Technical Note: Field experiences using UV/VIS sensors for high-resolution monitoring of nitrate in groundwater

Huebsch, M.; Grimmeisen, F.; Zemann, M.; Fenton, O.; Richards, K. G.; Jordan, P.; Sawarieh, A.; Blum, P.; Goldscheider, N.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1589-2015

Articles | Volume 19, issue 4

https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1589-2015

© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue:

High resolution monitoring strategies for nutrients in groundwater...

https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1589-2015

© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 19, issue 4

Technical note

|

02 Apr 2015

Technical note |

| 02 Apr 2015

Technical Note: Field experiences using UV/VIS sensors for high-resolution monitoring of nitrate in groundwater

M. Huebsch, F. Grimmeisen, M. Zemann, O. Fenton, K. G. Richards, P. Jordan, A. Sawarieh, P. Blum, and N. Goldscheider

Download

Final revised paper (published on 02 Apr 2015)
Preprint (discussion started on 04 Nov 2014)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC C5376: 'Review of Huebsch et al: Technical Note, Field experiences using UV/VIS sensors for high resolution monitoring of nitrate in groundwater', Joachim Rozemeijer, 30 Nov 2014
- AC C6408: 'Reply to Referee #1', Manuela Hübsch, 07 Feb 2015
RC C5781: 'Review of the technical note: Field experiences using UV/VIS sensors for high-resolution monitoring of nitrate in groundwater by Huebsch et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 21 Dec 2014
- AC C6409: 'Reply to Referee #2', Manuela Hübsch, 07 Feb 2015

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (Editor review) (11 Feb 2015) by Frans van Geer

AR by Manuela Hübsch on behalf of the Authors (21 Feb 2015) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (04 Mar 2015) by Frans van Geer

Short summary

Two different in situ spectrophotometers, which were used in the field to determine highly time resolved nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) concentrations at two distinct spring discharge sites, are compared: a double and a multiple wavelength spectrophotometer. The objective of the study was to review the hardware options, determine ease of calibration, accuracy, influence of additional substances and to assess positive and negative aspects of the two sensors as well as troubleshooting and trade-offs.