42 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. An Integrated Decision Support Framework for Incorporating Fairness and Stability Concerns into River Water Allocation J. Qin et al. 10.1007/s11269-019-02439-w
2. Sharing water and benefits in transboundary river basins D. Arjoon et al. 10.5194/hess-20-2135-2016
3. Allocating Water under Bankruptcy Scenario D. Degefu & W. He 10.1007/s11269-016-1403-x
4. Water Allocation in Transboundary River Basins under Water Scarcity: a Cooperative Bargaining Approach D. Degefu et al. 10.1007/s11269-016-1431-6
5. Water Resources Allocation in Transboundary River Based on Asymmetric Nash–Harsanyi Leader–Follower Game Model J. Fu et al. 10.3390/w10030270
6. Transboundary water allocation in critical scarcity conditions: a stochastic bankruptcy approach S. Janjua & I. Hassan 10.2166/aqua.2020.014
7. The improved bankruptcy method and its application in regional water resource allocation S. Li et al. 10.1016/j.jher.2018.07.003
8. The water-energy-food nexus: A holistic approach for resource security in Iran, Iraq, and Turkey M. Zarei 10.1016/j.wen.2020.05.004
9. Inter-basin hydropolitics for optimal water resources allocation M. Kazemi et al. 10.1007/s10661-020-08439-3
10. Real-time water allocation policies calculated with bankruptcy games and genetic programing O. Bozorg-Haddad et al. 10.2166/ws.2017.102
11. Application of probabilistic bankruptcy method in river water quality management S. Farjoudi et al. 10.1007/s13762-020-03046-8
12. Developing new scenarios for water allocation negotiations: a case study of the Euphrates River Basin M. Jarkeh et al. 10.5194/piahs-374-9-2016
13. A fuzzy multi-stakeholder socio-optimal model for water and waste load allocation M. Ghorbani Mooselu et al. 10.1007/s10661-019-7504-2
14. Weighted Bankruptcy Rules and Transboundary Water Resources Allocation H. Mianabadi et al. 10.1007/s11269-015-0942-x
15. Transboundary water allocation under water scarce and uncertain conditions: a stochastic bankruptcy approach D. Degefu et al. 10.2166/wp.2016.031
16. The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region J. Rightnar & A. Dinar 10.1007/s11269-020-02552-1
17. Benefit Sharing on Transboundary Rivers: Case Study and Theoretical Exploration Z. Changchun et al. 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2019.01.001
18. Seeking a strategic cross boundary solution to the Indus Water basin sharing decisions S. Ahmed et al. 10.1002/pa.2367
19. Determination of the Optimal River Basin-Wide Agricultural Water Demand Quantities Meeting Satisfactory Reliability Levels K. Fadaeizadeh & M. Shourian 10.1007/s11269-019-02242-7
20. Sequential bankruptcy problems A. Estévez-Fernández et al. 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.038
21. A conflict resolution method for waste load reallocation in river systems K. Aghasian et al. 10.1007/s13762-018-1993-3
22. Use of bankruptcy methods for resolving interprovincial water conflicts over transboundary river: Case study of Indus River in Pakistan S. Janjua & I. Hassan 10.1002/rra.3621
23. Multi-Objective Optimal Allocation of Urban Water Resources While Considering Conflict Resolution Based on the PSO Algorithm: A Case Study of Kunming, China J. Chen et al. 10.3390/su12041337
24. Iran’s Socio-economic Drought: Challenges of a Water-Bankrupt Nation K. Madani et al. 10.1080/00210862.2016.1259286
25. Monotonic Bargaining Solution for Allocating Critically Scarce Transboundary Water D. Degefu et al. 10.1007/s11269-017-1648-z
26. Assessment of potential of intraregional conflicts by developing a transferability index for inter-basin water transfers, and their impacts on the water resources O. Bozorg-Haddad et al. 10.1007/s10661-019-8011-1
27. Water Allocation Using the Bankruptcy Model: A Case Study of the Missouri River H. Wickramage et al. 10.3390/w12030619
28. Asymmetric Bargaining Model for Water Resource Allocation over Transboundary Rivers J. Qin et al. 10.3390/ijerph16101733
29. Socio-Hydrology: A New Understanding to Unite or a New Science to Divide? K. Madani & M. Shafiee-Jood 10.3390/w12071941
30. Application of the Bankruptcy Theory and Conflicting Claims on Water Resources Allocation of Zayanderud S. Jalili Kamju & R. Khochiani 10.29252/jemr.10.39.45
31. A novel CVaR-based conflict resolution model for optimal allocation of treated wastewater under bankruptcy conditions S. Tayebikhorami et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119766
32. A game theory–reinforcement learning (GT–RL) method to develop optimal operation policies for multi-operator reservoir systems K. Madani & M. Hooshyar 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.061
33. Water Resource Optimal Allocation Based on Multi-Agent Game Theory of HanJiang River Basin Q. Han et al. 10.3390/w10091184
34. A bankruptcy method for pollution load reallocation in river systems A. Moridi 10.2166/hydro.2018.156
35. Equilibrium strategy based waste load allocation using simulated annealing optimization algorithm M. Saadatpour et al. 10.1007/s10661-020-08567-w
36. Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis? K. Madani 10.1007/s13412-014-0182-z
37. Optimal Crop Water Allocation in Case of Drought Occurrence, Imposing Deficit Irrigation with Proportional Cutback Constraint M. Homayounfar et al. 10.1007/s11269-014-0669-0
38. A new framework for resolving conflicts over transboundary rivers using bankruptcy methods K. Madani et al. 10.5194/hess-18-3055-2014
39. Irrigation water management in Iran: Implications for water use efficiency improvement B. Nazari et al. 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.06.003
40. Use of bankruptcy methods for resolving interprovincial water conflicts over transboundary river: Case study of Indus River in Pakistan S. Janjua & I. Hassan 10.1002/rra.3621
41. Application of the Bankruptcy Theory and Conflicting Claims on Water Resources Allocation of Zayanderud S. Jalili Kamju & R. Khochiani 10.29252/jemr.10.39.45
42. A new bankruptcy method for conflict resolution in water resources allocation H. Mianabadi et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.018