I have received three reviews of the manuscript and one interactive comment. The first Referee (Dr. Gusev) provided no substantial comments on the paper. Both in the second review (by Prof. Zeiliguer) and in the interactive comment (by Dr. Thodsen) some minor revisions were suggested, which were properly addressed by the authors in their responses. The third anonymous Referee provided extensive comments and recommended re-considering the manuscript after major revisions. I generally agree with the major criticism of the 3rd Referee and offer the authors re-submitting the revised version of the manuscript for additional review.

Alexander Gelfan,
HESS Editor

The revised version of the manuscript has been submitted in the improper form: all references to publications, equations, figures are missing in the text, the reference list is absent, etc..
The manuscript should be re-submitted for final Editor's decision

I appreciate and thank the authors for their clear and concise response to feedback from all reviewers. The authors’ responses were thoughtful and thorough. I find that the revised version of the manuscript is satisfactory addresses the reviewer comments and is acceptable for publication in HESS.

Alexander Gelfan
HESS Editor