98 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Diurnal and Seasonal Mapping of Water Deficit Index and Evapotranspiration by an Unmanned Aerial System: A Case Study for Winter Wheat in Denmark V. Antoniuk et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152998
2. Impact of clouds on the estimation of daily evapotranspiration from MODIS-derived instantaneous evapotranspiration using the constant global shortwave radiation ratio method Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1482025
3. Revisiting Daily MODIS Evapotranspiration Algorithm Using Flux Tower Measurements in China L. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA001818
4. Ensemble machine learning for interpretable soil heat flux estimation J. Cross & D. Drewry https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102697
5. Machine learning approaches for enhanced estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo): a comparative evaluation A. Farag https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-23166-w
6. Effect of Cloud Cover on Temporal Upscaling of Instantaneous Evapotranspiration Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001635
7. Decreased latency in landsat-derived land surface temperature products: A case for near-real-time evapotranspiration estimation in California K. Knipper et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108316
8. Classification of Different Irrigation Systems at Field Scale Using Time-Series of Remote Sensing Data G. Paolini et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3222884
9. Modelling actual evapotranspiration using a two source energy balance model with Sentinel imagery in herbaceous-free and herbaceous-cover Mediterranean olive orchards S. Aguirre-García et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108692
10. Improving time upscaling of instantaneous evapotranspiration based on machine learning models D. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2024.2423431
11. Spatial Disaggregation of Latent Heat Flux Using Contextual Models over India R. Eswar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090949
12. Influence of vineyard row orientation on evapotranspiration estimates from a satellite-based two-source energy balance model D. Salazar-Martínez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109976
13. Decoupling of gross primary productivity and transpiration revealed through a daily remote sensing modelling approach in arid irrigated farmland L. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111085
14. The utility of all-weather land surface temperature for energy balance–based evapotranspiration estimation R. Harod et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-026-01119-z
15. ERTFM: An Effective Model to Fuse Chinese GF-1 and MODIS Reflectance Data for Terrestrial Latent Heat Flux Estimation L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183703
16. Estimation of daily evapotranspiration and irrigation water efficiency at a Landsat-like scale for an arid irrigation area using multi-source remote sensing data Y. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.07.019
17. High-Resolution Monitoring and Assessment of Evapotranspiration and Gross Primary Production Using Remote Sensing in a Typical Arid Region J. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10040396
18. Temporal Upscaling of Agricultural Evapotranspiration with an Improved Evaporative Fraction Method J. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17061016
19. Using high-spatiotemporal thermal satellite ET retrievals to monitor water use over California vineyards of different climate, vine variety and trellis design K. Knipper et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106361
20. Evaluating machine learning and deep learning for upscaling instantaneous latent heat flux to daily scale E. Tunca https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-026-01079-4
21. Effect of the revisit interval and temporal upscaling methods on the accuracy of remotely sensed evapotranspiration estimates J. Alfieri et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-83-2017
22. A drought indicator reflecting ecosystem responses to water availability: The Normalized Ecosystem Drought Index K. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.12.001
23. A Comparison of Different Machine Learning Methods to Reconstruct Daily Evapotranspiration Time Series Estimated by Thermal–Infrared Remote Sensing G. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16030509
24. Influence of modeling domain and meteorological forcing data on daily evapotranspiration estimates from a Shuttleworth–Wallace model using Sentinel-2 surface reflectance data N. Bhattarai et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00768-0
25. Combining Evapotranspiration and Soil Apparent Electrical Conductivity Mapping to Identify Potential Precision Irrigation Benefits M. Nocco et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212460
26. Evaluation of the temporal reconstruction methods for MODIS-based continuous daily actual evapotranspiration estimation X. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107991
27. A Spatial-Temporal Seamless Evapotranspiration Product Based on TSEB-SM Model and DNN-ETo Method Across China G. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2025.3642952
28. The accuracy of temporal upscaling of instantaneous evapotranspiration to daily values with seven upscaling methods Z. Liu https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4417-2021
29. Impact of Insolation Data Source on Remote Sensing Retrievals of Evapotranspiration over the California Delta M. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030216
30. Performance of the SSEBop model in the estimation of the actual evapotranspiration of soybean and bean crops A. Paula et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-3921.pab2019.v54.00739
31. Analysis and forecast of crop water demand in irrigation districts across the eastern part of the Ebro river basin (Catalonia, Spain): estimation of evapotranspiration through copernicus-based inputs J. Bellvert et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-024-00971-1
32. Estimating annual water storage variations in medium-scale (2000–10 000 km2) basins using microwave-based soil moisture retrievals W. Crow et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1849-2017
33. Modeling Evapotranspiration at Larger Temporal Scales: Effects of Temporal Aggregation and Data Gaps K. Athira et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14174142
