28 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Examining the relationship between development patterns and total phosphorus in the Galveston Bay Estuary H. Walters et al. 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.005
2. Ecosystem Services Indicators: Improving the Linkage between Biophysical and Economic Analyses J. Boyd et al. 10.2139/ssrn.2662053
3. Sustainable Flood Risk and Stormwater Management in Blue‐Green Cities; an Interdisciplinary Case Study in Portland, Oregon E. O’Donnell et al. 10.1111/1752-1688.12854
4. Valuing water quality in urban watersheds: A comparative analysis of Johnson Creek, Oregon, and Burnt Bridge Creek, Washington N. Netusil et al. 10.1002/2013WR014546
5. Dreams and Migration in South Korea’s Border Region: Landscape Change and Environmental Impacts H. Chang et al. 10.1080/24694452.2018.1549471
6. Activated carbon enhanced anaerobic digestion of food waste – Laboratory-scale and Pilot-scale operation L. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.020
7. Comparing the functional recognition of aesthetics, hydrology, and quality in urban stream restoration through the framework of environmental perception C. Hong et al. 10.1002/rra.3423
8. Sources of contaminated flood sediments in a rural–urban catchment: Johnson Creek, Oregon H. Chang et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12496
9. Parâmetros utilizados para determinação do índice de poluição difusa (IQApd) utilizando o método da teoria dos jogos cooperativos M. Gregório & A. Zuffo 10.36659/dae.2020.039
10. An alternative approach for socio-hydrology: case study research E. Mostert 10.5194/hess-22-317-2018
11. Multi-Scale Assessment of Relationships between Fragmentation of Riparian Forests and Biological Conditions in Streams . Yirigui et al. 10.3390/su11185060
12. Sociohydrology: Scientific Challenges in Addressing the Sustainable Development Goals G. Di Baldassarre et al. 10.1029/2018WR023901
13. Social Position Influencing the Water Perception Gap Between Local Leaders and Constituents in a Socio-Hydrological System M. Haeffner et al. 10.1002/2017WR021456
14. Response of discharge, TSS, and E. coli to rainfall events in urban, suburban, and rural watersheds H. Chen & H. Chang 10.1039/C4EM00327F
15. How well has land-use planning worked under different governance regimes? A case study in the Portland, OR-Vancouver, WA metropolitan area, USA J. Kline et al. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.013
16. A system dynamics based socio-hydrological model for agricultural wastewater reuse at the watershed scale H. Jeong & J. Adamowski 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.03.019
17. Moving sociohydrology forward: a synthesis across studies T. Troy et al. 10.5194/hessd-12-3319-2015
18. Bringing the “social” into sociohydrology: Conservation policy support in the Central Great Plains of Kansas, USA M. Sanderson et al. 10.1002/2017WR020659
19. Resident perceptions of urban stream restoration and water quality in South Korea C. Hong et al. 10.1002/rra.3265
20. Sensitivity of emergent sociohydrologic dynamics to internal system properties and external sociopolitical factors: Implications for water management Y. Elshafei et al. 10.1002/2015WR017944
21. Development of Future Land Cover Change Scenarios in the Metropolitan Fringe, Oregon, U.S., with Stakeholder Involvement R. Hoyer & H. Chang 10.3390/land3010322
22. Moving sociohydrology forward: a synthesis across studies T. Troy et al. 10.5194/hess-19-3667-2015
23. Residents' perception of flood risk and urban stream restoration using multi‐criteria decision analysis C. Hong & H. Chang 10.1002/rra.3728
24. The Effects of Ambient Water Quality and Eurasian Watermilfoil on Lakefront Property Values in the Coeur d’Alene Area of Northern Idaho, USA F. Liao et al. 10.3390/su8010044
25. A Paradigm Shift in Water Quality Governance in a Transitional Context: A Critical Study about the Empowerment of Local Governance in Georgia S. Withanachchi et al. 10.3390/w10020098
26. Engaging High School Students as Collaborators in Ecological Investigation of the Columbia River Estuary: Lessons from a Transdisciplinary University–High School Partnership G. Rollwagen‐Bollens et al. 10.1002/lob.10315
27. Ecosystem Services Indicators: Improving the Linkage between Biophysical and Economic Analyses J. Boyd et al. 10.2139/ssrn.2662053
28. Modeling the Dynamic Interrelations between Mobility, Utility, and Land Asking Price E. Hidayat et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/123/1/012019