70 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Sharing water and benefits in transboundary river basins D. Arjoon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2135-2016
2. Allocating Water under Bankruptcy Scenario D. Degefu & W. He https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1403-x
3. Koordynacja działań zbiorowych i metody sprawiedliwego podziału w sektorze publicznym E. Kiryluk-Dryjska https://doi.org/10.53098/wir012023/04
4. Water conflict analysis in a changing context: A qualitative systematic review of trends, patterns, and approaches in Iran M. Jafari et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wwp2.12212
5. Transboundary water allocation in critical scarcity conditions: a stochastic bankruptcy approach S. Janjua & I. Hassan https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2020.014
6. Managing basin-wide ecosystem services using the bankruptcy theory S. Ashrafi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156845
7. An Asymmetric Bargaining Model for Natural-Gas Distribution S. Janjua et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115677
8. Inter-basin hydropolitics for optimal water resources allocation M. Kazemi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08439-3
9. Optimized Modeling of Pollution Load Allocation in a Mountainous River of Semiarid Basin Based on Bankruptcy Rules: A Case Study of the Abbas-Abad River, Iran O. Babamiri et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6891
10. Real-time water allocation policies calculated with bankruptcy games and genetic programing O. Bozorg-Haddad et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2017.102
11. Reallocating Shared Groundwater Resources Using a Participatory Two- level Weighted Bankruptcy Framework M. Virani et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-04078-2
12. Development of multidimensional water poverty in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China L. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116608
13. A fuzzy multi-stakeholder socio-optimal model for water and waste load allocation M. Ghorbani Mooselu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7504-2
14. A multi-weight fuzzy Methodological Framework for Allocating Coalition Payoffs of Joint Water Environment Governance in Transboundary River Basins L. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03206-0
15. Weighted Bankruptcy Rules and Transboundary Water Resources Allocation H. Mianabadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0942-x
16. Transboundary water allocation under water scarce and uncertain conditions: a stochastic bankruptcy approach D. Degefu et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2016.031
17. The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region J. Rightnar & A. Dinar https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02552-1
18. Water Allocation Management Under Scarcity: a Bankruptcy Approach Y. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03098-0
19. Developing a Bankruptcy Theory to Resolve Stakeholders’ Conflict over Optimal Water Allocation: The Case of Hirmand Catchment A. Shahraki et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16091303
20. Comparison of bankruptcy methods in the operation management of the Karkheh River Basin to allocate more water to the Hawr-Al-Azim Wetland N. Pournabi et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2022.126
21. River water quality management using an integrated multi-objective optimization-simulation approach based on bankruptcy rules O. Babamiri & Y. Dinpashoh https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31603-4
22. Determination of the Optimal River Basin-Wide Agricultural Water Demand Quantities Meeting Satisfactory Reliability Levels K. Fadaeizadeh & M. Shourian https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02242-7
23. Bankruptcy rules and sustainable water management: A MODSIM-NSGAII simulation multi-objective optimization framework for equitable transboundary water allocation B. Asl-Rousta & S. Mousavi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100648
24. Water-food-energy nexus for transboundary cooperation in Eastern Africa H. Elsayed et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.001
25. Use of bankruptcy methods for resolving interprovincial water conflicts over transboundary river: Case study of Indus River in Pakistan S. Janjua & I. Hassan https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3621
26. Optimal Allocation of Water Resources Using Agro-Economic Development and Colony Optimization Algorithm A. Shahraki et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135801
27. Iran’s Socio-economic Drought: Challenges of a Water-Bankrupt Nation K. Madani et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00210862.2016.1259286
28. Monotonic Bargaining Solution for Allocating Critically Scarce Transboundary Water D. Degefu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1648-z
29. Assessment of potential of intraregional conflicts by developing a transferability index for inter-basin water transfers, and their impacts on the water resources O. Bozorg-Haddad et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-8011-1
30. Resolving water security conflicts in agriculture by a cooperative Nash bargaining approach S. Janjua et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109205
31. Water Allocation Using the Bankruptcy Model: A Case Study of the Missouri River H. Wickramage et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030619
32. A new fuzzy approach and bankruptcy theory in risk estimation in Waste Load Allocation A. Nouri et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11811-8
33. Water Bankruptcy: The Formal Definition K. Madani https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-025-04484-0
34. Application of the Bankruptcy Theory and Conflicting Claims on Water Resources Allocation of Zayanderud S. Jalili Kamju & R. Khochiani https://doi.org/10.29252/jemr.10.39.45
35. Socio-hydrological modeling of the tradeoff between flood control and hydropower provided by the Columbia River Treaty A. Shrestha et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4893-2022
