109 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A global analysis of terrestrial plant litter dynamics in non-perennial waterways T. Datry et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0134-4
2. Aqua temporaria incognita H. van Meerveld et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13979
3. Regional watershed characterization and classification with river network analyses C. Gaucherel et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4172
4. What Triggers Streamflow for Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams in Low‐Gradient Catchments in Mediterranean Climates K. Gutiérrez‐Jurado et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025041
5. A Brief Review of Random Forests for Water Scientists and Practitioners and Their Recent History in Water Resources H. Tyralis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050910
6. Evaluating a landscape-scale daily water balance model to support spatially continuous representation of flow intermittency throughout stream networks S. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5279-2020
7. Understanding controls on flow permanence in intermittent rivers to aid ecological research: integrating meteorology, geology and land cover K. Costigan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1712
8. Global prevalence of non-perennial rivers and streams M. Messager et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03565-5
9. Monitoring river flow status using low-cost wildlife camera and image segmentation artificial intelligence J. Bao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106715
10. Intermittent Rivers: A Challenge for Freshwater Ecology T. Datry et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bit027
11. Predicting flow intermittence in France under climate change E. Sauquet et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1963444
12. Increased depth to the water table during river drying decreases the resilience of Gammarus pulex and alters ecosystem function R. Vander Vorste et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1716
13. Non-perennial Mediterranean rivers in Europe: Status, pressures, and challenges for research and management N. Skoulikidis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.147
14. Conceptualization and pilot application of a model-based environmental flow assessment adapted for intermittent rivers C. Theodoropoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-018-0605-0
15. Spatial variability in nutrient and organic matter concentrations during hydrological fragmentation of an intermittent temperate catchment A. Casanova et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-025-01247-2
16. Flow intermittency influences the trophic base, but not the overall diversity of alpine stream food webs A. Siebers et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04597
17. Intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams: Perspectives for critical zone science and research on socio‐ecosystems O. Fovet et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1523
18. Zero-flow and hydrotype estimation with karst-SWAT and Sentinel-2 data in the Keritis Basin, Crete G. Manfreda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103431
19. Mapping the temporary and perennial character of whole river networks A. González‐Ferreras & J. Barquín https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020390
20. Mediterranean intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams: Challenges in monitoring complexity A. Borg Galea et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2149
21. Streamflow permanence in headwater streams across four geomorphic provinces in Northern California A. Pate et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13889
22. Identifying Non-Perennial River Reaches: A Hybrid Model Combining WEP-L and Random Forest K. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310543
23. Will rivers become more intermittent in France? Learning from an extended set of hydrological projections T. Jaouen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3629-2025
24. Accounting for flow intermittence in freshwater species distribution modelling M. Dalibard et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2346
25. Defining Dry Rivers as the Most Extreme Type of Non-Perennial Fluvial Ecosystems M. Vidal-Abarca et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177202
26. Nonlinear trends in signatures characterizing non-perennial US streams K. Kar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131131
27. Classifying Streamflow Duration: The Scientific Basis and an Operational Framework for Method Development K. Fritz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092545
28. Improving calibration of groundwater flow models using headwater streamflow intermittence R. Abhervé et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15167
29. Predictive Modeling of Envelope Flood Extents Using Geomorphic and Climatic‐Hydrologic Catchment Characteristics R. Tavares da Costa et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026453
30. Ecological research and management of intermittent rivers: an historical review and future directions C. Leigh et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12646
31. Ensemble reconstruction of spatio-temporal extreme low-flow events in France since 1871 L. Caillouet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2923-2017
32. Assessing the Influence of Zero‐Flow Threshold Choice for Characterising Intermittent Stream Hydrology S. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15300
33. Temporary streams in temperate zones: recognizing, monitoring and restoring transitional aquatic‐terrestrial ecosystems R. Stubbington et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1223
34. Water-level recession characteristics in isolated pools within non-perennial streams S. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104267
35. Detection and attribution of flood trends in Mediterranean basins Y. Tramblay et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4419-2019
36. Classification and prediction of river network ephemerality and its relevance for waterborne disease epidemiology J. Perez-Saez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.10.003
37. Science and Management of Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams (SMIRES) T. Datry et al. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21774
