45 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Reply to Comment on “HydrogeoSieveXL: an Excel-based tool to estimate hydraulic conductivity from grain-size analysis”: technical note published in Hydrogeology Journal (2015) 23: 837–844, by J. F. Devlin J. Devlin 10.1007/s10040-016-1510-z
2. Relating estuarine geology to groundwater discharge at an oyster reef in Copano Bay, TX N. Spalt et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.048
3. Novel formulation of Slichter’s model for permeability determination in unconsolidated materials: a critical review through field data K. Urumović et al. 10.1080/02626667.2024.2379051
4. Sampling pore water at a centimeter resolution in sandy permeable sediments of lakes, streams, and coastal zones P. Anschutz & C. Charbonnier 10.1002/lom3.10408
5. Comment on “HydrogeoSieveXL: an Excel-based tool to estimate hydraulic conductivity from grain-size analysis”: technical note published in Hydrogeology Journal (2015) 23: 837–844, by J. F. Devlin K. Urumović & K. Urumović 10.1007/s10040-016-1509-5
6. Hydrogeophysical Inversion of Time‐Lapse ERT Data to Determine Hillslope Subsurface Hydraulic Properties M. Pleasants et al. 10.1029/2021WR031073
7. Comment on ‘Reply to Comment on “HydrogeoSieveXL: an Excel-based tool to estimate hydraulic conductivity from grain-size analysis”: technical note published in Hydrogeology Journal (2015) 23: 837–844, by J. F. Devlin’: article published in Hydrogeology Journal (2017) 25: 593–596, by J. F. Devlin K. Urumović & K. Urumović 10.1007/s10040-017-1704-z
8. Prediction of tortuosity, permeability, and pore radius of water-saturated unconsolidated glass beads and sands M. Kimura 10.1121/1.5039520
9. Hydrodynamics of Rectangular Broad-Crested Porous Weirs A. Safarzadeh & S. Mohajeri 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001338
10. Physical Parameters of Arterial Thrombus as a Porous Medium E. Bershadsky & D. Nechipurenko 10.1134/S0006350924700155
11. RESEARCH ON DATA INVERSION PROCESS OF GAS PRESSURE-OSCILLATION METHOD FOR LOW-PERMEABILITY TESTING IN POROUS MEDIA W. Wang et al. 10.1615/JPorMedia.2024052329
12. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Evaluation of Grain Size–Based Porosity Models for Solute Transport through Porous Medium C. Thakur et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000660
13. Reply to Comment on ‘Reply to Comment on “HydrogeoSieveXL: an Excel-based tool to estimate hydraulic conductivity from grain-size analysis”: technical note published in Hydrogeology Journal (2015) 23: 837–844, by J. F. Devlin’: article published in Hydrogeology Journal (2017) 25: 593–596, by J. F. Devlin J. Devlin 10.1007/s10040-017-1705-y
14. Validity range and reliability of the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) method in hydrogeological investigations K. Urumović et al. 10.1007/s10040-019-02080-2
15. Determining concrete properties for different optimized combined concrete mixtures: Novel mathematical approach S. Sebsadji 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117756
16. On the Influence of Grain Size Compared with Other Internal Factors Affecting the Permeability of Granular Porous Media: Redefining the Permeability Units J. Díaz-Curiel et al. 10.2113/2024/lithosphere_2023_231
17. Modelling effects of root growth and decay on soil water retention and permeability J. Ni et al. 10.1139/cgj-2018-0402
18. Influence of ambient temperature on erosion properties of exposed cohesive sediment from an intertidal mudflat H. Nguyen et al. 10.1007/s00367-019-00579-x
19. A New Modified Model of the Streaming Potential Coupling Coefficient Depends on Structural Parameters of Soil-Rock Mixture X. Zhang et al. 10.1155/2021/2619491
20. Suitability evaluation of measurement method for radon exhalation rate of porous medium containing radon adsorbing materials H. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137863
21. Improved model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of soils based on the Kozeny–Carman equation M. Wang et al. 10.2166/nh.2021.268