34. A Review of Current and Potential Applications of Remote Sensing to Study the Water Status of Horticultural Crops D. Gautam & V. Pagay https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010140
35. Interoperability of ECOSTRESS and Landsat for mapping evapotranspiration time series at sub-field scales M. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112189
36. Upscaling evapotranspiration from the instantaneous to the daily time scale: Assessing six methods including an optimized coefficient based on worldwide eddy covariance flux network L. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126135
37. Monitoring daily evapotranspiration over two California vineyards using Landsat 8 in a multi-sensor data fusion approach K. Semmens et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.10.025
38. Remote Sensing of Evapotranspiration over the Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District, USA A. French et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8120278
39. Towards a global actual evapotranspiration product for the Copernicus Land Monitoring Service R. Guzinski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-5593-2026
40. Daily Actual Evapotranspiration Estimation in a Mediterranean Ecosystem from Landsat Observations Using SEBAL Approach H. Awada et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020189
41. Evapotranspiration Characteristics of Different Oases and Effects of Human Activities on Evapotranspiration in Heihe River Basin Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246283
42. Intercomparison of temporal upscaling strategies for daily evapotranspiration estimation from the perspective of land surface temperature Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133461
43. Resolve the Clear‐Sky Continuous Diurnal Cycle of High‐Resolution ECOSTRESS Evapotranspiration and Land Surface Temperature J. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032227
44. Understanding Drainage Dynamics and Irrigation Management in a Semi-Arid Mediterranean Basin V. Altés et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010016
45. Mapping evapotranspiration with high-resolution aircraft imagery over vineyards using one- and two-source modeling schemes T. Xia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1523-2016
46. Comparison of three remote sensing based models for the estimation of latent heat flux over India R. Eswar et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1404067
47. Evapotranspiration estimates derived using thermal-based satellite remote sensing and data fusion for irrigation management in California vineyards K. Knipper et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-018-0591-y
48. A decadal (2008–2017) daily evapotranspiration data set of 1 km spatial resolution and spatial completeness across the North China Plain using TSEB and data fusion C. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112519
49. Accounting for Almond Crop Water Use under Different Irrigation Regimes with a Two-Source Energy Balance Model and Copernicus-Based Inputs C. Jofre-Čekalović et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092106
50. Estimating daily seamless 20-m resolution evapotranspiration using data fusion and TSEB P. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110210
51. Assessing Daily Evapotranspiration Methodologies from One-Time-of-Day sUAS and EC Information in the GRAPEX Project A. Nassar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152887
52. Spatial estimation of actual evapotranspiration over irrigated turfgrass using sUAS thermal and multispectral imagery and TSEB model K. Meza et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00899-y
53. Field scale partitioning of Landsat land surface temperature into soil and canopy components for evapotranspiration assessment using a two-source energy balance model C. Cammalleri et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-024-00976-w
54. Evaluating different metrics from the thermal-based two-source energy balance model for monitoring grapevine water stress H. Nieto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00790-2
55. Temporal upscaling of instantaneous evapotranspiration on clear‐sky days using the constant reference evaporative fraction method with fixed or variable surface resistances at two cropland sites R. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025975
56. Global Surface Net-Radiation at 5 km from MODIS Terra M. Verma et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8090739
57. Assimilation of Sentinel-2 Biophysical Variables into a Digital Twin for the Automated Irrigation Scheduling of a Vineyard J. Bellvert et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15142506
58. High-throughput physiological phenotyping of crop evapotranspiration at the plot scale G. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109507
59. Estimating Evapotranspiration Using Coupled Remote Sensing and Three SEB Models in an Arid Region A. Elkatoury et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-019-00410-w
60. Evaporation estimates using weather station data and boundary layer theory P. Gentine et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070819
61. Improving terrestrial evapotranspiration estimation of the Tibetan Plateau by coupling SEBS with machine learning-derived aerodynamic resistance Y. Kan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133711
62. Impact of the Revisit of Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing Observations on Evapotranspiration Uncertainty—A Sensitivity Study Using AmeriFlux Data P. Guillevic et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11050573
63. Impact of advection on two-source energy balance (TSEB) canopy transpiration parameterization for vineyards in the California Central Valley W. Kustas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00778-y
64. Comparison of evapotranspiration upscaling methods from instantaneous to daytime scale for tea and wheat in southeast China H. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107464
65. Field-Scale Assessment of Land and Water Use Change over the California Delta Using Remote Sensing M. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060889
66. Droughts impede water balance recovery from fires in the Western United States S. Ahmad et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02266-8
