Articles | Volume 21, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2163-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2163-2017
Research article
 | 
20 Apr 2017
Research article |  | 20 Apr 2017

Inter-comparison of daily precipitation products for large-scale hydro-climatic applications over Canada

Jefferson S. Wong, Saman Razavi, Barrie R. Bonsal, Howard S. Wheater, and Zilefac E. Asong

Viewed

Total article views: 4,751 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,833 1,759 159 4,751 458 110 139
  • HTML: 2,833
  • PDF: 1,759
  • XML: 159
  • Total: 4,751
  • Supplement: 458
  • BibTeX: 110
  • EndNote: 139
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Oct 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Oct 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,751 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,610 with geography defined and 141 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 22 Feb 2025
Download
Short summary
This study was conducted to quantify the spatial and temporal variability of the errors associated with various gridded precipitation products in Canada. Overall, WFDEI [GPCC] and CaPA performed best with respect to different performance measures, followed by ANUSPLIN and WEDEI [CRU]. Princeton and NARR demonstrated the lowest quality. Comparing the climate model-simulated products, PCIC ensembles generally performed better than NA-CORDEX ensembles in terms of reliability in four seasons.
Share