36. A game theory–reinforcement learning (GT–RL) method to develop optimal operation policies for multi-operator reservoir systems K. Madani & M. Hooshyar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.061
37. Diagnostic and Evolutionary Models for Spatial Equilibrium Allocation Schemes of Transboundary Water Resources X. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X24400010
38. Allocation of allowable pollution load by using the bankruptcy solution rules A. Ahani & H. Kazerooni https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2021.048
39. Water Resource Optimal Allocation Based on Multi-Agent Game Theory of HanJiang River Basin Q. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091184
40. A bankruptcy method for pollution load reallocation in river systems A. Moridi https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2018.156
41. A Three-stage Cooperative Game Model for Water Resource Allocation Under Scarcity Using Bankruptcy Rules, Nash Bargaining Solution and TOPSIS S. Janjua et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-025-04123-8
42. Optimizing Water Distribution in Dry Regions: Comparative Analysis of Bankruptcy and Nash Bargaining Solutions M. Saleem et al. https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.C578
43. An Integrated Decision Support Framework for Incorporating Fairness and Stability Concerns into River Water Allocation J. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02439-w
44. Water Allocation in Transboundary River Basins under Water Scarcity: a Cooperative Bargaining Approach D. Degefu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1431-6
45. Water Resources Allocation in Transboundary River Based on Asymmetric Nash–Harsanyi Leader–Follower Game Model J. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10030270
46. The improved bankruptcy method and its application in regional water resource allocation S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2018.07.003
47. The water-energy-food nexus: A holistic approach for resource security in Iran, Iraq, and Turkey M. Zarei https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wen.2020.05.004
48. Study on the Unconventional Water Subsidy Policy in the Arid Area of Northwest China C. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193167
49. Managing Trans-Jurisdictional Water Scarcity Conflicts Using a Decision-Making Method Combining Fairness and Stability Concerns J. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18050622
50. Application of probabilistic bankruptcy method in river water quality management S. Farjoudi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-03046-8
51. Developing new scenarios for water allocation negotiations: a case study of the Euphrates River Basin M. Jarkeh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-374-9-2016
52. A decentralized multi-agent framework for adaptive water allocation in river-reservoir systems H. Ghanaei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135903
53. Groundwater sustainability: Developing a non-cooperative optimal management scenario in shared groundwater resources under water bankruptcy conditions M. Yazdian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112807
54. Benefit Sharing on Transboundary Rivers: Case Study and Theoretical Exploration Z. Changchun et al. https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2019.01.001
55. Seeking a strategic cross boundary solution to the Indus Water basin sharing decisions S. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2367
56. Sequential bankruptcy problems A. Estévez-Fernández et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.038
57. Assessment of renewable water in the face of climate change by a comprehensive analysis of adaptation strategies M. Kalantari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-03886-8
58. A conflict resolution method for waste load reallocation in river systems K. Aghasian et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1993-3
59. Optimal water resources allocation in transboundary river basins according to hydropolitical consideration M. Kazemi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01491-0
60. Multi-Objective Optimal Allocation of Urban Water Resources While Considering Conflict Resolution Based on the PSO Algorithm: A Case Study of Kunming, China J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041337
61. Analysis of Water Resources Allocation Based on Grey Relation-Cooperation Game in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101629
62. Assessment of Rural Water Sustainability Indices: A Case Study from Bundelkhand, Madhya Pradesh, India R. Dwivedi et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6871
63. Transboundary Water Allocation under Water Scarcity Based on an Asymmetric Power Index Approach with Bankruptcy Theory J. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16192828
64. A cooperative game model with bankruptcy theory for water allocation: a case study in China Tarim River Basin J. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15748-8
65. Asymmetric Bargaining Model for Water Resource Allocation over Transboundary Rivers J. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101733
66. Socio-Hydrology: A New Understanding to Unite or a New Science to Divide? K. Madani & M. Shafiee-Jood https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071941
67. A novel CVaR-based conflict resolution model for optimal allocation of treated wastewater under bankruptcy conditions S. Tayebikhorami et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119766
68. Optimal Multi-Sectoral Water Resources Allocation Based on Economic Evaluation Considering the Environmental Flow Requirements: A Case Study of Yellow River Basin C. Zhang & T. Oki https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162253
69. A Game-Theoretic Approach for Electric Power Distribution during Power Shortage: A Case Study in Pakistan S. Janjua et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115084
70. Equilibrium strategy based waste load allocation using simulated annealing optimization algorithm M. Saadatpour et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08567-w