67. Recent literature in cartography and geographic information science M. Finn & D. Thunen https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2014.938899
68. Using Remote Sensing to Estimate Scales of Spatial Heterogeneity to Analyze Evapotranspiration Modeling in a Natural Ecosystem A. Nassar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14020372
69. Mapping Daily Evapotranspiration at Field Scale Using the Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 Dataset, with Sharpened VIIRS as a Sentinel-2 Thermal Proxy J. Xue et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173420
70. Robust estimates of soil moisture and latent heat flux coupling strength obtained from triple collocation W. Crow et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065929
71. Multiscale evaluation of three remote sensing-based evapotranspiration models across the humid to arid tropics: a study over India K. Athira et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2025.2541749
72. Assessment of the clumped model to estimate olive orchard evapotranspiration using meteorological data and UAV-based thermal infrared imagery C. Riveros-Burgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-020-00716-w
73. Accurate estimates of land surface energy fluxes and irrigation requirements from UAV-based thermal and multispectral sensors J. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.03.009
74. Two-source energy balance modeling of evapotranspiration in Alpine grasslands M. Castelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.062
75. Remote sensing products for predicting actual evapotranspiration and water stress footprints under different land cover M. Jahangir & M. Arast https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121818
76. Up-scaling the latent heat flux from instantaneous to daily-scale: A comparison of three methods M. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101057
77. Remotely sensed land-surface energy fluxes at sub-field scale in heterogeneous agricultural landscape and coniferous plantation R. Guzinski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-5021-2014
78. Utility of Copernicus-Based Inputs for Actual Evapotranspiration Modeling in Support of Sustainable Water Use in Agriculture R. Guzinski et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3122573
79. Assessment of upscaling methodologies for daily crop transpiration using sap flows and two-source energy balance models in almonds under different water statuses and production systems M. Quintanilla-Albornoz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4797-2024
80. Thermodynamically constrained surface energy balance using medium-resolution remote sensing for efficient evapotranspiration mapping Y. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2026.115510
81. Methods to estimate daily evapotranspiration from hourly evapotranspiration B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.11.008
82. Enhancing evapotranspiration estimates in orchards with the Surface Energy Balance for Partially Vegetated surfaces (SEB-PV) model through combined use of gridded soil moisture and temporal upscaling methods L. Cigarra-Guíñez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180569
83. Comparison of Four Different Energy Balance Models for Estimating Evapotranspiration in the Midwestern United States R. Singh & G. Senay https://doi.org/10.3390/w8010009
84. Accuracy comparison of remotely sensed evapotranspiration products and their associated water stress footprints under different land cover types in Korean peninsula U. Liaqat & M. Choi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.022
85. Evaluation of OSEB and SEBAL models for energy balance of a crop area in a humid subtropical climate J. Schirmbeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.2017208
86. A brief history of the thermal IR-based Two-Source Energy Balance (TSEB) model – diagnosing evapotranspiration from plant to global scales M. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.109951
87. Evaluation of two strategies from the SEBS model for estimating the daily terrestrial evapotranspiration values of the Tibetan Plateau Y. Kan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132921
88. Utility of an Automated Thermal-Based Approach for Monitoring Evapotranspiration W. Timmermans et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2015-0016
89. A GEE TSEB workflow for daily high-resolution fully remote sensing evapotranspiration: Validation over four crops in semi-arid conditions and comparison with the SSEBop experimental product I. El Hazdour et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106365
90. Redefining droughts for the U.S. Corn Belt: The dominant role of atmospheric vapor pressure deficit over soil moisture in regulating stomatal behavior of Maize and Soybean H. Kimm et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107930
91. Increased drip irrigation during heatwaves does not alter vineyard land surface temperature and evapotranspiration A. Gal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109781
92. Temporal Upscaling and Reconstruction of Thermal Remotely Sensed Instantaneous Evapotranspiration T. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70303400
93. Upscaling instantaneous to daily evapotranspiration using modelled daily shortwave radiation for remote sensing applications: an artificial neural network approach L. Wandera et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-197-2017
94. Application of the vineyard data assimilation (VIDA) system to vineyard root-zone soil moisture monitoring in the California Central Valley F. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00789-9
95. A Hybrid Model Coupling Physical Constraints and Machine Learning to Estimate Daily Evapotranspiration in the Heihe River Basin X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122143
96. A fully remote sensing-based implementation of the two-source energy balance model: an application over Mediterranean crops C. Cammalleri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109207
97. Multi-scale evapotranspiration and evaporative stress as indicators of vegetation health and drought response – an application in central Missouri, USA M. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115286
98. Comparative assessment of actual evapotranspiration partitioning models over an irrigated citrus orchard using remote sensing, agrometeorological, and micrometeorological data D. De Caro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110691