169 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Assessing Parameter Importance of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model Based On Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods D. Ji et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027348
2. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of landscape structure and habitat quality in river corridors with ceased flow: A case study of the Yongding River corridor in Beijing, China X. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123861
3. Machine Learning for the Sensitivity Analysis of a Model of the Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Cancer S. Iaquinta et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3878
4. Comprehensive sensitivity analysis and process risk assessment of large scale pharmaceutical crystallization processes M. Öner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106746
5. Property-based Sensitivity Analysis: An approach to identify model implementation and integration errors T. Iwanaga et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105013
6. Parameter evaluation and optimization for multi-resolution segmentation in object-based shadow detection using very high resolution imagery H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1222632
7. Sensitivity Analysis for ReaxFF Reparametrization Using the Hilbert–Schmidt Independence Criterion M. Freitas Gustavo et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01320
8. Global importance measure methodology for integrated probabilistic risk assessment T. Sakurahara et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X19879316
9. Factors Determining the Natural Fresh‐Salt Groundwater Distribution in Deltas J. van Engelen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027290
10. Visualization facilitates uncertainty evaluation of multiple-point geostatistical stochastic simulation Q. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44267-023-00016-9
11. Model‐based analysis of the influence of catchment properties on hydrologic partitioning across five mountain headwater subcatchments C. Kelleher et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016147
12. Identification of parameter importance for benzene transport in the unsaturated zone using global sensitivity analysis M. Cohen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1585-2024
13. Prediction and interpretation of pathogenic bacteria occurrence at a recreational beach using data-driven algorithms J. Jang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102370
14. A multi-criteria trajectory-based parameter sampling strategy for the screening method of elementary effects Y. Khare et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.11.013
15. Assessing Changes of Water Yield in Qinghai Lake Watershed of China X. Lian et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010011
16. Development and testing of a SOSM approach to examine the natural attenuation of oil spillage on shorelines Z. Yang & Z. Chen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129579
17. Estimation of water provision service for monsoon catchments of South China: Applicability of the InVEST model D. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.011
18. Unveiling how rainfall spatial structure and displacement drive peak flow magnitude and onset in small mountainous watersheds Y. Huang & Y. Tsang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134069
19. Sensitivity analysis of machining accuracy of multi-axis machine tool based on POE screw theory and Morris method Q. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7791-x
20. Sensitivity analysis of Repast computational ecology models with R/Repast A. Prestes García & A. Rodríguez‐Patón https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2580
21. Quantification of predictive uncertainty with a metamodel: toward more efficient hydrologic simulations V. Tran & J. Kim https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01703-0
22. Sensitivity Analysis for Modeling of Cr(VI) Transfer From Soil to Surface Runoff X. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.917103
23. Dimensionality reduction and identification of valid parameter bounds for the efficient calibration of automated driving functions N. Fraikin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41104-019-00043-z
24. Anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural feedstock at industrial scale: Validating ‘Physical Twin’ lab scale parameters and modelling complex feedstock co-digestion R. Murali et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2026.110351
25. Sensitivity Analysis of Fully Distributed Parameterization Reveals Insights Into Heterogeneous Catchment Responses for Water Quality Modeling X. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025575
26. ML-AMPSIT: Machine Learning-based Automated Multi-method Parameter Sensitivity and Importance analysis Tool D. Di Santo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-433-2025
27. Employing sensitivity analysis to catchments having scanty data S. Nabi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20514-5
28. Component Combination Test to Investigate Improvement of the IHACRES and GR4J Rainfall–Runoff Models M. Shin & C. Kim https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152126
29. A non-equilibrium thermodynamics framework for daily simulation of coupled water and heat transport in variably saturated and frozen soils I. Borzì https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2026.105257
30. Evaluation of the ecological sensitivity and security of tidal flats in Shanghai Y. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.033
31. Investigating the potential of Morris algorithm for improving the computational constraints of global sensitivity analysis S. Nabi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14994-0
32. A novel sediment transport framework integrating ponds’ topology and retention processes for agricultural catchments Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.109696
33. Geospatial understanding of climate parameters within watershed boundaries of India F. Ahmad & L. Goparaju https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-020-00323-z
34. Uncertainty Decomposition to Understand the Influence of Water Systems Model Error in Climate Vulnerability Assessments S. Steinschneider et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032349
