Articles | Volume 20, issue 7
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2589–2609, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2589-2016

Special issue: HYPER Droughts (HYdrological Precipitation – Evaporation...

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2589–2609, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2589-2016
Research article
04 Jul 2016
Research article | 04 Jul 2016

A quantitative analysis to objectively appraise drought indicators and model drought impacts

S. Bachmair et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 3,961 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,131 1,711 119 3,961 72 87
  • HTML: 2,131
  • PDF: 1,711
  • XML: 119
  • Total: 3,961
  • BibTeX: 72
  • EndNote: 87
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Sep 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Sep 2015)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 03 Jul 2022
Download
Short summary
To date, there is little empirical evidence as to which indicator best represents drought impact occurrence for any given region and/or sector. We therefore exploited text-based data from the European Drought Impact report Inventory (EDII) to evaluate drought indicators, empirically determine indicator thresholds, and model drought impacts. A quantitative analysis using Germany and the UK as a testbed proved to be a useful tool for objectively appraising drought indicators.