48 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Stochastic modeling of suspended sediment load in alluvial rivers S. Shojaeezadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.06.006
2. Confidence intervals of the Kling-Gupta efficiency J. Vrugt & D. de Oliveira https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127968
3. Stochastic inversion for soil hydraulic parameters in the presence of model error: An example involving ground-penetrating radar monitoring of infiltration C. Köpke et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.016
4. Using maximum likelihood to derive various distance-based goodness-of-fit indicators for hydrologic modeling assessment Q. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1507-8
5. Uncertainty quantification in watershed hydrology: Which method to use? A. Gupta & R. Govindaraju https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128749
6. A short history of philosophies of hydrological model evaluation and hypothesis testing K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1761
7. Multihazard Scenarios for Analysis of Compound Extreme Events M. Sadegh et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077317
8. Quantification of predictive uncertainty in hydrological modelling by harnessing the wisdom of the crowd: A large-sample experiment at monthly timescale G. Papacharalampous et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103470
9. A hybrid time- and signature-domain Bayesian inference framework for calibration of hydrological models: a case study in the Ren River basin in China S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02282-3
10. Model Falsification from a Bayesian Viewpoint with Applications to Parameter Inference and Model Selection of Dynamical Systems A. Dasgupta & E. Johnson https://doi.org/10.1061/JENMDT.EMENG-7204
11. Comparison of Likelihood-Free Inference Approach and a Formal Bayesian Method in Parameter Uncertainty Assessment: Case Study with a Single-Event Rainfall–Runoff Model M. Nourali https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002048
12. Signature‐Domain Calibration of Hydrological Models Using Approximate Bayesian Computation: Empirical Analysis of Fundamental Properties F. Fenicia et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021616
13. Probabilistic programming: A review for environmental modellers C. Krapu & M. Borsuk https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.01.014
14. Verification of short-term runoff forecasts for a small Philippine basin (Marikina) D. Kneis et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1183773
15. Bayesian calibration of a flood simulator using binary flood extent observations M. Balbi & D. Lallemant https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1089-2023
16. Multivariate Copula Analysis Toolbox (MvCAT): Describing dependence and underlying uncertainty using a Bayesian framework M. Sadegh et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020242
17. Development of a stochastic hydrological modeling system for improving ensemble streamflow prediction Y. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127683
18. Parameter-state ensemble thinning for short-term hydrological prediction B. Davison et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-741-2019
19. Facets of uncertainty: epistemic uncertainty, non-stationarity, likelihood, hypothesis testing, and communication K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1031761
20. Improving probabilistic hydroclimatic projections through high-resolution convection-permitting climate modeling and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations S. Wang & Y. Wang https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04702-7
21. ApproximateBayesian computation methods for daily spatiotemporal precipitation occurrence simulation B. Olson & W. Kleiber https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019741
22. Improving Robustness of Hydrologic Ensemble Predictions Through Probabilistic Pre‐ and Post‐Processing in Sequential Data Assimilation S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2018WR022546
23. Water balance model (WBM) v.1.0.0: a scalable gridded global hydrologic model with water-tracking functionality D. Grogan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7287-2022
24. Automatic calibration and uncertainty quantification in waves dynamical downscaling R. Alonso & S. Solari https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2021.103944
25. On constructing limits-of-acceptability in watershed hydrology using decision trees A. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104486
26. Signature‐Domain Calibration of Hydrological Models Using Approximate Bayesian Computation: Theory and Comparison to Existing Applications D. Kavetski et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020528
27. On the use of distribution-adaptive likelihood functions: Generalized and universal likelihood functions, scoring rules and multi-criteria ranking J. Vrugt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128542
28. Parameter uncertainty in medium-term coastal morphodynamic modeling A. Kroon et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02300-8
29. Comparison of GLUE and DREAM for the estimation of cultivar parameters in the APSIM-maize model M. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107659
30. Estimating the parameters of a monthly hydrological model using hydrological signatures A. Matos et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.292420230121
31. Relative model score: a scoring rule for evaluating ensemble simulations with application to microbial soil respiration modeling A. Elshall et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1592-3
32. Revising tortuosity and multi-fractal assumptions of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from critical path analysis of percolation theory A. Rad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.06.002
33. Robust and efficient uncertainty quantification for extreme events that deviate significantly from the training dataset using polynomial chaos-kriging V. Tran & J. Kim https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127716
34. Conditional interval reduction method: A possible new direction for the optimization of process based models R. Hollós et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105556
35. A game theoretical low impact development optimization model for urban storm water management M. Latifi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118323
36. The stationarity paradigm revisited: Hypothesis testing using diagnostics, summary metrics, and DREAM(ABC) M. Sadegh et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016805
37. Multi-objective conflict resolution optimization model for reservoir’s selective depth water withdrawal considering water quality M. Haghighat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10475-y
38. Copula‐Based Convection‐Permitting Projections of Future Changes in Multivariate Drought Characteristics B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030686
39. A novel reliability analysis method for a dependent system by copula model: a case study in operation tunnels maintenance W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-022-00581-5
40. Flow parameter estimation using laser absorption spectroscopy and approximate Bayesian computation J. Christopher et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-03122-2
41. Impact of the numbers of observations and calibration parameters on equifinality, model performance, and output and parameter uncertainty Y. Her & I. Chaubey https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10487
42. Evaluation of hydrological models at gauged and ungauged basins using machine learning-based limits-of-acceptability and hydrological signatures A. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131774
43. A fuzzy multi-objective optimization approach for treated wastewater allocation S. Tayebikhorami et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7557-2
44. Bayesian inference and predictive performance of soil respiration models in the presence of model discrepancy A. Elshall et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2009-2019
45. Embracing equifinality with efficiency: Limits of Acceptability sampling using the DREAM(LOA) algorithm J. Vrugt & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.026
46. Parameter estimation for complex thermal-fluid flows using approximate Bayesian computation J. Christopher et al. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.104602
47. DREAM(LoAX): Simultaneous Calibration and Diagnosis for Tracer‐Aided Ecohydrological Models Under the Equifinality Thesis S. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR038779
48. A computationally efficient method for uncertainty analysis of SWAT model simulations P. Athira et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1538-9