35. Parameter uncertainty and temporal dynamics of sensitivity for hydrologic models: A hybrid sequential data assimilation and probabilistic collocation method Y. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.012
36. Combining the Morris method and multiple error metrics to assess aquifer characteristics and recharge in the lower Ticino Basin, in Italy E. Baker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128536
37. Soil vertical heterogeneity reduces rootzone soil moisture bias in hyper-resolution land surface model over smallholder agricultural systems V. Krishnan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110673
38. The temporal variations in runoff-generation parameters of the Xinanjiang model due to human activities: A case study in the upper Yangtze River Basin, China X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100910
39. Parameter Sensitivity Analysis for Computationally Intensive Spatially Distributed Dynamical Environmental Systems Models X. Huo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001573
40. Index System of Water Resources Development and Utilization Level Based on Water-Saving Society C. Dai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14050802
41. Modelling and control of magnetorheological hydro-pneumatic suspension system based on multibody system transfer matrix method M. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2025.2488952
42. Sensitivity analysis of simulated Lycium barbarum L. yield in the WOFOST model under different climate conditions Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110602
43. Identifying Dominant Processes in Time and Space: Time‐Varying Spatial Sensitivity Analysis for a Grid‐Based Nitrate Model S. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031149
44. Parameter space exploration for the probabilistic damage stability method for dry cargo ships B. Milatz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2023.100549
45. Constraining topsoil pesticide degradation in a conceptual distributed catchment model with compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) S. Payraudeau et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4179-2025
46. Inversion of hydrogeological parameters based on an adaptive dynamic surrogate model Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02493-6
47. Sensitivity analysis of a 2D flood inundation model. A case study of Tous Dam A. Ullah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11500-w
48. Assessing the predictive impact of factor fixing with an adaptive uncertainty-based approach Q. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105290
49. Sensitivity Analysis to Investigate the Reliability of the Grid-Based Rainfall-Runoff Model M. Shin & Y. Choi https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121839
50. A framework for 2-stage global sensitivity analysis of GastroPlus™ compartmental models M. Scherholz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-018-9573-1
51. Site-specific herbicide spraying can control weeds as well as full spraying in the long-term. A simulation study T. Maillot et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108338
52. A Deep Neural Network Approach to Predict Overlay Thickness of Asphalt Pavements Using Deflection Parameters and Estimated Traffic A. Haridas et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000388
53. Coordination and control – limits in standard representations of multi-reservoir operations in hydrological modeling C. Rougé et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1365-2021
54. Ensemble artificial neural network and generalized additive model for data-scarce regional frequency analysis in design flood estimation J. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134886
55. Modelling the performance of an integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) system: a systematic approach to automated calibration D. Pryce et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13779-w
56. Global sensitivity analysis of a three-dimensional nutrients-algae dynamic model for a large shallow lake X. Yi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.01.005
57. Prediction of atmospheric pollutants in urban environment based on coupled deep learning model and sensitivity analysis S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138830
58. Fast assimilation of frequently acquired 4D seismic data for reservoir history matching Z. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2019.04.001
59. Hydrological Stability and Sensitivity Analysis of the Cahaba River Basin: A Combined Review and Simulation Study P. Preetha et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18080894
60. Guidance on evaluating parametric model uncertainty at decision-relevant scales J. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2519-2022
61. Sensitivity of hydrologic and geologic parameters on recharge processes in a highly heterogeneous, semi-confined aquifer system S. Maples et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2437-2020
62. Assessment of the suitability of rainfall–runoff models by coupling performance statistics and sensitivity analysis M. Shin & C. Kim https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.129
63. Comprehensive multivariate sensitivity analysis of CFD-DEM simulations: Critical model parameters and their impact on fluidization hydrodynamics A. Bakshi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.06.049
64. Similarities and differences in the sensitivity of soil organic matter (SOM) dynamics to biogeochemical parameters for different vegetation inputs and climates G. Ceriotti et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01868-z
65. An Agent-Based Model of a Sustainable Forest Operation in a Theoretical Lowland Dipterocarp Forest Modeled after Mount Makiling Forest Reserve, Philippines Z. Arnejo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020428
66. Calculator to Estimate Annual Infiltration Performance of Roadside Swales M. García-Serrana et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001650
67. Sensitivity of seismic response of pile-supported, multi-span viaduct bridges to interaction between soil-foundation and structural parameters M. Chaudhary https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01145-2
