94 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Laboratory studies on bedload transport under unsteady flow conditions M. Mrokowska et al. 10.1515/johh-2017-0032
2. Channel-flow response function considering the downstream tidal effect and hydraulic characteristics P. Huang & K. Lee 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126827
3. Experimental evidence on the performance of rating curves for continuous discharge estimation in complex flow situations Z. Cheng et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.021
4. Image-based measurements of surface flow velocity, turbulence, and depth distribution during sediment replenishment implementation in the Naka River, Japan J. Lin et al. 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2024.102626
5. Simulating historical flood events at the continental scale: observational validation of a large-scale hydrodynamic model O. Wing et al. 10.5194/nhess-21-559-2021
6. Estimating water discharge from large radar altimetry datasets A. Getirana & C. Peters-Lidard 10.5194/hess-17-923-2013
7. Recent developments in predictive uncertainty assessment based on the model conditional processor approach G. Coccia & E. Todini 10.5194/hess-15-3253-2011
8. Prerequisites for Accurate Monitoring of River Discharge Based on Fixed‐Location Velocity Measurements K. Kästner et al. 10.1002/2017WR020990
9. Consistency assessment of rating curve data in various locations using Bidirectional Reach (BReach) K. Van Eerdenbrugh et al. 10.5194/hess-21-5315-2017
10. Spatiotemporal variability of suspended sediment particle size in a mixed-land-use watershed E. Kellner & J. Hubbart 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.040
11. A SWAT model validation of nested-scale contemporaneous stream flow, suspended sediment and nutrients from a multiple-land-use watershed of the central USA S. Zeiger & J. Hubbart 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.178
12. Temporal variability in stage–discharge relationships J. Guerrero et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.031
13. A flood-crest forecast prototype for river floods using only in-stream measurements M. Muste et al. 10.1038/s43247-022-00402-z
14. An Assessment of Mean Areal Precipitation Methods on Simulated Stream Flow: A SWAT Model Performance Assessment S. Zeiger & J. Hubbart 10.3390/w9070459
15. System Identification and Discharge Hydrograph Estimation Based on Water Level Data Alone under Unsteady Flow Condition B. Balouchi & M. Abedini 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001848
16. Coupling of approximate convection diffusion wave method with ultrasonic sensor to estimate discharge in Himalayan Rivers K. Adhikari et al. 10.1080/09715010.2023.2225170
17. Technical Note: Monitoring of unsteady open channel flows using the continuous slope-area method K. Lee et al. 10.5194/hess-21-1863-2017
18. A method for advancing understanding of streamflow and geomorphological characteristics in mixed-land-use watersheds E. Kellner & J. Hubbart 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.070
19. Measuring and modeling event-based environmental flows: An assessment of HEC-RAS 2D rain-on-grid simulations S. Zeiger & J. Hubbart 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112125
20. Stream and shallow groundwater nutrient concentrations in an Ozark forested riparian zone of the central USA P. Chinnasamy & J. Hubbart 10.1007/s12665-014-3880-7
21. Construction of rating curve at high water level considering rainfall effect in a tidal river M. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100907
22. High-resolution hydrometeorological data from a network of headwater catchments in the tropical Andes B. Ochoa-Tocachi et al. 10.1038/sdata.2018.80
23. The effect of the Changjiang River on water regimes of its tributary Lake East Dongting X. Dai et al. 10.1007/s11442-018-1542-5
24. SHORT TERM PREDICTION OF WATER LEVEL AND DISCHARGE USING A 2D DYNAMIC WAVE MODEL WITH PARTICLE FILTERS Y. KIM et al. 10.2208/jscejhe.68.I_25
25. Quantifying land use influences on event-based flow frequency, timing, magnitude, and rate of change in an urbanizing watershed of the central USA S. Zeiger & J. Hubbart 10.1007/s12665-018-7312-y
26. Flow class analyses of suspended sediment concentration and particle size in a mixed-land-use watershed E. Kellner & J. Hubbart 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.187
27. Can regional to continental river hydrodynamic models be locally relevant? A cross-scale comparison A. Fleischmann et al. 10.1016/j.hydroa.2019.100027
28. Towards hydrological model calibration using river level measurements J. Jian et al. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.12.085
29. The Freshwater Balance of the Adriatic Sea: A Sensitivity Study M. Vodopivec et al. 10.1029/2022JC018870
30. Hysteresis-influenced stage-discharge rating curve based on isovel contours and Jones formula S. Vatanchi & M. Maghrebi 10.1007/s00477-024-02716-0
31. Rainfall–stream flow responses in a mixed-land-use and municipal watershed of the central USA S. Zeiger & J. Hubbart 10.1007/s12665-018-7630-0
