Articles | Volume 18, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1873-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1873-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
22 May 2014
Research article |
| 22 May 2014
Incipient subsurface heterogeneity and its effect on overland flow generation – insight from a modeling study of the first experiment at the Biosphere 2 Landscape Evolution Observatory
G.-Y. Niu
Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Biosphere 2, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
D. Pasetto
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre Eau Terre Environnement (INRS-ETE), Université du Québec, Quebec City, Canada
Department of Mathematics, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
C. Scudeler
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre Eau Terre Environnement (INRS-ETE), Université du Québec, Quebec City, Canada
C. Paniconi
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre Eau Terre Environnement (INRS-ETE), Université du Québec, Quebec City, Canada
M. Putti
Department of Mathematics, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
P. A. Troch
Biosphere 2, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
LEO Research and Design Team, Tucson, AZ, USA
S. B. DeLong
Biosphere 2, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
now at: United State Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA
K. Dontsova
Biosphere 2, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
L. Pangle
Biosphere 2, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
D. D. Breshears
School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
LEO Research and Design Team, Tucson, AZ, USA
J. Chorover
Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
LEO Research and Design Team, Tucson, AZ, USA
T. E. Huxman
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
LEO Research and Design Team, Tucson, AZ, USA
J. Pelletier
Department of Geosciences University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
LEO Research and Design Team, Tucson, AZ, USA
S. R. Saleska
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
LEO Research and Design Team, Tucson, AZ, USA
X. Zeng
Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
LEO Research and Design Team, Tucson, AZ, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 4,883 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Oct 2013)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,525 | 2,125 | 233 | 4,883 | 269 | 252 |
- HTML: 2,525
- PDF: 2,125
- XML: 233
- Total: 4,883
- BibTeX: 269
- EndNote: 252
Total article views: 3,801 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 22 May 2014)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,096 | 1,490 | 215 | 3,801 | 257 | 245 |
- HTML: 2,096
- PDF: 1,490
- XML: 215
- Total: 3,801
- BibTeX: 257
- EndNote: 245
Total article views: 1,082 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Oct 2013)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 429 | 635 | 18 | 1,082 | 12 | 7 |
- HTML: 429
- PDF: 635
- XML: 18
- Total: 1,082
- BibTeX: 12
- EndNote: 7
Cited
27 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Catchment‐scale Richards equation‐based modeling of evapotranspiration via boundary condition switching and root water uptake schemes M. Camporese et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017139
- Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: Survey and outlook C. Paniconi & M. Putti https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017780
- Multiresponse modeling of variably saturated flow and isotope tracer transport for a hillslope experiment at the Landscape Evolution Observatory C. Scudeler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4061-2016
- Pore water chemistry reveals gradients in mineral transformation across a model basaltic hillslope M. Pohlmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GC006270
- Effects of soil heterogeneity and preferential flow on the water flow and isotope transport in an experimental hillslope X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170548
- A hybrid‐3D hillslope hydrological model for use in Earth system models P. Hazenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016842
- Simulating the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil erosion, deposition, and yield using a coupled sediment dynamics and 3D distributed hydrologic model T. Zi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.004
- Rainfall Simulator Experiments to Investigate Macropore Impacts on Hillslope Hydrological Response Y. Smit et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology3040039
- The formation of colloids during the early-stage weathering of basalt M. Gelin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2026.123370
- An overview of current applications, challenges, and future trends in distributed process-based models in hydrology S. Fatichi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.026
- Estimating the Routing Parameter of the Xin’anjiang Hydrological Model Based on Remote Sensing Data and Machine Learning Y. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14184609
- Direct Observation of Hillslope Scale StorAge Selection Functions in Experimental Hydrologic Systems: Geomorphologic Structure and Preferential Discharge of Old Water M. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028959
- Impact of sensor failure on the observability of flow dynamics at the Biosphere 2 LEO hillslopes D. Pasetto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.04.014
- Effects of differential hillslope‐scale water retention characteristics on rainfall–runoff response at the Landscape Evolution Observatory D. van den Heuvel et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13148
- Examination of the seepage face boundary condition in subsurface and coupled surface/subsurface hydrological models C. Scudeler et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019277
- Testing the hybrid‐3‐D hillslope hydrological model in a controlled environment P. Hazenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018106
- The Landscape Evolution Observatory: A large-scale controllable infrastructure to study coupled Earth-surface processes L. Pangle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.01.020
- Thinking inside the box: Investigating peak storm response in a simplified outdoor slope setup F. Tauro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130064
- Evaluating a sensor setup with respect to near-surface soil water monitoring and determination of in-situ water retention functions R. Nolz & G. Kammerer https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.011