68. ADDI-Spraydrift: A comprehensive model of pesticide spray drift with an assessment in vineyards M. Djouhri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.05.008
69. Global sensitivity analysis of parameter uncertainty in landscape evolution models C. Skinner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4873-2018
70. Soil environmental health linkages with the landscape structure in Raichur district, Karnataka, India T. Ramachandra & P. Negi https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-025-00313-4
71. Distributed Evaluation of Local Sensitivity Analysis (DELSA), with application to hydrologic models O. Rakovec et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014063
72. Global evaluation and sensitivity analysis of a physically based flow and reactive transport model on a laboratory experiment L. Gatel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.12.006
73. Toward Explainable Multimodal Fake News Detection: A Fusion of Prompt Learning and Automated Machine Learning T. Gedara et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3627504
74. Temporal and spatial scaling effects of parameter sensitivity in relation to non-point source pollution simulation L. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.01.045
75. Sub-Watershed Parameter Transplantation Method for Non-Point Source Pollution Estimation in Complex Underlying Surface Environment X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121387
76. Quantifying the controls on reactive solute transport in multiscale heterogeneous sediments B. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-025-03146-2
77. Insights on geologic and vegetative controls over hydrologic behavior of a large complex basin – Global Sensitivity Analysis of an integrated parallel hydrologic model V. Srivastava et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.020
78. Sensitivity analysis in a radiological impact assessment of a nuclear power plant discharge. A comparison of the Morris, Spearman and Sobol’ approaches V. Nicoulaud-Gouin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106770
79. Global sensitivity analysis in hydrological modeling: Review of concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications X. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.013
80. A dual-continuum model (TOUGH2) for characterizing flow and discharge in a mechanically disrupted sandstone overburden D. Bedoya-Gonzalez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02507-3
81. High-risk nuclide screening and parameter sensitivity analysis based on numerical simulation and machine learning X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136002
82. A coupled ensemble filtering and probabilistic collocation approach for uncertainty quantification of hydrological models Y. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.035
83. Prospective life cycle and circularity assessment of circular business models using an empirically grounded agent‐based model R. Koide et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.70090
84. Global sensitivity analysis of an energy–economy model of the residential building sector F. Branger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.021
85. Techniques for Multilevel Design Optimization of Permanent Magnet Motors G. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2015.2444434
86. A PCM-based stochastic hydrological model for uncertainty quantification in watershed systems Y. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0954-8
87. Portfolio optimization for seed selection in diverse weather scenarios O. Marko et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184198
88. Stable expression and control parameters in the numerical simulation of unsaturated flow Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0893-2
89. Global sensitivity study of non-reactive and sorptive solute dispersivity in multiscale heterogeneous sediments W. Ren et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129274
90. Applying a Global Sensitivity Analysis Workflow to Improve the Computational Efficiencies in Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling N. Hsieh et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00588
91. Parametric sensitivity analysis as an essential ingredient of spectroscopic ellipsometry data modeling: An application of the Morris screening method D. Likhachev https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5126074
92. Rainstorm Magnitude Likely Regulates Event Water Fraction and Its Transit Time in Mesoscale Mountainous Catchments: Implication for Modelling Parameterization J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041169
93. Embedding geological realizations in global sensitivity analysis: a Morris-based screening approach for complex aquifer systems D. Furlanetto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.136020
94. Achieving robust design through statistical effect screening K. Van Buren & F. Hemez https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4981
95. Anchor-based ontology partitioning and Genetic Programming with Relevance Reasoning for large-scale biomedical ontology matching D. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126445
96. Machine learning framework to enhance the predictive performance of the relative availability of heavy metals in soils around a gold mine in Hainan Island X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.141007
97. Modeling the acoustic properties of South China sea sediments: parameter sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization approach Q. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001-026-09609-7
98. Understanding the effects of revegetated shrubs on fluxes of energy, water, and gross primary productivity in a desert steppe ecosystem using the STEMMUS–SCOPE model E. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-893-2024
99. On the complementary roles of XVARS and SHAP in explainable AI B. Panigrahi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2026.107007
100. Investigating the spatiotemporal behavior of VIC model parameters over the Tibetan plateau via global sensitivity analysis and machine learning Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2026.2625537
101. From maps to movies: high-resolution time-varying sensitivity analysis for spatially distributed watershed models J. Herman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5109-2013
