the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Return period of high-dimensional compound events. Part II: Analysis of spatially-variable precipitation
Abstract. This study introduces a comprehensive framework for modeling compound precipitation events, with a focus on handling zero intermittency in rainfall data. By expanding the existing methodologies to a five-dimensional approach and applying the joint return period (JRP) concept using both Gaussian copulas and R-vines with Gaussian, extreme value, and t-Student copulas, we offer a more accurate understanding of these complex events. A key contribution of this study is the proposal of a model that calculates the multivariate return period in five dimensions, surpassing the commonly used bivariate approach, and considers the dependence of precipitation events across multiple sites, accounting for both lower and upper tail dependencies. The comparison of dependency structures in the generated samples shows that the R-vine structure with extreme value copulas in a multivariate mixed model is particularly effective at capturing the spatial dependence in the data. Our findings emphasize that an inappropriate choice of copulas can lead to either overestimation or underestimation of design events with defined return periods, with significant implications for risk management.
- Preprint
(8260 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 21 Jan 2025)
-
CC1: 'Comment on hess-2024-335', Hafidha Khebizi, 08 Jan 2025
reply
Dear authors and colleagues of the scientific community,
Fist, I would like to thank the authors for the valuable response to my comment concerning Part I and I am pleased to add a second comment for Return period of high-dimensional compound events. Part II: Analysis of spatially-variable precipitation.
For this, four questions seems to me interesting to be asked if possible. My first question concerns the RP. It changes in space and time and its occurrence is not necessarily of the same intensity. How can you differentiate short return periods from long-term ones?
My second question, in addition to the hydraulic and hydrological study, is it possible to introduce anthropogenic variables, for example, the existence of dams, sewage networks, treatment plants, which can by incidence or overload amplify the risk of flooding?
My third question concerns the implications of geomorphology and the terrigenous material transported and deposited during the flood. For this, I would like to invite you to read my discussion concerning the Evaluation the Effectiveness Of The Existing Flood Risk Protection Measures Along Wadi Deffa In El-Bayadh City, Algeria By Ben Said M., Hafnaoui M.A., Hachemi A., Madi M., Benmalek A.
In this discussion, I highlighted the implications of geomorphology and the sedimentary material transported and then deposited during the flood. These are two related factors that change over time where we can follow the evolution of the morphology of the river and quantify the terrigenous material. Using your approach, can you combine runoff morphology and sediment supply in a flood scenario?
A final question concerns the lithological vulnerability, particularly erosion and the implication of flooding on urban areas. Is it possible to add variables indicating the lithological vulnerability in the modelling, or should the modelling in your approach be limited to hydroclimatological data?
Here attached, my discussion Of Evaluating The Effectiveness Of The Existing Flood Risk Protection Measures Along Wadi Deffa In El-Bayadh City, Algeria By Ben Said M., Hafnaoui M.A., Hachemi A., Madi M., Benmalek A.
Reference:
Khebizi H. (2024) Discussion Of Evaluating The Effectiveness Of The Existing Flood Risk Protection Measures Along Wadi Deffa In El-Bayadh City, Algeria By Ben Said M., Hafnaoui M.A., Hachemi A., Madi M., Benmalek A. Larhyss Journal, ISSN 1112-3680, n°60, Dec 2024, pp. 293-296.
Kind regards
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2024-335', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Jan 2025
reply
See attached PDF.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
182 | 35 | 6 | 223 | 4 | 3 |
- HTML: 182
- PDF: 35
- XML: 6
- Total: 223
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1