The authors addressed almost all of the two reviewers' specific comments and most of their general comments in revising the manuscript. They also took a high effort in responding to the general comments in a side letter.
However, the authors did not include some of their reasoning refering to the general comments into the manuscript which would additionally improve it. Thus, I suggest that the authors also integrate their responses to "Why is the paper different from some other in literature" from reviewer 1 and why the topic is of great interest with respect to the WFD from reviewer 2 into the manuscript.