102. A comprehensive approach to conducting multi-criteria sensitivity analysis of computationally expensive multidimensional hydrodynamic-ecology models (MHEs) S. Gebremariam https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2025.2497883
103. A user-friendly software package for VIC hydrologic model development S. Wi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.09.006
104. PITCH: A model simulating the transfer and retention of pesticides in infiltrating ditches and channel networks for management design purposes C. Dagès et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164602
105. Parameter Sensitivity of the Noah-MP Land Surface Model with Dynamic Vegetation K. Arsenault et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-17-0205.1
106. Many-objective optimization of energy conservation and emission reduction under uncertainty: A case study in China's cement industry C. Doh Dinga & Z. Wen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124168
107. Quantifying the impacts of land cover change on hydrological responses in the Mahanadi river basin in India S. Naha et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6339-2021
108. Uncertainty of canopy interception modeling in high-altitude Picea crassifolia forests of Semi-arid regions J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110190
109. Global Sensitivity Analysis of environmental models: Convergence and validation F. Sarrazin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.005
110. Robust Subsampling ANOVA Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of Water Resource and Environmental Models F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02608-2
111. Effective Global Sensitivity Analysis for High-Dimensional Hydrologic and Water Quality Models Y. Khare et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001726
112. Towards learning universal, regional, and local hydrological behaviors via machine learning applied to large-sample datasets F. Kratzert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5089-2019
113. Climate change impacts model parameter sensitivity – implications for calibration strategy and model diagnostic evaluation L. Melsen & B. Guse https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1307-2021
114. Sensitivity analysis applied to SiC failure probability in TRISO modeled with BISON C. Ghezzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104431
115. A Simple Time-Varying Sensitivity Analysis (TVSA) for Assessment of Temporal Variability of Hydrological Processes Y. Medina & E. Muñoz https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092463
116. Exploring the impact of forcing error characteristics on physically based snow simulations within a global sensitivity analysis framework M. Raleigh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3153-2015
117. Assessing sensitivities in algorithmic detection of tropical cyclones in climate data C. Zarzycki & P. Ullrich https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071606
118. Data assimilation for urban stormwater and water quality simulations using deep reinforcement learning M. Jeung et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129973
119. Global sensitivity analysis of a dynamic vegetation model: Model sensitivity depends on successional time, climate and competitive interactions N. Huber et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.013
120. Sensitivity of forest water balance and physiological drought predictions to soil and vegetation parameters – A model-based study M. Speich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.01.016
121. Sensitivity analysis of reference evapotranspiration to sensor accuracy K. DeJonge et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2014.11.013
122. Drivers of spatiotemporal variability of river water quality L. Schauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae692c
123. Ensemble deep learning enabled multi-condition generative design of aerial building machine considering uncertainties J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105134
124. Independent Validation of an In Silico Tool for a Pilot-Scale Pharmaceutical Crystallization Process Development M. Öner et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9040640
125. Evaluation of a new observationally based channel parameterization for the National Water Model A. Heldmyer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6121-2022
126. Model Variable Augmentation (MVA) for Diagnostic Assessment of Sensitivity Analysis Results J. Mai & B. Tolson https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023382
127. Position paper: Sensitivity analysis of spatially distributed environmental models- a pragmatic framework for the exploration of uncertainty sources H. Koo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104857
128. A two-stage sensitivity analysis for parameter identification and calibration of a physically-based distributed model in a river basin S. Sreedevi & T. Eldho https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1602730
129. Stochastic deep collocation method based on neural architecture search and transfer learning for heterogeneous porous media H. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01586-2
130. Industrial-environmental management in China's iron and steel industry under multiple objectives and uncertainties D. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114785
131. Long term power prices and renewable energy market values in Norway – A probabilistic approach E. Jåstad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106182
132. A streamlined approach to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models with spatial outputs with an example from geodiversity assessment A. Ligmann-Zielinska et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2024.2348065
133. Spatially distributed sensitivity of simulated global groundwater heads and flows to hydraulic conductivity, groundwater recharge, and surface water body parameterization R. Reinecke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4561-2019
134. Assessing the Sensitivity of the Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer to the Parameterization of Momentum Flux in the Community Earth System Model K. Nardi et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-21-0186.1
