41 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. The asymmetric impacts of international agricultural trade on water use scarcity, inequality and inequity W. Gu et al. 10.1038/s44221-024-00224-7
2. Interdependencies and telecoupling of oil palm expansion at the expense of Indonesian rainforest M. Rulli et al. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.050
3. Anthropogenic Nitrogen and Phosphorus Emissions and Related Grey Water Footprints Caused by EU-27′s Crop Production and Consumption M. Mekonnen et al. 10.3390/w8010030
4. Limited water scarcity mitigation by expanded interbasin physical and virtual water diversions with uneven economic value added in China W. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157625
5. Inequality or injustice in water use for food? J. Carr et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/024013
6. The Global Food‐Energy‐Water Nexus P. D'Odorico et al. 10.1029/2017RG000591
7. Global virtual water trade and the hydrological cycle: patterns, drivers, and socio-environmental impacts P. D’Odorico et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab05f4
8. Virtual nitrogen and phosphorus flow associated with interprovincial crop trade and its effect on grey water stress in China D. Ren et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac3604
9. A just world on a safe planet: a Lancet Planetary Health–Earth Commission report on Earth-system boundaries, translations, and transformations J. Gupta et al. 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00042-1
10. Towards improvement of grey water footprint assessment: With an illustration for global maize cultivation W. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.072
11. Worse than imagined: Unidentified virtual water flows in China B. Cai et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.062
12. Biological control of an invasive pest eases pressures on global commodity markets K. Wyckhuys et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aad8f0
13. Trade in the US and Mexico helps reduce environmental costs of agriculture L. Martinez-Melendez & E. Bennett 10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/055004
14. Progress in socio‐hydrology: a meta‐analysis of challenges and opportunities S. Pande & M. Sivapalan 10.1002/wat2.1193
15. Uncovering the structure and evolution of global virtual water and agricultural land network Z. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.spc.2024.08.017
16. Water resources conservation and nitrogen pollution reduction under global food trade and agricultural intensification W. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.306
17. Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems J. Pretty & Z. Bharucha 10.1093/aob/mcu205
18. Reserves and trade jointly determine exposure to food supply shocks P. Marchand et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095009
19. Savings and losses of global water resources in food‐related virtual water trade W. Liu et al. 10.1002/wat2.1320
20. Food, trade, and the environment D. Seekell et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aae065
21. Snowmelt risk telecouplings for irrigated agriculture Y. Qin et al. 10.1038/s41558-022-01509-z
22. Spatial analysis of dual-scale water stresses based on water footprint accounting in the Haihe River Basin, China C. Li et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.046
23. Effect of virtual water trade on freshwater pollution in trading partners: a systematic literature review P. Teymouri & R. Dehghanzadeh 10.1007/s11356-021-16434-5
24. Moving sociohydrology forward: a synthesis across studies T. Troy et al. 10.5194/hess-19-3667-2015
25. Global impacts of the meat trade on in-stream organic river pollution: the importance of spatially distributed hydrological conditions Y. Wen et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aa94f6
26. Indian interstate trade exacerbates nutrient pollution in food production hubs S. Goyal et al. 10.1038/s43247-023-01178-6
27. Applying grey water footprint assessment to achieve environmental sustainability within a nation under intensive agriculture: a high-resolution assessment for common agrochemicals and crops F. Karandish 10.1007/s12665-019-8199-y
28. What commodities and countries impact inequality in the global food system? J. Carr et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095013
29. Grey water footprint and interprovincial virtual grey water transfers for China's final electricity demands X. Liao et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.179
30. A Market-Based Economic Instrument to Better Use Water in Agriculture O. Brînzan et al. 10.3390/su12041473
31. Local nutrient regimes determine site-specific environmental triggers of cyanobacterial and microcystin variability in urban lakes S. Sinang et al. 10.5194/hess-19-2179-2015
32. A Data Driven Network Approach to Rank Countries Production Diversity and Food Specialization C. Tu et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0165941
33. Temporal and spatial evolution of global major grain trade patterns Z. Yin et al. 10.1016/j.jia.2023.10.032
34. Appropriation pathways of water grabbing P. D'Odorico et al. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106650
35. Influences of the south–to-north water diversion project and virtual water flows on regional water resources considering both water quantity and quality J. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118920
36. Water quality: the missing dimension of water in the water–energy–food nexus K. Heal et al. 10.1080/02626667.2020.1859114
37. Global Gray Water Footprint and Water Pollution Levels Related to Anthropogenic Nitrogen Loads to Fresh Water M. Mekonnen & A. Hoekstra 10.1021/acs.est.5b03191
38. Industrial environmental efficiency, foreign direct investment and export ——Evidence from 30 provinces in China X. Yang & C. Li 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.156
39. Environmental impacts of food trade via resource use and greenhouse gas emissions C. Dalin & I. Rodríguez-Iturbe 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/035012
40. Rethinking Agricultural Trade Relationships in an Era of Globalization G. MacDonald et al. 10.1093/biosci/biu225
41. Trends in global virtual land trade in relation to agricultural products W. Qiang et al. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104439