Articles | Volume 19, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3891-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3891-2015
Research article
 | 
16 Sep 2015
Research article |  | 16 Sep 2015

Climate model uncertainty versus conceptual geological uncertainty in hydrological modeling

T. O. Sonnenborg, D. Seifert, and J. C. Refsgaard

Viewed

Total article views: 3,014 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,596 1,301 117 3,014 105 122
  • HTML: 1,596
  • PDF: 1,301
  • XML: 117
  • Total: 3,014
  • BibTeX: 105
  • EndNote: 122
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Apr 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Apr 2015)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
The impacts of climate model uncertainty and geological model uncertainty on hydraulic head, stream flow, travel time and capture zones are evaluated. Six versions of a physically based and distributed hydrological model, each containing a unique interpretation of the geological structure of the model area, are forced by 11 climate model projections. Geology is the dominating uncertainty source for travel time and capture zones, while climate dominates for hydraulic heads and steam flow.