135. Global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional problems: How to objectively group factors and measure robustness and convergence while reducing computational cost R. Sheikholeslami et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.002
136. Enhancing cardiovascular monitoring: a non-linear model for characterizing RR interval fluctuations in exercise and recovery M. Castillo-Aguilar et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93654-6
137. Multiobjective sensitivity analysis and model parameterization approach for coupled streamflow and groundwater table depth simulations using SHETRAN in a wet humid tropical catchment S. Sreedevi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124217
138. A framework for assessing uncertainty of drinking water quality in distribution networks with application to monochloramine decay M. Frankel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137056
139. Sensitivity analysis of hydrological models: review and way forward M. Devak & C. Dhanya https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2017.149
140. Developing a cloud-based toolbox for sensitivity analysis of a water quality model S. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105068
141. Parameterisation of an integrated groundwater-surface water model for hydrological analysis of boreal aapa mire wetlands A. Jaros et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.094
142. Impacts of massive pumping on flood processes in polders—with a case study on Lannihu basin in the Dongting Lake District, China J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14365
143. Assessing WRF model parameter sensitivity: A case study with 5 day summer precipitation forecasting in the Greater Beijing Area Z. Di et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061623
144. Sustainable urban greening in cold cities: A multi-objective framework for energy savings, emission reduction, and cost optimization D. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106621
145. A directly coil-actuated cyclic pitch control based rotor: Design, modeling, and analysis Q. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108423
146. Modelling of the thermal regime of permafrost during 1990–2014 in Hornsund, Svalbard T. Wawrzyniak et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/popore-2016-0013
147. The impact of evaporation fractionation on the inverse estimation of soil hydraulic and isotope transport parameters T. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128100
148. Optimizing hydrological modelling on real urban catchment: impact of calibration data selection and objective function M. Assaf et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133821
149. A new deep sparse unfolding network with variational Bayesian enhancement for high-resolution localization of acoustic sources S. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111744
150. GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS METHODS APPLIED TO HYDROLOGIC MODELING WITH THE SAC-SMA MODEL E. Uliana et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v39n1p65-74/2019
151. Temporal transferability of spatially derived Manning’s roughness across flood regimes in the Mississippi River M. Zafar & M. Phanikumar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135186
152. Are we eliciting the right preferences? Insights from spatial MCDA sensitivity and uncertainty analysis S. Lacroix et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2026.107137
153. Yellow River Basin water stress has eased but may persist without enhanced efficiency and sustainable agriculture L. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44458-025-00005-7
154. Sensitivity Analysis of the Composite Data-Driven Pipelines in the Automated Machine Learning I. Barabanova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.10.050
155. A mathematical model of competition between fiber and mucin degraders in the gut provides a possible explanation for mucus thinning T. Jegatheesan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111824
156. Incorporating deep uncertainty into the elementary effects method for robust global sensitivity analysis L. Gao & B. Bryan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.10.016
157. A Bayesian-based multilevel factorial analysis method for analyzing parameter uncertainty of hydrological model Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.048
158. Characterizing variability and uncertainty for parameter subset selection in PBPK models C. Schacht et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf103
159. Sensitivity study on accuracy and relevant parameters in numerical modeling of internal tendon breaks A. Paul et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70619
160. Modeling of true triaxial strength of rocks based on optimized genetic programming B. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109601
161. Global sensitivity analysis of piezoelectric energy harvesters R. Aloui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111317
162. Screening methods for sensitivity analysis applied to thin composite laminated structures G. De Zanet & A. Viquerat https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108870
163. An integrated approach to streamflow estimation and flood inundation mapping using VIC, RAPID and LISFLOOD-FP S. Nandi & M. Reddy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127842
164. Characterizing hydraulic properties of the Upper Jurassic aquifer in Southeast Germany using simulated pumping tests of a complex multiwell geothermal site M. Morsi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2025.103566
165. Multivariate global sensitivity analysis for dynamic models based on wavelet analysis S. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.10.007
166. Spatial Pattern Oriented Multicriteria Sensitivity Analysis of a Distributed Hydrologic Model M. Demirel et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091188
167. Bridging factor of safety prediction and strength reduction workflows using an interpretable Transformer-enhanced ensemble model Q. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2026.107968
168. Sensitivity analysis using Morris: Just screening or an effective ranking method? L. Paleari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109648
169. Optimization of irrigation scheduling for maize in arid regions Northwest China based on water stress diagnosis in models L. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344848