- Articles & preprints
- Submission
- Policies
- Peer review
- Editorial board
- About
- EGU publications
- Manuscript tracking
Journal metrics
IF5.153
IF 5-year
5.460
5.460
CiteScore
7.8
7.8
SNIP1.623
IPP4.91
SJR2.092
Scimago H
index123
index123
h5-index65
Are streamflow recession characteristics really characteristic?
M. Stoelzle et al.
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 27 Feb 2013)
- Preprint (discussion started on 19 Sep 2012)
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC C4339: 'Review', Nir Krakauer, 24 Sep 2012
-
AC C5917: 'Authors Reply to N. Krakauer's Referee Comment on "Are streamflow recession characteristics really characteristic?" by M. Stoelzle et al.', Michael Stoelzle, 20 Dec 2012
-
AC C5917: 'Authors Reply to N. Krakauer's Referee Comment on "Are streamflow recession characteristics really characteristic?" by M. Stoelzle et al.', Michael Stoelzle, 20 Dec 2012
-
SC C4378: 'Power-transform method', John Ding, 25 Sep 2012
-
SC C5107: 'Addendum: ROSR transform', John Ding, 04 Nov 2012
-
AC C5932: 'Response to John Ding', Michael Stoelzle, 20 Dec 2012
-
SC C5107: 'Addendum: ROSR transform', John Ding, 04 Nov 2012
-
RC C4540: 'Referee comment', Anonymous Referee #2, 04 Oct 2012
-
AC C5933: 'Response to Referee #2', Michael Stoelzle, 20 Dec 2012
-
AC C5933: 'Response to Referee #2', Michael Stoelzle, 20 Dec 2012
-
RC C4558: 'Comment', Anonymous Referee #3, 04 Oct 2012
-
AC C5935: 'Response to Referee #3', Michael Stoelzle, 20 Dec 2012
-
AC C5935: 'Response to Referee #3', Michael Stoelzle, 20 Dec 2012
-
EC C6003: 'Thanks', Ciaran Harman, 21 Dec 2012
Download
All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.