32. Can a Calibration-Free Dynamic Rainfall‒Runoff Model Predict FDCs in Data-Scarce Regions? Comparing the IDW Model with the Dynamic Budyko Model in South India A. Nag & B. Biswal 10.3390/hydrology6020032
33. Comment on "A praxis-oriented perspective of streamflow inference from stage observations – the method of Dottori et al. (2009) and the alternative of the Jones Formula, with the kinematic wave celerity computed on the looped rating curve" by Koussis (2009) A. Koussis 10.5194/hess-14-1093-2010
34. Identification of temporal consistency in rating curve data: Bidirectional Reach (BReach) K. Van Eerdenbrugh et al. 10.1002/2016WR018692
35. An expanded rating curve model to estimate river discharge during tidal influences across the progressive-mixed-standing wave systems A. Jones et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0225758
36. Assessing Environmental Flow Targets Using Pre-Settlement Land Cover: A SWAT Modeling Application S. Zeiger & J. Hubbart 10.3390/w10060791
37. Use of Lower-Order and Higher–Order Streams in Modelling the Rating Curve A. Ibeje 10.1007/s11269-018-2145-8
38. Uncertainty in streamflow rating curves: methods, controls and consequences K. Tomkins 10.1002/hyp.9567
39. Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: rainfall, river discharge and water quality H. McMillan et al. 10.1002/hyp.9384
40. Hydrodynamic Modeling for Flow and Velocity Estimation from an Arduino Ultrasonic Sensor T. Pereira et al. 10.3390/hydrology11020012
41. Quantifying flow interval–pollutant loading relationships in a rapidly urbanizing mixed-land-use watershed of the Central USA S. Zeiger & J. Hubbart 10.1007/s12665-017-6819-y
42. Bayesian inference of synthetic daily rating curves by coupling Chebyshev Polynomials and the GR4J model R. Navas et al. 10.5194/piahs-385-399-2024
43. Quantifying and modelling urban stream temperature: a central US watershed study S. Zeiger et al. 10.1002/hyp.10617
44. Improving understanding of mixed-land-use watershed suspended sediment regimes: Mechanistic progress through high-frequency sampling E. Kellner & J. Hubbart 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.052
45. Multiprofile Discharge Estimation in the Tidal Reach of Yangtze Estuary J. Zhao et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001201
46. A methodological approach of estimating resistance to flow under unsteady flow conditions M. Mrokowska et al. 10.5194/hess-19-4041-2015
47. Application of the experimental watershed approach to advance urban watershed precipitation/discharge understanding E. Kellner & J. Hubbart 10.1007/s11252-016-0631-4
48. Geomorphic control on stage-area hysteresis in three of the largest floodplain lakes W. Ang et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128574
49. Refinement of the Fread Method for Improved Tracking of Stream Discharges during Unsteady Flows K. Lee & M. Muste 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001280
50. Deep Learning-Based Automatic River Flow Estimation Using RADARSAT Imagery S. Ziadi et al. 10.3390/rs16101808
51. Experimental investigation of loop rating curve on a small 3D printed laboratory channel S. Majdalani et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129741
52. Assessing the Difference between Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Simulated Pre-Development and Observed Developed Loading Regimes S. Zeiger & J. Hubbart 10.3390/hydrology5020029
53. Potential of MODFLOW to Model Hydrological Interactions in a Semikarst Floodplain of the Ozark Border Forest in the Central United States P. Chinnasamy & J. Hubbart 10.1175/EI-D-14-0015.1
54. Time-Lapse Photography: Low-Cost, Low-Tech Alternative for Monitoring Flow Depth G. Schoener 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001616
55. A Simulation–Optimization Technique to Estimate Discharge in Open Channels Based on Water Level Data Alone: Gradually Varied Flow Condition B. Balouchi et al. 10.1007/s40996-018-0149-5
56. Modeling unsteady and steady 1D hydrodynamics under different hydraulic conceptualizations: Model/Software development and case studies M. Gomes et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105733
57. Revisiting hysteresis of flow variables in monitoring unsteady streamflows M. Muste et al. 10.1080/00221686.2020.1786742
58. Simple vs complex rating curves: accounting for measurement uncertainty, slope ratio and sample size M. Sörengård & G. Di Baldassarre 10.1080/02626667.2017.1367397
59. Analytical approach for determining the mean water level profile in an estuary with substantial fresh water discharge H. Cai et al. 10.5194/hess-20-1177-2016
60. Advancing Understanding of the Surface Water Quality Regime of Contemporary Mixed-Land-Use Watersheds: An Application of the Experimental Watershed Method E. Kellner & J. Hubbart 10.3390/hydrology4020031
61. Insights into Flood Wave Propagation in Natural Streams as Captured with Acoustic Profilers at an Index-Velocity Gaging Station M. Muste et al. 10.3390/w14091380
62. Urban Stormwater Temperature Surges: A Central US Watershed Study S. Zeiger & J. Hubbart 10.3390/hydrology2040193