22. Geological factors and mechanism of sinkhole development in Cho Don zinc-lead mining area, Bac Kan province, North of Vietnam N. Hoang et al. 10.2205/2022ES000728
23. Physical Parameters of Arterial Thrombus as a Porous Medium E. Bershadsky & D. Nechipurenko 10.31857/S0006302924010157
24. Experiment and Model Investigation on the Permeability Evolution of Granite under Triaxial Compressive Damage Z. Ji et al. 10.1155/2022/8895091
25. A Comparison and Validation of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Models K. Gootman et al. 10.3390/w12072040
26. Hydraulic Tomography Estimates Improved by Zonal Information From the Clustering of Geophysical Survey Data C. Wang & W. Illman 10.1029/2023WR035191
27. Bulk density optimization to determine subsurface hydraulic properties in Rocky Mountain catchments using the GEOtop model A. Fullhart et al. 10.1002/hyp.13471
28. Quantifying the hydraulic properties of fractured rock masses along a borehole using composite geological indices: A case study in the mid and upper Choshui River Basin in Central Taiwan S. Hsu 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105924
29. A proposed capillary number dependent model for prediction of relative permeability in gas condensate reservoirs: a robust non-linear regression analysis M. Mahdaviara & A. Helalizadeh 10.2516/ogst/2020017
30. A hybrid resolved CFD-DEM study on internal erosion in gap-graded soils considering coarse particle shape G. Hu et al. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107204
31. Constraining the recharge area of a hydrothermal system in fractured carbonates by numerical modelling S. Borović et al. 10.1016/j.geothermics.2019.05.017
32. A Comparison of Tools and Methods for Estimating Groundwater‐Surface Water Exchange M. Cremeans et al. 10.1111/gwmr.12362
33. On Mapping Local Foam Mobility in Porous Media from Computed Tomography Data G. Chapiro et al. 10.2118/223115-PA
34. Water Flow Modeling with Dry Bulk Density Optimization to Determine Hydraulic Properties in Mountain Soils A. Fullhart et al. 10.2136/sssaj2017.06.0196
35. Revisiting the methods for gas permeability measurement in tight porous medium D. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.012
36. Assessing The Influence of Internal and Viscous Friction on Dispersion and Sound Attenuation in Unconsolidated Marine Sediments V. Lisyutin & O. Lastovenko 10.1134/S1063771020040065
37. Depth-dependent relation between hydraulic conductivity and electrical resistivity in geologic formations K. Li et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124081
38. Particle and bulk media characteristics of food waste compost-based biomedia by dynamic high-temperature aerobic composting process C. Ahn et al. 10.1016/j.eti.2024.103711
39. Using the Effective Void Ratio and Specific Surface Area in the Kozeny–Carman Equation to Predict the Hydraulic Conductivity of Loess B. Hong et al. 10.3390/w12010024
40. A new method to determine the segmentation of pore structure and permeability prediction of loess based on fractal analysis T. Lu et al. 10.1007/s10064-022-03016-z
41. Groundwater well fields in ice-margin valley aquifers - is it easy to protect them, or not? An overview of hydrogeological and legal aspects of determining wellhead protection zones M. Matusiak et al. 10.14746/logos.2024.30.3.18
42. Comparison of saturated hydraulic conductivity estimated by surface NMR and empirical equations U. Singh & P. Sharma 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128929
43. Comparison of seven water retention functions used for modelling soil hydraulic conductivity due to film flow K. Liao et al. 10.1111/sum.12425
44. Applications of critical path analysis to uniform grain packings with narrow conductance distributions: I. Single-phase permeability B. Ghanbarian 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103529
45. A Comparison of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat) Estimations from Pedotransfer Functions (PTFs) and Field Observations in Riparian Seasonal Wetlands B. Abesh & J. Hubbart 10.3390/w15152711