18 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A novel semi-numerical infiltration model combining conceptual and physically based approaches F. Stanić et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132664
2. An elastoplastic model with egg-shaped yield surface for coastal soft clay L. Ju et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2024.103975
3. A mass-conservative predictor-corrector solution to the 1D Richards equation with adaptive time control Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125809
4. Numerical modeling of one-dimensional variably saturated flow in a homogeneous and layered soil–water system via mixed form Richards equation with Picard iterative scheme S. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01588-z
5. An advanced discrete fracture model for variably saturated flow in fractured porous media B. Koohbor et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103602
6. Efficient mass conservative numerical model for solving variably saturated groundwater flow A. Aharmouch & B. Amaziane https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126976
7. Multistep optimization of HyPix model for flexible vertical scaling of soil hydraulic parameters J. Pollacco et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105472
8. Review of numerical solution of Richardson–Richards equation for variably saturated flow in soils Y. Zha et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1364
9. A thermodynamics-based coupled model for multi-phase flowback in deformable dual-porosity shale gas reservoirs K. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132187
10. A comparison of numerical schemes for the GPU-accelerated simulation of variably-saturated groundwater flow Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105900
11. A Fully Coupled Hydro-Mechanical-Gas Model Based on Mixture Coupling Theory S. Abdullah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-022-01784-6
12. A finite element method using a bounded auxiliary variable for solving the Richards equation A. Benfanich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2026.115127
13. Sensitivity of meteorological-forcing resolution on hydrologic variables F. Maina et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3451-2020
14. Switching the Richards’ equation for modeling soil water movement under unfavorable conditions J. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.069
15. A Reduced-Order Algorithm for a Digital Twin Model of Ultra-High-Voltage Valve-Side Bushing Considering Spatio-Temporal Non-Uniformity Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18061481
16. Mathematical Analysis of a Subsurface Flow Model S. Al Nazer et al. https://doi.org/10.1137/22M1542076
17. HyPix: 1D physically based hydrological model with novel adaptive time-stepping management and smoothing dynamic criterion for controlling Newton–Raphson step J. Pollacco et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105386
18. Numerical Solvers for the Richards Equation: A Comparative Review of Stability, Efficiency and Mass Conservation A. Chatzikamaris et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7090467