- Exploration of coupled surface–subsurface hydrological model responses and challenges through catchment- and hillslope-scale examples C. Paniconi et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2025.1553578
- “Cape Fear”—A Hybrid Hillslope Plot for Monitoring Hydrological Processes F. Tauro et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology4030035
- A comparison of statistical methods for evaluating missing data of monitoring wells in the Kazeroun Plain, Fars Province, Iran S. Asgharinia & A. Petroselli https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100294
- Modeling deep soil properties on California grassland hillslopes using LiDAR digital elevation models Y. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.01.005
- Cape Fear: monitoring basic hydrological processes in an outdoor hillslope plot A. Petroselli & F. Tauro https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5851-4
- Intercomparison of soil pore water extraction methods for stable isotope analysis and interpretation of hillslope runoff sources N. Orlowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13539
- Hillslope-scale experiment demonstrates the role of convergence during two-step saturation A. Gevaert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3681-2014
- Richards Equation at the Hillslope Scale: Can We Resolve the Heterogeneity of Soil Hydraulic Material Properties? H. Bauser et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032294
27 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Catchment‐scale Richards equation‐based modeling of evapotranspiration via boundary condition switching and root water uptake schemes M. Camporese et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017139
- Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: Survey and outlook C. Paniconi & M. Putti https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017780
- Multiresponse modeling of variably saturated flow and isotope tracer transport for a hillslope experiment at the Landscape Evolution Observatory C. Scudeler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4061-2016
- Pore water chemistry reveals gradients in mineral transformation across a model basaltic hillslope M. Pohlmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GC006270
- Effects of soil heterogeneity and preferential flow on the water flow and isotope transport in an experimental hillslope X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170548
- A hybrid‐3D hillslope hydrological model for use in Earth system models P. Hazenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016842
- Simulating the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil erosion, deposition, and yield using a coupled sediment dynamics and 3D distributed hydrologic model T. Zi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.004
- Rainfall Simulator Experiments to Investigate Macropore Impacts on Hillslope Hydrological Response Y. Smit et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology3040039
- The formation of colloids during the early-stage weathering of basalt M. Gelin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2026.123370
- An overview of current applications, challenges, and future trends in distributed process-based models in hydrology S. Fatichi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.026
- Estimating the Routing Parameter of the Xin’anjiang Hydrological Model Based on Remote Sensing Data and Machine Learning Y. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14184609
- Direct Observation of Hillslope Scale StorAge Selection Functions in Experimental Hydrologic Systems: Geomorphologic Structure and Preferential Discharge of Old Water M. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028959
- Impact of sensor failure on the observability of flow dynamics at the Biosphere 2 LEO hillslopes D. Pasetto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.04.014
- Effects of differential hillslope‐scale water retention characteristics on rainfall–runoff response at the Landscape Evolution Observatory D. van den Heuvel et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13148
- Examination of the seepage face boundary condition in subsurface and coupled surface/subsurface hydrological models C. Scudeler et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019277
- Testing the hybrid‐3‐D hillslope hydrological model in a controlled environment P. Hazenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018106
- The Landscape Evolution Observatory: A large-scale controllable infrastructure to study coupled Earth-surface processes L. Pangle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.01.020
- Thinking inside the box: Investigating peak storm response in a simplified outdoor slope setup F. Tauro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130064
- Evaluating a sensor setup with respect to near-surface soil water monitoring and determination of in-situ water retention functions R. Nolz & G. Kammerer https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.011
- Exploration of coupled surface–subsurface hydrological model responses and challenges through catchment- and hillslope-scale examples C. Paniconi et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2025.1553578
- “Cape Fear”—A Hybrid Hillslope Plot for Monitoring Hydrological Processes F. Tauro et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology4030035
- A comparison of statistical methods for evaluating missing data of monitoring wells in the Kazeroun Plain, Fars Province, Iran S. Asgharinia & A. Petroselli https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100294
- Modeling deep soil properties on California grassland hillslopes using LiDAR digital elevation models Y. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.01.005
- Cape Fear: monitoring basic hydrological processes in an outdoor hillslope plot A. Petroselli & F. Tauro https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5851-4
- Intercomparison of soil pore water extraction methods for stable isotope analysis and interpretation of hillslope runoff sources N. Orlowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13539
- Hillslope-scale experiment demonstrates the role of convergence during two-step saturation A. Gevaert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3681-2014
- Richards Equation at the Hillslope Scale: Can We Resolve the Heterogeneity of Soil Hydraulic Material Properties? H. Bauser et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032294
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 23 Sep 2026