38. The sensitivity of aquatic microbial communities to a complex agricultural contaminant depends on previous drought conditions C. Courcoul et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118396
39. Controls on Discharge and Drying in an Intermittent Grassland Stream: Temporal and Network Variability M. Raihan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.70108
40. Flow intermittence prediction using a hybrid hydrological modelling approach: influence of observed intermittence data on the training of a random forest model L. Mimeau et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-851-2024
41. Rethinking ecosystem service indicators for their application to intermittent rivers A. Pastor et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108693
42. What Is Relatively Permanent? Flow Regimes of Arizona Streams within the Context of the 2023 Conforming Rule on the Revised Definition of “Waters of the United States” J. Julian et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182641
43. Flow intermittence and ecosystem services in rivers of the Anthropocene T. Datry et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12941
44. Inside or Outside: Quantifying Extrapolation Across River Networks D. Booker & A. Whitehead https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023378
45. Trends in Flow Intermittency, Variability, and Seasonality for Taiwan Rivers H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17020271
46. Managing low productive forests at catchment scale: Considering water, biomass and fire risk to achieve economic feasibility M. González-Sanchis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.078
47. Predictions and drivers of sub-reach-scale annual streamflow permanence for the upper Missouri River basin: 1989–2018 R. Sando et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2022.100138
48. Projections of streamflow intermittence under climate change in European drying river networks L. Mimeau et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1615-2025
49. Warming climate and water withdrawals threaten river flow connectivity in China J. Gou et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2421046122
50. Causes, Responses, and Implications of Anthropogenic versus Natural Flow Intermittence in River Networks T. Datry et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac098
51. Reconstructing Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Hydrological State Along Intermittent Rivers M. Eastman et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040493
52. Hydrological classification of non‐perennial Mediterranean rivers and streams: A new insight for their management within the water framework directive J. Alcaraz‐Hernández et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4095
53. Prediction of Hydrologic Characteristics for Ungauged Catchments to Support Hydroecological Modeling N. Bond & M. Kennard https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021119
54. Headwater streams and inland wetlands: Status and advancements of geospatial datasets and maps across the United States J. Christensen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104230
55. Efficiency of invertebrate-based bioassessment for evaluating the ecological status of streams along a gradient of flow intermittence J. Crabot et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108440
56. Streamflow Simulation Based on a Hybrid Morphometric–Satellite Methodological Framework D. Pérez-Campo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18070786
57. A biological tool to assess flow connectivity in reference temporary streams from the Mediterranean Basin N. Cid et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.086
58. Estimation of the prevalence of non-perennial rivers and streams in anthropogenically altered river basins by random Forest modeling: A case study for the Yellow River basin L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132910
59. Variation in reach-scale hydraulic conductivity of streambeds M. Stewardson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.001
60. River intermittency: mapping and upscaling of water occurrence using unmanned aerial vehicle, Random Forest and remote sensing landscape attributes N. Soares et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-849-2026
61. Modeled intermittency risk for small streams in the Upper Colorado River Basin under climate change L. Reynolds et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.025
62. Identifying intermittent river sections with similar hydrology using remotely sensed metrics T. Tayer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130266
63. Big Data Analytics for Long-Term Meteorological Observations at Hanford Site H. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13010136
64. Remotely sensed applications in monitoring the spatio-temporal dynamics of pools and flows along non-perennial rivers: a review S. Maswanganye et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2021.1967774
65. Are all rivers equal? The role of education in attitudes towards temporary and perennial rivers C. Leigh et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.22
66. The Role of Hydrographic Mapping in the Study of Emerging Aquatic Insects on the Landscape Scale R. Gerber et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193019
67. The legacy of STAHY: milestones, achievements, challenges, and open problems in statistical hydrology E. Volpi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2024.2385686
68. A classification approach to reconstruct local daily drying dynamics at headwater streams A. Beaufort et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13445
69. An Exploration of Bayesian Identification of Dominant Hydrological Mechanisms in Ungauged Catchments C. Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030705
70. Non-perennial segments in river networks T. Datry et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00495-w
71. Why Should We Care About Temporary Waterways? V. Acuña et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246666
72. The assessment of water resources in ungauged catchments in Rwanda O. Abimbola et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.09.001
73. Development and Application of Predictive Models of Surface Water Extent to Identify Aquatic Refuges in Eastern Australian Temporary Stream Networks S. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025216
