Articles | Volume 21, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2163-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2163-2017
Research article
 | 
20 Apr 2017
Research article |  | 20 Apr 2017

Inter-comparison of daily precipitation products for large-scale hydro-climatic applications over Canada

Jefferson S. Wong, Saman Razavi, Barrie R. Bonsal, Howard S. Wheater, and Zilefac E. Asong

Viewed

Total article views: 3,959 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,518 1,311 130 3,959 412 90 117
  • HTML: 2,518
  • PDF: 1,311
  • XML: 130
  • Total: 3,959
  • Supplement: 412
  • BibTeX: 90
  • EndNote: 117
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Oct 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Oct 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,959 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,824 with geography defined and 135 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 18 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
This study was conducted to quantify the spatial and temporal variability of the errors associated with various gridded precipitation products in Canada. Overall, WFDEI [GPCC] and CaPA performed best with respect to different performance measures, followed by ANUSPLIN and WEDEI [CRU]. Princeton and NARR demonstrated the lowest quality. Comparing the climate model-simulated products, PCIC ensembles generally performed better than NA-CORDEX ensembles in terms of reliability in four seasons.