80 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Systems integration for global sustainability J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258832
2. Future evolution of virtual water trading in the United States electricity sector N. Graham et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac3289
3. Reallocating regional water apparent productivity in the long term: methodological contributions and application for Spain I. Cazcarro et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01485-9
4. Data and analysis toolbox for modeling the nexus of food, energy, and water M. Sadegh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102281
5. Food Self-Sufficiency across Scales: How Local Can We Go? P. Pradhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5005939
6. Moving sociohydrology forward: a synthesis across studies T. Troy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3667-2015
7. Non-renewable groundwater use and groundwater depletion: a review M. Bierkens & Y. Wada https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1a5f
8. Future virtual water flows under climate and population change scenarios: focusing on its determinants N. Ashktorab & M. Zibaei https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2021.190
9. Virtual water and water footprints do not provide helpful insight regarding international trade or water scarcity D. Wichelns https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.013
10. Developing a non-cooperative optimization model for water and crop area allocation based on leader-follower game A. Sedghamiz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.035
11. Global implications of regional grain production through virtual water trade M. Masud et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.392
12. Grain and Virtual Water Storage Capacity in the United States P. Ruess & M. Konar https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024292
13. Towards greener trade and global supply chain environmental accounting. An embodied environmental resources blockchain design X. Tian & J. Sarkis https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2232890
14. Water Footprint of crop productions: A review D. Lovarelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.022
15. Trends and environmental impacts of virtual water trade M. Mekonnen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00605-2
16. The Water Footprint of Food Aid N. Jackson et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066435
17. How Sustainable is the Increase in the Water Footprint of the Spanish Agricultural Sector? A Provincial Analysis between 1955 and 2005–2010 I. Cazcarro et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7055094
18. Spatiotemporal dynamics, components, and drivers of virtual water flows for grain crops in China J. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-026-02582-2
19. Adapting rice production to climate change for sustainable blue water consumption: an economic and virtual water analysis A. Darzi-Naftchali & F. Karandish https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2355-7
20. The water footprint of the Spanish agricultural sector: 1860–2010 R. Duarte et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.020
21. On inclusion of water resource management in Earth system models – Part 1: Problem definition and representation of water demand A. Nazemi & H. Wheater https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-33-2015
22. Analyzing the Contribution of Regional Water Resource through the Regional Blue Water Flows of Rice Products S. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2016.58.1.073
23. The effect of globalisation on water consumption: A case study of the Spanish virtual water trade, 1849–1935 R. Duarte et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.020
24. Inversed virtual water flow pattern and its influencing factors in Northwest China S. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111340
25. Food–Energy–Water Nexus: Quantifying Embodied Energy and GHG Emissions from Irrigation through Virtual Water Transfers in Food Trade N. Vora et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02122
26. Learning from the Ancient Maya: Exploring the Impact of Drought on Population Dynamics L. Kuil et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.018
27. Global virtual water trade and the hydrological cycle: patterns, drivers, and socio-environmental impacts P. D’Odorico et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab05f4
28. Global hydrology 2015: State, trends, and directions M. Bierkens https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017173
29. The Impact of Consumption Patterns and Urbanization on the Cross-Regional Water Footprint in China: A Decomposition Analysis H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.792423
30. Sustainable agricultural production, income, and eco‐labeling: What can be learned from a modern Ricardian approach? K. Heerman & I. Sheldon https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13279
31. Analysis of the characteristics of the global virtual water trade network using degree and eigenvector centrality, with a focus on food and feed crops S. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4223-2016
32. Global trade in the Anthropocene: A review of trends and direction of environmental factor flows during the Great Acceleration J. Brolin & A. Kander https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019620973711
33. A growing produce bubble: United States produce tied to Mexico’s unsustainable agricultural water use S. Hartman et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac286d
34. Quantifying Resource Nexus: Virtual Water Flows, Water Stress Indices, and Unsustainable Import Fraction in South Korea’s Grain Trade Landscape G. Odey et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062419
35. Virtual water trade: Does bilateral tariff matter? R. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108216
36. One-way coupling of an integrated assessment model and a water resources model: evaluation and implications of future changes over the US Midwest N. Voisin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4555-2013
37. Sustainable Water Use for International Agricultural Trade: The Case of Pakistan T. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112259
38. Blind Spots in Water Management, and How Natural Sciences Could Be Much More Relevant I. Cazcarro & J. Bielsa https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01742
39. A virtual water network of the Roman world B. Dermody et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5025-2014