74. Exploiting Sentinel-2 dataset to assess flow intermittency in non-perennial rivers C. Cavallo et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26034-z
75. Exploring the spatio-temporal dynamics of disturbed metacommunities: A mechanistic modeling approach to species resistance and resilience strategies in drying river networks L. Journiac et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111136
76. A multi‐scale study of the dominant catchment characteristics impacting low‐flow metrics M. Floriancic et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14462
77. Impact of catchment and climate attributes on flood generating processes and their effect on flood statistics S. Fischer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132361
78. A review of dynamic monitoring methods for intermittent rivers: Integrating remote sensing and machine learning C. Xie & A. Lv https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-026-2469-x
79. Temporal variability in taxonomic and trait compositions of invertebrate assemblages in two climatic regions with contrasting flow regimes S. Dolédec et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.057
80. Pervasive changes in stream intermittency across the United States S. Zipper et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac14ec
81. Weak relationships between landforms and hydro-climatologic processes: a case study in Haiti C. Gaucherel et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2018.041
82. Regional regression models of percentile flows for the contiguous United States: Expert versus data-driven independent variable selection G. Fouad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.04.002
83. Mediterranean-climate streams and rivers: geographically separated but ecologically comparable freshwater systems N. Bonada & V. Resh https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1634-2
84. Controls on Interactions Between Surface Water, Groundwater, and Riverine Vegetation Along Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams in Arid Regions O. Schilling et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028429
85. Securing Biodiversity, Functional Integrity, and Ecosystem Services in Drying River Networks (DRYvER) T. Datry et al. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.7.e77750
86. How well can people observe the flow state of temporary streams? M. Scheller et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1352697
87. The carbon dioxide evasion cycle of an intermittent first-order stream: contrasting water–air and soil–air exchange A. Looman et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0289-2
88. Extrapolating regional probability of drying of headwater streams using discrete observations and gauging networks A. Beaufort et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3033-2018
89. Classification and trends in intermittent river flow regimes in Australia, northwestern Europe and USA: A global perspective E. Sauquet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126170
90. Accuracy evaluation of cost-effective 3D reconstruction approaches for hydrobiogeochemical processes in non-perennial stream riverbeds J. Bao et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1725258
91. Impact of physico‐geographical factors and climate variability on flow intermittency in the rivers of water surplus zone D. Šarauskienė et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13912
92. Assessing hydrologic similarity in the semi-arid region: a case study in Piranhas-Açu basin P. Bernardo Costa et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-025-01196-6
93. Effects of water scarcity and chemical pollution in aquatic ecosystems: State of the art A. Arenas-Sánchez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.211
94. Quantifying spatial and temporal patterns of flow intermittency using spatially contiguous runoff data S. Yu (于松延) et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.009
95. Taking theory to the field: streamflow generation mechanisms in an intermittent Mediterranean catchment K. Gutierrez-Jurado et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4299-2021
96. Flow Regime Classification and Hydrological Characterization: A Case Study of Ethiopian Rivers B. Berhanu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7063149
97. A landscape approach to advance intermittent river ecology T. Datry et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12645
98. Trends in flow intermittence for European rivers Y. Tramblay et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1849708
99. Time–frequency analysis to profile hydrological regimes: application to Haiti C. Gaucherel et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1006231
100. Flow Prediction in Ungauged Catchments Using Probabilistic Random Forests Regionalization and New Statistical Adequacy Tests C. Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023254
101. A Data Censoring Approach for Predictive Error Modeling of Flow in Ephemeral Rivers Q. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026128
102. Biomonitoring of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams in Europe: Current practice and priorities to enhance ecological status assessments R. Stubbington et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.137
103. Spatial Patterns and Drivers of Nonperennial Flow Regimes in the Contiguous United States J. Hammond et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090794
104. Citizen scientists can help advance the science and management of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams A. Truchy et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biad045
105. Towards baseflow index characterisation at national scale in New Zealand S. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.025
106. Drying as a primary hydrological determinant of biodiversity in river systems: a broad‐scale analysis C. Leigh & T. Datry https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02230
107. Unveiling the hidden dynamics of intermittent surface water: A remote sensing framework Z. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2024.114285
108. High stream intermittency in an alpine fluvial network: Val Roseg, Switzerland A. Paillex et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11324
109. Débits écologiques : la place des modèles d’habitat hydraulique dans une démarche intégrée N. Lamouroux et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/hydro/2016004