Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1151–1169, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1151-2012
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1151–1169, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1151-2012

Research article 10 Apr 2012

Research article | 10 Apr 2012

Dynamic versus static neural network model for rainfall forecasting at Klang River Basin, Malaysia

A. El-Shafie1, A. Noureldin2, M. Taha1, A. Hussain3, and M. Mukhlisin1 A. El-Shafie et al.
  • 1Civil and Structural Engineering Dept. University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • 2Electrical and Computer Engineering, Royal Military College, Kingston, Canada
  • 3Electric, Electronics Systems Engineering Dept. University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

Abstract. Rainfall is considered as one of the major components of the hydrological process; it takes significant part in evaluating drought and flooding events. Therefore, it is important to have an accurate model for rainfall forecasting. Recently, several data-driven modeling approaches have been investigated to perform such forecasting tasks as multi-layer perceptron neural networks (MLP-NN). In fact, the rainfall time series modeling involves an important temporal dimension. On the other hand, the classical MLP-NN is a static and has a memoryless network architecture that is effective for complex nonlinear static mapping. This research focuses on investigating the potential of introducing a neural network that could address the temporal relationships of the rainfall series.

Two different static neural networks and one dynamic neural network, namely the multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLP-NN), radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) and input delay neural network (IDNN), respectively, have been examined in this study. Those models had been developed for the two time horizons for monthly and weekly rainfall forecasting at Klang River, Malaysia. Data collected over 12 yr (1997–2008) on a weekly basis and 22 yr (1987–2008) on a monthly basis were used to develop and examine the performance of the proposed models. Comprehensive comparison analyses were carried out to evaluate the performance of the proposed static and dynamic neural networks. Results showed that the MLP-NN neural network model is able to follow trends of the actual rainfall, however, not very accurately. RBFNN model achieved better accuracy than the MLP-NN model. Moreover, the forecasting accuracy of the IDNN model was better than that of static network during both training and testing stages, which proves a consistent level of accuracy with seen and unseen data.

Download