29 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. 3D hydrostratigraphic architecture of a Late Pleistocene buried valley infill at Kurikka, west-central Finland A. Åberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2025.110080
2. Regional flow in a complex coastal aquifer system: Combining voxel geological modelling with regularized calibration R. Meyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.020
3. Perspectives on constructing and generalizing groundwater database Y. SAKATA et al. https://doi.org/10.5917/jagh.67.7
4. Water Table Uncertainties due to Uncertainties in Structure and Properties of an Unconfined Aquifer J. Hauser et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12577
5. Multiple-point statistical modeling of three-dimensional glacial aquifer heterogeneity for improved groundwater management N. Kawo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02658-x
6. Computational electromagnetic geophysics for groundwater system studies: A review of established practices and recent advances P. Rulff et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135542
7. A geomagnetic analysis for lineament detection and lithologic characterization impacting groundwater prospecting; a case study of Buffalo catchment, Eastern Cape, South Africa S. Owolabi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100531
8. Combining Hydraulic Head Analysis with Airborne Electromagnetics to Detect and Map Impermeable Aquifer Boundaries J. Korus https://doi.org/10.3390/w10080975
9. Combining Clustering Methods With MPS to Estimate Structural Uncertainty for Hydrological Models T. Vilhelmsen et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00181
10. Hydrogeophysical inversion using a physics-based catchment model with hydrological and electromagnetic induction data M. Pleasants et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132376
11. Time-Domain Airborne Electromagnetic Inversion with Gradient Guidance and Structural Enhancement D. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26165099
12. Probabilistic predictions using a groundwater model informed with airborne EM data P. Marker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.03.002
13. Remote sensing and hydrogeophysics give a new impetus to integrated hydrological models: A review M. Lubczynski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130901
14. Detecting and modelling structures on the micro and the macro scales: Assessing their effects on solute transport behaviour C. Haslauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.05.007
15. Using geophysical data to assess groundwater levels and the accuracy of a regional numerical flow model Y. Lévesque et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02591-z
16. Voxel inversion of airborne electromagnetic data for improved groundwater model construction and prediction accuracy N. Christensen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1321-2017
17. Mapping Aquifer Systems with Airborne Electromagnetics in the Central Valley of California R. Knight et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12656
18. Constraining regional-scale groundwater transport predictions with multiple geophysical techniques C. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100841
19. Benefits of an Airborne Electromagnetic Survey of Former Opencast Lignite Mining Areas in Lusatia, Germany B. Siemon et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17071000
20. High-resolution paleovalley classification from airborne electromagnetic imaging and deep neural network training using digital elevation model data Z. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2561-2019
21. A model of transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity from electrical resistivity distribution derived from airborne electromagnetic surveys of the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer, Midwest USA S. Ikard et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02590-6
22. Generation of 3‐D hydrostratigraphic zones from dense airborne electromagnetic data to assess groundwater model prediction error N. Christensen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019141
23. Assessing groundwater denitrification spatially is the key to targeted agricultural nitrogen regulation B. Hansen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55984-9
24. Testing alternative uses of electromagnetic data to reduce the prediction error of groundwater models N. Christensen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1925-2016
25. Hydrofacies simulation based on transition probability geostatistics using electrical resistivity tomography and borehole data L. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02539-9
26. Calibration of a 3D regional groundwater model using geophysics-derived groundwater levels Y. Lévesque et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-026-03144-w
27. Electrical Resistivity Imaging and the Saline Water Interface in High-Quality Coastal Aquifers A. Costall et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9468-0
28. Quantifying model structural uncertainty using airborne electromagnetic data B. Minsley et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa393
29. Anthropogenic wetlands due to over-irrigation of desert areas: a challenging hydrogeological investigation with extensive geophysical input from TEM and MRS measurements A. Behroozmand et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1527-2017