Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-219
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-219
03 Sep 2024
 | 03 Sep 2024
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal HESS.

Comparison of different ensemble assimilation methods in a modular hydrological model dedicated to water quality management

Emilie Rouzies, Claire Lauvernet, and Arthur Vidard

Abstract. Hydrological models are valuable tools for understanding the movement of water and contaminants in agricultural catchments. They are particularly useful for assessing the impact of landscape organization on pesticide transfers and for developing effective mitigation strategies. However, using these models in an operational context requires reducing uncertainties in their outputs, which can be achieved through data assimilation methods. In this study, we aim to integrate surface moisture images into the PESHMELBA water and pesticide transfer model using data assimilation techniques. Twin experiments were conducted on a virtual catchment consisting of vineyard plots and vegetative filter strips. We compared the performance of the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF), the Ensemble Smoother with Multiple Data Assimilation (ES-MDA), and the iterative Ensemble Kalman Smoother (iEnKS) in jointly estimating vertical moisture profiles and certain input parameters. Results indicate that ES-MDA performs the best in estimating surface moisture and related input parameters, while all methods show similar results for subsurface moisture variables and parameters. Furthermore, we examined the sensitivity of the methods to observation error magnitude, observation frequency, and ensemble size to establish an effective assimilation setup. This study paves the way for future operational applications of data assimilation in PESHMELBA.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Emilie Rouzies, Claire Lauvernet, and Arthur Vidard

Status: open (until 30 Oct 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Emilie Rouzies, Claire Lauvernet, and Arthur Vidard
Emilie Rouzies, Claire Lauvernet, and Arthur Vidard

Viewed

Total article views: 135 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
99 29 7 135 4 3
  • HTML: 99
  • PDF: 29
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 135
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Sep 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Sep 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 132 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 132 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Sep 2024
Download
Short summary
Hydrological models are useful for assessing the impact of landscape organization for effective mitigation strategies. However, using these models requires reducing uncertainties in their results, which can be achieved through model-data fusion. We integrate satellite surface moisture images into a water and pesticide transfer model. We compare 3 methods, studying their performance, and exploring various scenarios. This study helps improving decision support in water quality management.