the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Altitudinal variation in impacts of snow cover, reservoirs and precipitation seasonality on monthly runoff in Tibetan Plateau catchments
Abstract. Although of great importance for long-term, effective water resource allocation, current knowledge of monthly runoff variability, its spatio-temporal characteristics, and underlying key drivers, including their sensitivity to climate change and other human impacts, is limited. With a particular focus on 10 sub-basins along an elevation gradient (1000 to 5900 m.a.s.l.) in the hydrologically complex, seasonally cold Yalong River basin, China, this study developed an extended Budyko framework based on monthly water balances (2002–2016) to consider snow storage dynamics (∆Ssnow) separately from other terrestrial water storage changes (∆S’), including those related to hydropower reservoir construction. Results showed that snow accumulation and snowmelt are main drivers of runoff seasonality in the upper sub-catchments of the Yalong River basin, with propagating impacts also on lower-elevation snow-free sub-catchments, which are increasingly under the additional influence of hydropower reservoirs. This creates a relatively strong altitudinal heterogeneity in drivers of monthly runoff, which has been hypothesized to occur also in other world regions including e.g. major European rivers of Alpine origin, although not yet quantified at similarly high spatio-temporal resolution. Furthermore, an observed decrease in runoff seasonality in the Yalong River at its Yangtze River outlet (that receives water from all 10 investigated sub-basins) was shown to be unrelated to snow storage changes and hence likely caused by trends in unfrozen precipitation seasonality and/or flow-modulating impacts of constructed reservoirs, natural lakes and groundwater, implying that further snow thinning may exacerbate such trends in the future. Implementing the variance decomposition method based on the extended Budyko framework, the intra-annual runoff variability (σ2R) was captured by calculating the variance and covariance of influencing factors (R2 values above 0.9 in most sub-basins) with the main contributors being variances of rainfall (Pr) and ∆S’. Methodologically, we have verified the substantial contribution of hydropower reservoir storage changes on total storage changes by independent analysis of reservoir storage data, supporting the applicability of the extended monthly Budyko framework for identifying dominant processes in the context of runoff generation and the rapid environmental changes that the Yalong River basin and other cold regions (not least of the Tibetan plateau) are currently experiencing.
- Preprint
(11432 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(3254 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 12 Jun 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2024-401', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Apr 2025
reply
The authors of this paper implement an extended Budyko framework for high-elevation catchments to understand the changes in water balance characteristics. Additionally, they tried to isolate the major drivers of monthly runoff variability in the region.
The overall analysis was sound and merits discussion. However, there are significant issues with the general writing of the manuscript, with many convoluted statements. My primary concerns are listed below.
Specific Comments
- The abstract needs to be more concise. The statements feel overcrowded and convoluted. Please try to split long sentences for better readability.
- How will the phase transition of precipitation (from snow to rain), influenced by a warming climate observed over high-elevation regions, affect runoff characteristics? A brief discussion on this will give more context to the results presented. Also, what about any potential glacier cover in the region?
- Lines 65 to 70: Add references supporting these statements.
- Line 90: The line should be “A more detailed understanding of intra-annual runoff characteristics...”
- The range of altitudes in the basin has been stated multiple times in the manuscript. However, the source/reference for this information is not mentioned properly.
- Section 2.1 has many convoluted sentences. Consider simplifying them. For instance, Lines 153 to 157 could be better explained with an equation rather than text. Lines 238 to 242 are not readable.
- Why is the study period chosen as 2002 to 2016? Were there any significant changes that happened in the region? Please clarify.
- Some of the sub-basins chosen are nested basins. It will be good to mention them and their characteristics in the study area section.
- Line 145: It is stated that the implementation of the extended Budyko framework is explained in Sect. 2.2. However, Sect. 2.2 in the manuscript is about the study area and data. Also, starting Section 2 with Study Area and Data would be better, and then move to the methodology.
- Line 248: Check the equation number. Is it 10 or 11?
- Line 281: The table number should be S2.
- Include elevation information of the outlet stations in Table S2.
- The labels of the sub-basins are not clear in Figure 2. Consider making them bold/bigger. Also, provide information on the source for the DEM and snow depth data in the figure. Labelling the three figures as (a), (b), and (c) and providing a proper caption for each will bring more clarity.
- Figure 3 indicates consistent negative values for total storage change across all the basins. Explain this.
- A few new results are introduced in the Discussion section, which should ideally be in the results section. For instance, the total runoff, snowmelt runoff, and the runoff contribution from reservoirs in Figure 9 are not mentioned before. Additionally, Figure 9 shows a time period from 1980 to 2017, which is beyond what was mentioned in the previous results obtained from the study. Please clarify.
- Lines 556-558: A hypothesis on other parts of the world may be made in the discussion part. Or this can be stated as a possible future work.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-401-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ke Zhang, 19 May 2025
reply
We sincerely thank the reviewer for the valuable and constructive comments. We have carefully addressed each of the issues raised and will revise the manuscript accordingly based on the suggestions. Please refer to the detailed point-by-point responses in the attached document. We would be grateful for any further suggestions.
-
RC2: 'Comment on hess-2024-401', Anonymous Referee #2, 16 May 2025
reply
This paper presents an evaluation of the monthly water balance using an extended Budyko framework to analyze the contribution of snow storage to runoff seasonality. The topic is timely and offers valuable insights into the understanding of hydrological processes. The manuscript is well written, with a clear description of the methodology and a solid explanation of the results, especially an additional experiment incorporating reservoir data to validate the Budyko approach. The hypotheses employed and limitations of Budyko framework is also discussed. I have only minor comments regarding the paper structure, which I hope will help improve the overall readability of this manuscript.
General comment:
To my understanding, the idea of including nested catchments is related to identifying the influence of hydropower. If this is correct, I would suggest clarifying this when introducing the nested catchments in the study area section. This will help readers understand the rationale for this design early.
Line-by-line Comments:
Line 29, “increasingly” here better be “increase”.
Line 31, consider rephrasing “other world regions” to “other global regions.”
Line 99, missing a period here at the end of the sentence.
Line 165, Figure 1 needs a more detailed explanation. While it is introduced as an overview in Line 149, the description lacks details on its components (e.g., Part 1, Part 2). I recommend providing a brief explanation of the figure in the text, highlighting how it corresponds to the subsections under 2.1. This would make the structure easier to follow.
Line 235, regarding the section on cross-correlation, partial correlation is also discussed in the results (Line 355). It would improve consistency to include a brief introduction to partial correlation in the methods section here.
Line 239 to 241, the sentences here appear incomplete or unclear. Please revise for clarity and ensure complete sentence structure.
Line 324, Figure 3, there is a purple vertical line at the right border of the figure, which seems unintended. Please check and correct if necessary.
Line 355, “downtrending” here seems likely to be “detrending”? As noted in the previous comment, it would be helpful to move this information to the Methods section and include a brief explanation.
Line 399, here seems a typo error before “degree of correlation.”
Line 435, typo error here.
Line 487, typo error here too.
Line 571, the phrase "less than a month", does this mean "concurrent" or does it also include a "one-month lag"? Please clarify.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-401-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Ke Zhang, 19 May 2025
reply
We sincerely thank the reviewer for the valuable and constructive comments. We have carefully addressed each of the issues raised and will revise the manuscript accordingly based on the suggestions. Please refer to the detailed point-by-point responses in the attached document. We would be grateful for any further suggestions.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Ke Zhang, 19 May 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
172 | 30 | 10 | 212 | 19 | 7 | 7 |
- HTML: 172
- PDF: 30
- XML: 10
- Total: 212
- Supplement: 19
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1