63. Uncertainty in the estimation of backwater effects at bridge crossings L. Brandimarte & M. Woldeyes 10.1002/hyp.9350
64. Estimation of Peak Discharge in a Poorly Gauged Catchment Based on a Specified Hyetograph Model and Geomorphological Parameters: Case Study for the 23–24 October 2008 Flood, KALAYA Basin, Tangier, Morocco I. Khaddor et al. 10.3390/hydrology6010010
65. UIDS: A Matlab-based urban flood model considering rainfall-induced and surcharge-induced inundations V. Tran & J. Kim 10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106132
66. Assessing rating-curve uncertainty and its effects on hydraulic model calibration A. Domeneghetti et al. 10.5194/hess-16-1191-2012
67. Analyse de l’opportunité d’application des méthodes d’estimation des débits des rivières par courbe de tarage et capteur doppler immergé fixe L. Mballa E. & S. Bennis 10.1139/cjce-2013-0509
68. Modelling Regime Changes of Dunes to Upper-Stage Plane Bed in Flumes and in Rivers O. Duin et al. 10.3390/app112311212
69. Separation of Floodplain Flow and Bankfull Discharge: Application of 1D Momentum Equation Solver and MIKE 21C S. Sarker 10.3390/civileng4030050
70. Characterization of sub-watershed-scale stream chemistry regimes in an Appalachian mixed-land-use watershed E. Kellner et al. 10.1007/s10661-018-6968-9
71. A framework for detecting stage-discharge hysteresis due to flow unsteadiness: Application to France’s national hydrometry network E. Perret et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127567
72. A method for estimating flash flood peak discharge in a poorly gauged basin: Case study for the 13–14 January 1994 flood, Giofiros basin, Crete, Greece A. Koutroulis & I. Tsanis 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.012
73. Applicability of Kinematic model for mud-flows: An unsteady analysis C. Di Cristo et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123967
74. Reply to the Discussion of “Assessment and review of the hydraulics of storage flood routing 70 years after the presentation of the Muskingum method” by M. Perumal A. Koussis 10.1080/02626667.2010.491261
75. Discharge estimation in a backwater affected meandering river H. Hidayat et al. 10.5194/hess-15-2717-2011
76. Locally Relevant High‐Resolution Hydrodynamic Modeling of River Floods at the Regional Scale A. Buttinger‐Kreuzhuber et al. 10.1029/2021WR030820
77. Development of discharge-stage curves affected by hysteresis using time varying models, model trees and neural networks V. Wolfs & P. Willems 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.01.021
78. Quantifying loading, toxic concentrations, and systemic persistence of chloride in a contemporary mixed-land-use watershed using an experimental watershed approach J. Hubbart et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.019
79. Discharge estimation from H‐ADCP measurements in a tidal river subject to sidewall effects and a mobile bed M. Sassi et al. 10.1029/2010WR009972
80. System identification and subsequent discharge estimation based on level data alone—Gradually varied flow condition H. Damangir & M. Abedini 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2014.01.002
81. Developments of a flood inundation model based on the cellular automata approach: Testing different methods to improve model performance F. Dottori & E. Todini 10.1016/j.pce.2011.02.004
82. Considering rating curve uncertainty in water level predictions A. Sikorska et al. 10.5194/hess-17-4415-2013
83. Hybrid Modeling of a Gauging Station Rating Curve Ø. Pedersen & N. Rüther 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.535
84. Potential advantages of flow-area rating curves compared to classic stage-discharge-relations S. Manfreda et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124752
85. Toward a reliable decomposition of predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: Characterizing rainfall errors using conditional simulation B. Renard et al. 10.1029/2011WR010643
86. Enhancement and comprehensive evaluation of the Rating Curve Model for different river sites S. Barbetta et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.027
87. Calibration of satellite measurements of river discharge using a global hydrology model G. Robert Brakenridge et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.035
88. Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors B. Renard et al. 10.1029/2009WR008328
89. Reconstruction of Tidal Discharges in the St. Lawrence Fluvial Estuary: The Method of Cubature Revisited P. Matte et al. 10.1029/2018JC013834
90. Canada’s Contributions to the SWOT Mission – Terrestrial Hydrology(SWOT-C TH) A. Pietroniro et al. 10.1080/07038992.2019.1581056
91. Discharge estimation in a backwater affected meandering river H. Hidayat et al. 10.5194/hess-15-2717-2011
92. Roughness and Discharge Uncertainty in 1D Water Level Calculations S. Bozzi et al. 10.1007/s10666-014-9430-6
93. L'influence de l'hystérésis dans le développement des relations niveau-débit R. Sánchez et al. 10.1051/lhb/2013050
94. Uncertainty in river discharge observations: a quantitative analysis G. Di Baldassarre & A. Montanari 10.5194/hess-13-913-2009