35 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Challenges in conditioning a stochastic geological model of a heterogeneous glacial aquifer to a comprehensive soft data set J. Koch et al. 10.5194/hess-18-2907-2014
2. Multiple-point statistical simulation for hydrogeological models: 3-D training image development and conditioning strategies A. Høyer et al. 10.5194/hess-21-6069-2017
3. Transition probability‐based stochastic geological modeling using airborne geophysical data and borehole data X. He et al. 10.1002/2013WR014593
4. HYPPS: A hybrid geostatistical modeling algorithm for subsurface modeling P. Tahmasebi 10.1002/2017WR021078
5. Climate model uncertainty versus conceptual geological uncertainty in hydrological modeling T. Sonnenborg et al. 10.5194/hess-19-3891-2015
6. Nitrate vulnerability assessment of aquifers B. Hansen et al. 10.1007/s12665-016-5767-2
7. Spatial Sensitivity Analysis of Simulated Land Surface Patterns in a Catchment Model Using a Set of Innovative Spatial Performance Metrics J. Koch et al. 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0148.1
8. Estimation of soil loss by the WATEM/SEDEM model using an automatic parameter estimation procedure N. Bezak et al. 10.1007/s12665-015-4534-0
9. Using geophysical survey results in the inference of aquifer vulnerability measures N. Christensen & A. Christiansen 10.1002/nsg.12171
10. Quantifying stratigraphic uncertainty in groundwater modelling for infrastructure design L. Troldborg et al. 10.1007/s10040-021-02303-5
11. Assessing hydrological model predictive uncertainty using stochastically generated geological models X. He et al. 10.1002/hyp.10488
12. Combining 3D geological modelling techniques to address variations in geology, data type and density – An example from Southern Denmark F. Jørgensen et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2015.04.010
13. The effect of training image and secondary data integration with multiple-point geostatistics in groundwater modelling X. He et al. 10.5194/hess-18-2943-2014
14. Modelling a real-world buried valley system with vertical non-stationarity using multiple-point statistics X. He et al. 10.1007/s10040-016-1486-8
15. Impacts of land use, climate change and hydrological model structure on nitrate fluxes: Magnitudes and uncertainties I. Seidenfaden et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154671
16. Sandstone-body geometry and hydrostratigraphy of the northern High Plains Aquifer system, USA J. Korus & R. Joeckel 10.1144/qjegh2021-171
17. Multiple-point statistical modeling of three-dimensional glacial aquifer heterogeneity for improved groundwater management N. Kawo et al. 10.1007/s10040-023-02658-x
18. Development of a digital workflow for layer reduction strategies and visual-analytical outcome analysis to enhance geo-hydraulic modelling efficiency E. Nixdorf et al. 10.1080/28375807.2025.2460825
19. Generation of 3‐D hydrostratigraphic zones from dense airborne electromagnetic data to assess groundwater model prediction error N. Christensen et al. 10.1002/2016WR019141
20. Inverse methods in hydrogeology: Evolution and recent trends H. Zhou et al. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.10.014
21. Performance evaluation of groundwater model hydrostratigraphy from airborne electromagnetic data and lithological borehole logs P. Marker et al. 10.5194/hess-19-3875-2015
22. Markov based transition probability geostatistics in groundwater applications: assumptions and limitations A. Langousis et al. 10.1007/s00477-017-1504-y
23. Application of MODFLOW with Boundary Conditions Analyses Based on Limited Available Observations: A Case Study of Birjand Plain in East Iran R. Aghlmand & A. Abbasi 10.3390/w11091904
24. Uncertainty of heterogeneous hydrogeological models in groundwater flow and land subsidence simulations – A case study in Huwei Town, Taiwan D. Tran et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106543
25. Incorporating interpretation uncertainties from deterministic 3D hydrostratigraphic models in groundwater models T. Enemark et al. 10.5194/hess-28-505-2024
26. Evaluating the feasibility of using artificial neural networks to predict lithofacies in complex glacial deposits Z. Hammond & D. Allen 10.1007/s10040-023-02726-2
27. Assessing flow paths in a karst aquifer based on multiple dye tracing tests using stochastic simulation and the MODFLOW-CFP code A. Assari & Z. Mohammadi 10.1007/s10040-017-1595-z
28. Exploring Predictive Uncertainty at a Double‐Source Managed Aquifer Recharge Site via Stochastic Modeling G. Rudnik et al. 10.1029/2021WR031241
29. Conceptual hydrogeological and numerical groundwater flow modelling around the Moab Khutsong deep gold mine, South Africa. H. Mengistu et al. 10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100266
30. Groundwater Management and Allocation Models: A Review K. Norouzi Khatiri et al. 10.3390/w15020253
31. Analyzing the effect of transmissivity uncertainty on the reliability of a model of the northwestern Sahara aquifer system M. Zammouri & L. Ribeiro 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.02.034
32. Choosing various likelihood functions on uncertainty assessment in groundwater simulation-optimization model K. Norouzi Khatiri et al. 10.2166/ws.2020.003
33. The influence of layer and voxel geological modelling strategy on groundwater modelling results T. Enemark et al. 10.1007/s10040-021-02442-9
34. Development of a high-resolution 3D geological model for landfill leachate risk assessment A. Høyer et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.12.015
35. Three-dimensional geological modelling of AEM resistivity data — A comparison of three methods A. Høyer et al. 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.02.005