the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Evaluation of remote sensing algorithms for estimating actual evapotranspiration in arid agricultural environments
Abstract. Accurate estimation of actual evapotranspiration (ETa) at both field and larger spatial scales is crucial for understanding crop water use and hydrological interactions particularly in arid regions facing water scarcity. In South Africa, ETa data gaps hinder effective agricultural water management. Advances in geospatial techniques combining Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and remote sensing have made it possible to estimate ETa over large areas. However, the reliability of this depends on the accuracy of algorithms used which must be validated against ground measurements. With the lack of direct ETa measurements in South Africa, this has been a challenging task. This study evaluated ETa variability at farm level to the level of an irrigation Scheme, covering over 36,000 hectares. A total of 22 Landsat 8 satellite images from 2019 to 2021 were used to estimate ETa based on four algorithms: the Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL), Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS), Vegetation Index (VI)-based ETa and Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI)-based ETa. Field-scale estimates were compared to measurements from a smart field weighing lysimeter, while larger-scale estimates were validated against extrapolated ETa values. The SEBAL, SEBS and VI-based ETa algorithms correlated well with field-scale lysimeter data, while the CWSI-based algorithm showed poor correlation. SEBAL emerged as the best-performing algorithm, with high correlation coefficients (r=0.91–0.96), strong R² values (0.83–0.92) and the lowest errors (RMSE 0.31–0.89 mm d⁻¹, MAE 0.27–0.82 mm d⁻¹). Findings from this study forms a foundation of improved water management strategies to reduce the overuse of water in agriculture.
- Preprint
(1573 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1559 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 25 May 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2024-351', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 May 2025
reply
The paper addresses a practical and regionally important issue within the broader context of water resource management—evaluating the performance of remote sensing-based evapotranspiration (ETa) models in an irrigation scheme in South Africa. While not breaking ground scientifically, the work does offer new observational data from a lysimeter, contributing valuable empirical input to the ongoing validation of satellite-based models. The authors have appropriately credited existing literature and positioned their work as an application-oriented assessment, potentially beneficial for operational water management in similar semi-arid agricultural regions. However, the contribution to Hydrology and Earth System Sciences is limited to new data and validation.
Despite its practical relevance, the paper falls short in several critical areas of scientific rigor. The methodology is not sufficiently detailed to allow reproducibility, particularly regarding the extrapolation of lysimeter data to broader spatial scales using NDVI and weather station data. This key step lacks clarity and justification. Moreover, the use of a single small-scale lysimeter (0.07 m², barley crop) to validate models over a large and diverse 36,000-hectare scheme is problematic and undermines the reliability of the conclusions. The paper fails to account for variability in crop types and their respective Kc-NDVI relationships, resulting in questionable generalizations. Furthermore, the presentation suffers from unclear language, missing supplementary figures, and a title and abstract that do not accurately reflect the study’s scope or limitations.
To meet the scientific and editorial standards of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS), the authors must significantly improve the methodological transparency and analytical rigor.
- They need to clearly explain how lysimeter-derived ETa was extrapolated across different crops and locations, addressing the variability in NDVI-Kc relationships.
- Quantitative uncertainty analysis, considering extrapolation and measurement errors, should be introduced to evaluate the sensitivity of results and robustness of conclusions.
- The title and abstract must be revised to better represent the geographic and methodological scope.
- Missing supplementary materials should be included, and the overall structure, clarity, and language of the manuscript should be refined to enhance readability and traceability.
- In addition, all the specific comments must also be addressed (see my comments in the attached PDF). If you have problems seeing the comments, let me know.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
229 | 71 | 11 | 311 | 22 | 11 | 11 |
- HTML: 229
- PDF: 71
- XML: 11
- Total: 311
- Supplement: 22
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1