- Optimal Irrigation Strategy using Economic Model Predictive Control L. Balbis 10.25046/aj050693
- Volume versus value of crop-related water footprints and virtual water flows: A case study for the Yellow River Basin L. Zhuo et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127674
- On-farm reduced irrigation and fertilizer doses, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation improve water productivity in tomato production C. Biel et al. 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110337
- Water productivity benchmarks: The case of maize and soybean in Nebraska M. Mekonnen et al. 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106122
- Agricultural water-saving potentials with water footprint benchmarking under different tillage practices for crop production in an irrigation district J. Gao et al. 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108274
- Water and Land Footprints and Economic Productivity as Factors in Local Crop Choice: The Case of Silk in Malawi R. Hogeboom & A. Hoekstra 10.3390/w9100802
- Unit TSP Abatement Costs of Building Modernization as a Tool of Air Quality Management: Krakow Case Study T. Stypka et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/20198600023
Latest update: 04 Dec 2023
Short summary
In the current study, we have developed a method to obtain marginal cost curves (MCCs) for WF reduction in crop production. The method is innovative by employing a model that combines soil water balance accounting and a crop growth model and assessing costs and WF reduction for all combinations of irrigation techniques, irrigation strategies and mulching practices. While this approach has been used in the field of constructing MCCs for carbon footprint reduction, this has never been done before.
In the current study, we have developed a method to obtain marginal cost curves (MCCs) for WF...