40. National water saving through import of agriculture and livestock products: A case study from India K. Brindha https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.12.005
41. Todayʼs virtual water consumption and trade under future water scarcity B. Orlowsky et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/7/074007
42. Agricultural crop trade alleviates China’s water shortage but redistributes water value unevenly S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-026-00156-7
43. PCR-GLOBWB 2: a 5 arcmin global hydrological and water resources model E. Sutanudjaja et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2429-2018
44. Virtual water flows under projected climate, land use and population change: the case of UK feed barley and meat D. Yawson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03127
45. Water resources conservation and nitrogen pollution reduction under global food trade and agricultural intensification W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.306
46. Evaluation of the Dependency and Intensity of the Virtual Water Trade in Korea S. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.1957
47. Developing the greatest Blue Economy: Water productivity, fresh water depletion, and virtual water trade in the Great Lakes basin A. Mayer et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000371
48. Future changes in the trading of virtual water N. Graham et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17400-4
49. Agricultural virtual water flows within the United States Q. Dang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015919
50. Savings and losses of global water resources in food‐related virtual water trade W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1320
51. Progress in socio‐hydrology: a meta‐analysis of challenges and opportunities S. Pande & M. Sivapalan https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1193
52. A framework for modelling the complexities of food and water security under globalisation B. Dermody et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-103-2018
53. The Water Footprint of the United States M. Konar & L. Marston https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113286
54. Water balance model (WBM) v.1.0.0: a scalable gridded global hydrologic model with water-tracking functionality D. Grogan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7287-2022
55. The Paradox of Agricultural Virtual Water Trade A. Igbaroola https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X26500165
56. Virtual water trade patterns in relation to environmental and socioeconomic factors: A case study for Tunisia H. Chouchane et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.032
57. Virtual water trade and development in Africa M. Konar & K. Caylor https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3969-2013
58. The Global Food‐Energy‐Water Nexus P. D'Odorico et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017RG000591
59. The ISIMIP groundwater sector: a framework for ensemble modeling of global change impacts on groundwater R. Reinecke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-523-2026
60. International virtual water flows from agricultural and livestock products of India K. Brindha https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.005
61. Complementary Vantage Points: Integrating Hydrology and Economics for Sociohydrologic Knowledge Generation M. Müller & M. Levy https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024786
62. Investigating the effects of climate change on the virtual water of some crops in Kerman province M. Ekhlasi et al. https://doi.org/10.61186/jgs.25.76.20
63. Temporal variability of water footprint for cereal production and its controls in Saskatchewan, Canada Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.410
64. The water footprint of staple crop trade under climate and policy scenarios M. Konar et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/035006
65. Modifying the virtual water trade of rice for global sustainability of freshwater resources M. Hekmatnia et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-024-01164-6
66. Agricultural market integration preserves future global water resources N. Graham et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.08.003
67. The U.S. food–energy–water system: A blueprint to fill the mesoscale gap for science and decision-making C. Lant et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1077-0
68. Evaluation of crop production, trade, and consumption from the perspective of water resources: A case study of the Hetao irrigation district, China, for 1960–2010 J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.088
69. Towards more spatially explicit assessments of virtual water flows: linking local water use and scarcity to global demand of Brazilian farming commodities R. Flach et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/075003
70. Exposure of urban food–energy–water (FEW) systems to water scarcity L. Djehdian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101621
71. From water footprint to climate change adaptation: Capacity development with teenagers to save water C. Haida et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.043
72. Evaluation of Physical and Economic Water-Saving Efficiency for Virtual Water Flows Related to Inter-Regional Crop Trade in China J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114308
73. Driving factors of virtual water in international grain trade: A study for belt and road countries W. Xia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107441
74. The neglected costs of water peace J. Dell'Angelo et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1316
75. A vital link: water and vegetation in the Anthropocene D. Gerten https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3841-2013
76. Land Use Misclassification Results in Water Use, Economic Value, and GHG Emission Discrepancies in California’s High-Intensity Agriculture Region V. Espinoza et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086829
77. Living at the Water’s Edge: A World-Wide Econometric Panel Estimation of Arable Water Footprint Drivers P. Gracia-de-Rentería et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041060
78. Consumptive water footprint and virtual water trade scenarios for China — With a focus on crop production, consumption and trade L. Zhuo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.019
79. Environmental and economic risk management of seed maize production in Iran F. Fathi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120772
80. Measuring scarce water saving from interregional virtual water flows in China X. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaba49